Alpha Chi - Spring 2005, St. Louis Convention

 

                 

 

Convention Program: http://www.harding.edu/alphachi/PDF/2005ConvProg.pdf

 

Faculty Sponsor: Dr. Howard Smolleck, Klipsch School of Electrical and Computer Engineering

 

            Presenter                   Title of Presentation                                      Category

 

Some Pictures while at Convention:

(**for additional pictures join us during induction and see our chapter photo album)

 

 

 

 

 "The Arch"

 

 

 

 

 

~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~

Just for Enrichment; Some Information about Academic Integrity:

Source:

http://www.cc.umanitoba.ca/student/resource/student_advocacy/inappropriate_collaborate.shtml

 

Inappropriate Collaboration

Introduction
The University of Manitoba treats cases of inappropriate collaboration and other forms of academic dishonesty, very seriously. Honesty and fairness are fundamental aspects of the University’s mission. As a result, any member of the University community who violates these principles is dealt with as if he/she is damaging the integrity of the University itself. If you have been accused of inappropriate collaboration or a similar scholastic offence, you may be surprised at how formally and seriously the accusation is dealt with and how severe the consequences can be. Students may be sanctioned or disciplinary action may be taken under the Student Discipline bylaw, 1202.

Purpose of this information
It is hoped that this information will:


The student’s responsibility

It is the responsibility of the student to:

What is collaboration?

Collaboration can include, but is not limited to:

Why limit or prohibit collaboration?

Inappropriate collaboration is unethical because it:

When is collaboration inappropriate?

When students work together or share information without specific instructions by the professor, this constitutes inappropriate collaboration. This applies to in-class or take-home tests, papers, labs, or homework assignments; basically, any assignment that will be submitted for a grade. Students should not collaborate until the professor gives specific instructions about group work and when this is permissible.

What are the "ground rules"?

If you have been accused of inappropriate collaboration:

Control your angry feelings. It is a common reaction to feel anger toward the person who alleges that you have cheated. It is important that you master these feelings to prevent you from saying or doing something you may later regret.

Be honest. Always answer questions honestly, as it is your professor’s obligation to determine the truth. Your honesty may be taken into consideration when determining the penalty assigned if you are found guilty.

Know your rights. There is an appeal process available to you, should you find the case was handled improperly by others. You are also able to see a Student Advocate to receive help or advice in the preliminary stages of an investigation.

What is the next step?

Meet with a Student Advocate;

The situation may result in a warning or a penalty;

If this is judged to be a serious breach of academic integrity, the case may be referred to the dean’s office or beyond.

The penalty

If you are found guilty of the offence, the penalty assigned to you may vary according to the following factors:

Range of penalties (disciplinary action)

The professor who brought the allegation against the student cannot impose the penalty (Student Discipline Bylaw; 1202). He or she must refer the matter to the department head or dean.

Penalties can include:

Can I appeal? How?

Yes, students do have the right to appeal either the disciplinary matter, the disciplinary action, or both. The Student Advocacy office can assist you in your appeal process. The process normally involves writing a letter to the appropriate authority explaining your situation, followed by attendance at a hearing where a committee will hear your case.

The first level of the appeal is the Local Discipline Committee (L.D.C.) which is assembled to hear appeals at the faculty level. If you are not satisfied with the outcome at this level, you may appeal further to the University Discipline Committee (U.D.C.) which hears appeals of L.D.C. decisions or decisions made from other disciplinary authorities such as residence appeal committees.

How to avoid inappropriate collaboration

You can protect yourself from being charged with inappropriate collaboration by taking the initiative to prevent it:

~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~**~~**~

 

Links: