SELF-STUDY DOCUMENT FOR

ACCREDITATION REVIEW BY THE

COUNCIL ON EDUCATION FOR PUBLIC HEALTH (CEPH)

  

 

NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY (NMSU)

Master of Public Health (MPH) in Community Health Education

Department of Health Science

P.O. Box 30001, MSC 3HLS

Las Cruces, NM 88003-8001

Phone 505-646-4300

Fax 505-646-4343

Web site www.nmsu.edu/~hlthdpt

CONTACT:

Stephen D. Arnold, Ph.D.

Academic Department Head

Email sarnold@nmsu.edu

First draft submitted September, 1999.

Final version submitted December, 1999.

This version was printed on December 6, 1999.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MISSION, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

CRITERION I.

ORGANIZATIONAL SETTING – EXTERNAL

Criterion II. A.

ORGANIZATIONAL SETTING – INTERNAL

Criterion II. B.

GOVERNANCE

Criterion III.

RESOURCES

Criterion IV.

INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS

Criterion V. A.

Criterion V. B.

Criterion V. C.

Criterion V. D.

Criterion V. E.

Criterion V. F.

Criterion V. G.

RESEARCH

Criterion VI.

SERVICE

Criterion VII.

FACULTY

Criterion VIII. A.

Criterion VIII. B.

Criterion VIII. C.

STUDENTS

Criterion IX. A.

Criterion IX. B.

Criterion IX. C.

Criterion IX. D.

EVALUATION AND PLANNING

Criterion X. A.

Criterion X. B.

APPENDIX A

NMSU Organizational Chart

APPENDIX B

College Organizational Chart

APPENDIX C

Department Organizational Chart

APPENDIX D

Faculty Curricula Vitae

APPENDIX E

Student Handbook

APPENDIX F

Syllabi for Core MPH Courses

ATTACHMENTS (ENCLOSURES)

Program brochures

Recruitment and application materials

Field experience handbook

Current NMSU Graduate Catalog

PREFACE

The Master of Public Health (MPH) in Community Health Education at New Mexico State University (NMSU) is a new program. The first three students were admitted in the Spring semester of 1996. In just three years the program has grown to a current enrollment of 27 students.

In addition to the MPH program, the Department of Health Science also houses a well-established SABPAC-approved Bachelor of Community Health degree program with 120 student majors.

MISSION, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

CRITERION I.

The program shall have a clearly formulated and publicly stated mission with supporting goals and objectives.

Documentation Part 1

A clear and concise mission statement for the program as a whole.

As stated in the current New Mexico State University (NMSU) Graduate Catalog, the mission of the Department of Health Science (and the MPH program) is to preserve and enhance the health of the public and prevent illness and injury through education, research and service programs. This mission statement, which reflects the collaborative thinking and vision of the faculty, students and community leaders, includes both the undergraduate and graduate programs.

Documentation Part 2

One or more goal statements for each major function by which the program intends to attain its mission, including instruction, research and service.

DEPARTMENT GOAL STATEMENTS

Education - The primary responsibility of the Department of Health Science is to provide quality education in the areas of public health at the undergraduate and graduate levels.

Research - The Department of Health Science supports the advancement of knowledge and enrichment of its academic programs through research and other creative endeavors. Please see Criterion VI for a description of the department's philosophy on research.

Public Service - The Department of Health Science provides public service that advances the profession and meets the education and health needs of people of New Mexico and beyond.

PROGRAM GOAL STATEMENT

Research and Public Service - The MPH program serves to strengthen linkages and maintain cooperative relationships between the MPH program and the NM Department of Health, community health-related agencies, and the communities of southern New Mexico in order to foster applied research, public service and to ensure that the knowledge gained through the program’s instructional efforts are applied to the health-related needs of southern New Mexico.

The MPH strives to conduct research in community health focusing on: (a) working with local agencies and communities to assess and prioritize health needs and issues of populations living along the US-Mexican international border, (b) communicating these needs and health priorities to stakeholders and constituency groups, (c) identifying external sources of funding that may help communities address these health priorities, (d) program interventions, including educational methods and processes, and the evaluation of the resultant effects including what people know, how they learn, and how they use information to improve, protect and restore their health; (e) methods of motivating people to improve and protect their health; (f) evaluation, analysis and documentation of community health behavior skills that are essential in maintaining a healthy life style. Public service and outreach activities are achieved through close working relationships with the professionals in the field; through professional societies by serving on editorial boards and reviewing research proposals; and by providing consultation to official and voluntary agencies.

PROGRAM GOALS

Related to the departmental mission are the MPH program goals, described in further detail in the next section and also in Criterion V. C., Documentation Part 1:

  1. GOAL: To prepare community health educators who have knowledge of community health and public health, health promotion and disease prevention.
  2. GOAL: To prepare community health educators for health education responsibilities in program planning, development, implementation, and evaluation.
  3. GOAL: To prepare community health educators to plan and deliver health education programs that reflect cultural sensitivity and which best address health needs among populations living along the US-Mexico border.
  4. GOAL: To prepare community health educators to apply appropriate research principles and methods in health education, administer health education programs, and advance the profession of health education.
  5. GOAL: To engage graduate students and faculty in the department in community based activities through education research and service.
  6. GOAL: To provide expertise in the resolution of international, national, state, and local issues related to the provision of health promotion and illness prevention services, especially among under-served populations.

Documentation Part 3

A set of measurable objectives relating to each major function through which the program intends to achieve its goals of instruction, research and service.

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR THE MPH PROGRAM:

  1. GOAL: To prepare community health educators who have knowledge of community health and public health, health promotion and disease prevention
  1. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will demonstrate knowledge of the basic foundations of public health in the areas of biostatistics, epidemiology, health administration, and environmental health, as well as in the psycho-social aspects of community health, and how each area contributes to the health education program planning and/or evaluation process
  2. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will demonstrate knowledge of the field of public health and the professional role of community health educators
  1. GOAL: To prepare community health educators for health education responsibilities in program planning, development, implementation, and evaluation.
  1. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will demonstrate the ability to apply community needs assessment information (both primary and secondary data) in planning an appropriate health education interventions.
  2. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will demonstrate knowledge of various models of behavior change, including community organization and empowerment strategies, in planning health education programs to promote community health.
  3. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will design and conduct program evaluation and research studies, to apply quantitative and qualitative methods, and computer-based data-processing skills.
  4. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will complete a community agency-based field experience that will include planning, implementing, and evaluating intervention programs.
  1. GOAL: To prepare community health educators to plan and deliver health education programs that reflect cultural sensitivity and which best address health needs among populations living along the US-Mexico border.
  1. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will apply knowledge related to the important role cultural beliefs and practices play in a population’s health practices in developing culturally appropriate, relevant, and sensitive health education programs.
  1. GOAL: To prepare community health educators to apply appropriate research principles and methods in health education, administer health education programs, and advance the profession of community health education.
  1. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will conduct thorough reviews of literature, use appropriate qualitative and quantitative research methods, and apply research to health education practice.
  2. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will obtain acceptance and support for health education programs, develop and manage fiscal and human resources, and exercise organizational leadership skills in administering health education programs.
  3. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will critically analyze current and future needs in health education, develop an awareness of the various associations within the profession, create a plan for personal growth in the profession, subscribe to and be able to relate the importance of a code of ethics to professional practice.
  1. GOAL: To engage graduate students and faculty in the department in community based activities through education, research and service.
  1. OBJECTIVE: To incorporate community based activities in the program curriculum.
  2. OBJECTIVE: Establish collaboration between students and faculty and community agencies as consultants and in scholarly and evaluative research.
  3. OBJECTIVE: Establish collaboration between students and faculty and community agencies in community service activities.
  1. GOAL: To provide expertise in the resolution of international, national, state, and local issues related to the provision of health promotion and illness prevention services, especially among under-served populations.
  1. OBJECTIVE: To actively engage students and faculty in research in the area of provision of health promotion and illness prevention services among under-served populations.
  2. OBJECTIVE: Engage students and faculty, in collaboration with community groups, in the analysis of policies related to the provision of health promotion and illness prevention services in under-served populations.

Documentation Part 4

A description of the manner in which mission, goals and objectives are developed, monitored and periodically revised and the manner in which they are made available to the public.

The program mission, goals and objectives were developed when the program was created in 1996. They are reviewed and revised annually by department faculty and by the department's external advisory committee. Input is also solicited from graduate research and teaching assistants. The mission and goal statements are made available to the public on request, and via departmental brochures and web pages.

Documentation Part 5

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

This criterion is met. The Department of Health Science has a clearly formulated and publicly stated mission with supporting goals and objectives.

New Mexico State University has a university-wide commitment to assessing the effectiveness of all departments in academic achievement/student learning, research and public service. Each year, all departments are required to prepare and submit annual outcomes assessment reports, which are reviewed by a university-wide committee that provides feedback to each department. In addition, department faculty, the department head and the college dean review the department's annual outcome assessment report. Each year changes are made to improve the program, based on data collected and analyzed.

During the past several years New Mexico State University has been engaged in a range of activities in support of institutional planning. One significant initiative was a strategic planning effort culminating in final recommendations from the Strategic Planning Committee in March 1998. An equally significant, institution-wide effort was the three-year program review process, which served as the basis for the institutional self-study in preparation for the North Central Association's (NCA) consideration of the university's reaccredidation (NMSU was reaccredited by NCA until 2008). A third institutional planning and assessment mechanism was the NCA evaluation team visit, which generated a very supportive final report and recommendations for further institutional consideration. In addition, our colleges and university administration are continually engaged in planning and the refinement of their program directions and priorities. Planning also is done through existing budgeting processes at all levels of the university and through established procedures for governance.

ORGANIZATIONAL SETTING – EXTERNAL

Criterion II. A.

The program shall be an integral part of an accredited institution of higher education.

Documentation Part 1

A brief description of the institution in which the program is located, along with the names of accrediting bodies (other than CEPH) to which the institution responds.

New Mexico State University is the only land-grant university that is classified as a Carnegie Research I University, U.S. Department of Education-designated Minority Institution, Hispanic Serving Institution, and NASA Space Grant University.

New Mexico State University is a thriving center of higher education deeply rooted in the tricultural tradition of the Southwest. Situated at the gateway to Mexico, the university’s 6,250-acre campus is among the largest in the world. Founded in 1888 as Las Cruces College, the university was established the following year as a land-grant college by an act of the Legislative assembly of the Territory of New Mexico in accordance with provisions of the Morrill Act. As New Mexico College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts, the institution grew steadily over the next 71 years, fulfilling its purpose as a nonsectarian center of learning in the broadest possible service to the state and nation.

The growth and maturity of the institution was formally recognized in 1960 when the constitution of New Mexico was amended to change its' name to New Mexico State University. Today, the university’s students can major in 75 areas of undergraduate study in six undergraduate colleges. The Graduate School offers 51 areas of study at the master’s level, 4 areas at the Specialist in Education level, and 24 at the doctoral level. The university is accredited to offer degrees through the doctorate by the North Central Association. In addition, many departments and colleges are further accredited by organizations serving their special fields.

In its growth and expansion, the university has achieved distinction in many special fields. It has on its campus one of the three full-time planetary observatories in the nation, as well as one of the largest computer centers in the Southwest. New Mexico State University ranks in the top two percent of institutions in the nation for providing personal computers for students. The university is among the top 100 colleges and universities across the nation in research and development, classified as a Carnegie I Research University, with the total research budget estimated to be more than $300 million.

The university’s central campus is located as the southernmost interchange of the Pan American Highway (Interstate 25) in southern New Mexico. Also bordering the campus is Interstate 10, the principal east-west route across the southern United States. The university is adjacent to Las Cruces, New Mexico (population 70,000), and is less than 50 miles from the international border cities of El Paso, Texas, and Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico, with their combined populations of more than one million.

Most departments at NMSU offer academic programs leading to one or more advanced degrees. The research facilities (laboratories, instruments, and library) are modern and up-to-date. In addition, the university maintains organized research units outside the departmental structure. These research units aid research, promote an inter-departmental approach, and enhance the teaching of participating faculty members. They do not offer programs leading to advanced degrees, but they may provide research training to graduate students dedicated to various projects under faculty supervision.

ACCREDITATION

New Mexico State University has been accredited since 1926 by the North Central Association of Colleges and Secondary Schools as a degree-granting institution. The university was accredited in 1954 by the American Association of University Women.

Names of the accrediting bodies (other than CEPH) to which the University is responsible:

Documentation Part 2

An organizational chart of the university indicating the program’s relationship to the other components of the institution.

Appendices A, B, and C include the organizational charts of the University, College and Department, respectively.

Documentation Part 3

A description of the program’s relationship to the university’s system of governance, to amplify the diagrammatic representation, including budgeting and resource allocation; personnel recruitment, selection and advancement; and establishment of academic standards and policies.

Authority for the policies of the university is vested in a five-member Board of Regents, appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the State Senate. The membership, appointment, qualifications, and terms of the members of the board and their removal and replacement are governed by the constitution and laws of the State of New Mexico. The Faculty Senate chairperson and the president of Associated Students of New Mexico State University (ASNMSU) are ex-officio members of the Board of Regents. The board delegates authority for the internal management of the institution to the president.

The president is the chief executive officer of the university and is directly responsible to the Board of Regents for the overall program of the university. The president is responsible for the execution of such measures as the Board of Regents may enact regarding the administration of the university and of all approved measures presented by the Faculty Senate or the various councils of the university; however, administration of these matters may be delegated by the president.

The Administrative Council is composed of the president, the vice presidents, the assistant to the president, the director of the Physical Plant, the director of University Communications, the director of personnel, and the Legislative Liaison. The president chairs the council; in the president's absence, the executive vice president acts in this capacity. In addition to serving as members of the Administrative Council, each vice president has specific areas of responsibility.

The Academic Deans Council is composed of the president, the chief academic officer, the vice president for administration, the academic deans, the dean of the University Library, and the Faculty Senate chair. The functions of the Academic Deans Council are as follows: Provide an administrative vehicle for the dissemination of information, provide ready pooling of ideas, and provide a testing ground for the matters of concern to the administration of the university; make recommendations and discuss with the president problems relating to improvement in the administration of the institution; act as a sounding board and evaluation body for new ideas emanating from the staff or administration; consider ways and means of improving the academic quality and other aspects of the institution, including proposals dealing with academic policies and programs; coordinate efforts of the various deans and provide for desirable uniformity in carrying out institutional policy; provide administration-level coordination between the various agencies, colleges, and schools of the university; stimulate other official groups in the full development of action within respective areas; establish, from time to time, special committees and groups to render specialized service in developing recommendations in given areas; and consider recommendations emanating from the Advisory Council on Administrative Policy when appropriate.

The Faculty Senate has legislative jurisdiction over policies affecting the university academic mission in regard to education, research, and service, including the definitions of purpose and objectives. Policy statements approved by the Faculty Senate are subject to the acceptance/veto of the university president. If the president vetoes a bill, a two-thirds vote of the Faculty Senate may return the proposition to the president and, if the president does not rescind the veto in five days, he/she will present the proposition to the Board of Regents with a request for consideration and action. The Faculty Senate is composed of three categories of members: (1) the elected chair of the Faculty Senate; (2) 54 elected senators; and (3) ex officio non-voting members who shall be the chief academic officer, chair and vice chair of the Advisory Council on Administrative Policy, registrar, vice president for student affairs, deans of each of the academic colleges and schools, chair of the Graduate Assembly, and the president and vice president of the Associated Students

The dean of each college is responsible to the chief academic officer (Executive Vice President) for the effective leadership and administration of the college. The dean provides the environment for the promotion of excellence in teaching, research, and professional service.

The department head is expected to be the academic leader of the departmental faculty and is responsible for ensuring that highly qualified faculty are employed. The department head has no more important task than ensuring teaching excellence. Encouragement and support of good teaching must be given to faculty, especially new faculty. Leadership of the faculty implies working closely with the faculty on the development and sustenance of departmental courses and the stimulation and encouragement of faculty development. A performance evaluation of each faculty member is carried out at least once a year and is made in the positive vein of professional development. Evaluation of the progress of tenure-track faculty is made in consultation with senior department faculty and in accordance with the highest national standards of faculty performance. The department head is also responsible for encouraging the national and international professional contacts of the faculty within the constraints of the departmental budget. This implies appropriate travel and bringing well-known professionals to the campus. The department head is responsible for ensuring an effective departmental evaluation of teaching, and for advisement of student departmental majors. In addition, the department head must ensure the effective administration of the department, including keeping the faculty fully informed of department, college, and university matters. Routine and special reports and other matters must be handled accurately and on time. Effective supervision and development of the department budget is important, and the department head will keep the faculty informed on budgetary matters. All research and program contracts are carefully supervised, both for fiscal integrity and academic appropriateness.

The department head is expected to be an advocate of the department, yet at the same time appreciate the concerns and priorities of the college and university. The most important department activities in the development of faculty, programs, research, and service are done in close partnership with the office of the dean of the college. The department head is responsible to the dean of the college for all the activities of the department, and must keep the dean apprized of all department activities and problems. He/she is responsible for ensuring that department, college, and university regulations are enforced. For faculty searches, the department head will inform the search committee chairperson if an underutilization memorandum is received from the executive vice president's office for purposes of meeting affirmative action goals.

Documentation Part 4

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

This criterion is met. The Department of Health Science is an integral part of an accredited institution of higher education.

ORGANIZATIONAL SETTING – INTERNAL

Criterion II. B.

The program shall provide an organizational setting conducive to teaching and learning, research and service. The organizational setting shall facilitate interdisciplinary communication, cooperation and collaboration and shall foster the development by the program of professional public health values, concepts and ethics.

Documentation Part 1

An organizational chart of the program, indicating relationships of its components with the administration of the school or other unit in which the program is located.

Appendices A, B, and C include the organizational charts of the university, college and department, respectively.

Documentation Part 2

Description of the relationships indicated in the diagrammatic representation

RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PROGRAMS

The Master of Public Health (MPH) in Community Health Education degree offered by the Department of Health Science in the College of Health and Social Services complements the existing Bachelor of Community Health degree offered by the department. While requiring a core set of courses, the degree is interdisciplinary in design to allow integration with other graduate programs at NMSU (e.g. social work, sociology, anthropology). The program does not duplicate any projected programs or others that are currently in existence at the university.

RELATIONSHIP TO UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION

The MPH degree advances health education at NMSU to the graduate level. It is a direct extension of the existing Bachelor of Community Health which prepares health educators for entry-level positions. Experience from similar combined BCH and MPH in community health education programs (East Stroudsburg State and Southern Connecticut State University) has demonstrated that the establishment of an MPH program enhances recruitment of both students and faculty and increases prospects for obtaining external funding for research activities. In effect, the inclusion of the MPH program serves to elevate the overall quality of instruction and research at the undergraduate level.

As other states are likely to follow the example set by California, New Jersey, and North Carolina in requiring the MPH degree of its health educators, offering the MPH as a complement to the existing BCH will help its graduates better meet national hiring trends in the future. Those with an MPH, or a master’s degree in a health education-related area, are also allowed to waive two years of the three years experience required by the New Mexico Department of Health for entry in a Health Educator II position.

RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING GRADUATE PROGRAMS

The program is designed to complement, rather than duplicate, any existing graduate programs at NMSU and others in the State. In fact, other university graduate courses are incorporated into the MPH program as concentration or elective courses. (In the non-thesis option MPH students are required to complete a minimum of nine credits of electives courses from among several health and education-related programs at NMSU.)

A tentative verbal agreement has been established between NMSU and the University of New Mexico School of Medicine (UNM-SOM) MPH in Community/Preventive Medicine program as follows. Students in the MPH program at NMSU may complete a concentration in epidemiology from UNM. This concentration comes from the completion of advanced epidemiology courses (such as courses in chronic disease and infectious disease epidemiology) offered through the UNM-SOM MPH program. To date, no students from NMSU have taken advantage of this opportunity.

Documentation Part 3

Description of the manner in which interdisciplinary coordination, cooperation and collaboration are supported.

The Department of Health Science has established a close working relationship with a number of agencies/departments both on- and off-campus.

ON-CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS

  1. The Department of Health Science works closely with the Department of Nursing and the Department of Social Work (which are also in the College of Health and Social Services). For example, nursing faculty have been an integral part of the W.K. Kellogg grant for Graduate Medical and Nursing Education (GMNE) entitled "Community Partnerships in Graduate Medical and Nursing Education" which falls under the administrative structure of the Department of Health Science.
  2. Department of Health Science faculty have recently collaborated on a large research grant with faculty from the Department of Social Work and from the Department of Curriculum and Instruction.
  3. Numerous outer-departmental faculty have served on Department of Health Science graduate committees.
  4. The Department of Health Science administers several large service grants including:
    1. Southern Area Health Education Center (SoAHEC)
    2. Border Health Education Training Center (BHETC)
    3. Allied Health Career Opportunity Program (AHCOP)
    4. Border Epidemiology and Environmental Health Center (BEEC)

OFF-CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS

A partial list of field experience sites utilized by the undergraduate and graduate programs during the past three years is provided in Criterion IV, Documentation Part 8. These external agencies, particularly the New Mexico Public Health Office (District III) and the New Mexico Border Health Office, both in Las Cruces, have proven to be valuable local resources. Employees of these two agencies (and others) have served as instructors, guest lecturers, members of the department advisory committee, field experience supervisors, and contacts for technical information. Additional guest speakers have been utilized from El Paso, Albuquerque, and as far away as Phoenix. A relationship has also been established with the Indian Health Service in Northern New Mexico via student field experiences and through the Department of Health Science AHCOP program.

Documentation Part 4

Definition of the professional public health values, concepts and ethics to which the program is committed and a description of how these are operationalized.

Consistent with the Institutes of Medicine (IOM) The Future of Public Health (1988) publication, the department and MPH program are committed to the IOM Committee’s definition of public health as "fulfilling society’s interest in assuring conditions in which people can be healthy". This is reflected in the MPH program’s mission statement and in its goals. It seeks to educate practitioners to apply scientific and technical knowledge through organized community effort to promote the public’s health and prevent disease and injury. Though the department is developmentally not equivalent to a school of public health, it seeks to fulfill its dual role or responsibilities to both develop knowledge and to produce well-trained professionals and practitioners, as well as to have faculty and students involved in public service outreach efforts with the local department of health and other health-related community agencies. Its success in meeting these goals are measured each year as part of the department’s outcomes assessment and program effectiveness evaluation efforts.

The public health perspectives and values of departmental faculty are not only the in the departmental mission statement and goals, but also in the learning objectives that guide the curriculum as well (see Criterion V. C. Documentation Part 1). These learning objectives are based upon the need to:

  1. educate students regarding the areas of knowledge basic to public health (biostatistics, epidemiology, environmental health sciences, health services administration, and social and behavioral sciences),
  2. ensure that students acquire skills and experience in the application of basic public health concepts of specialty knowledge to the solution of community health problems, and
  3. ensure that students demonstrate the integration of knowledge through a culminating experience (the field experience and other experiences described later in this report).

The Standards for the Preparation of Graduate-Level Health Educators (Society for Public Health Education, Inc. & American Association for Health Education, 1997) led in the development of learning objectives included under Goals II and IV for the NMSU MPH program. Healthy People 2000 and state and local needs were also influential in the development of these learning objectives. The learning objectives reflect the following themes:

  1. Culture, economics, political power and organization, social inequality and education are factors that promote or discourage individual and collective health behaviors and impact upon the community’s disease, disability, and mortality rates. The prevention of disease, disability and premature death requires social action to address these factors.
  2. The application of epidemiology and biostatistical methods to assess and monitor the health of communities and to identify patterns of disease and their social correlates are essential components of public health.
  3. Optimal public health requires the translation of new knowledge and information into effective public policies that address health problems at appropriate levels (international, national, regional, state and local) and academic public health programs have a role in the collaboration with governmental leaders.
  4. Changes in individual health behavior may be influenced by changes in public policy, but are best optimized through interventions that educate communities and which motive health lifestyle changes at both the individual and community levels. Use of information technologies and communications media are essential to success in such efforts.
  5. Research programs to promote healthy behavior must incorporate the profession’s principles of ethics including honesty in interactions with others, promotion of both individual and collective good, and prevention of harm, respect for the self-determination of others, and promotion of equitable treatment of all persons.

These values and guiding principles are included in the MPH curriculum.

Documentation Part 5

Identification of written policies that are illustrative of the program’s commitment to fair and ethical dealings.

Admission to the Department of Health Science is based upon policies designed to treat students fairly and objectively. In addition to NMSU graduate school admission policies and procedures, the department has developed its' own admission policies which are published in the NMSU Graduate catalog and on the department web pages. Admission decisions are based on a majority vote of the graduate faculty after review of the applicant's materials.

New Mexico State University is committed to a diverse student body as described in part by the Center for International Programs. This office facilitates the admission of all international students.

The Department of Health Science strongly promotes an environment of academic integrity. The NMSU Division of Student Affairs publishes the Student Handbook which clearly specifies a code of conduct and discipline policies and procedures. Further, the Graduate School specifies university-wide expectations of academic integrity.

Documentation Part 6

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

This criterion is met. New Mexico State University provides an organizational setting conducive to teaching and learning, research and service. NMSU facilitates interdisciplinary communication, cooperation and collaboration and fosters the development by the Department of Health Science of professional health values, concepts and ethics.

GOVERNANCE

Criterion III.

The program administration and faculty shall have clearly defined rights and responsibilities concerning program governance and academic policies. Where appropriate, students shall have participatory roles in program governance.

Documentation Part 1

Description of the program’s administrative, governance and committee structure and processes, particularly as they affect:

  1. general program policy development;
  2. planning;
  3. budget and resource allocation;
  4. student recruitment, admission and award of degrees;
  5. faculty recruitment, retention, promotion and tenure;
  6. academic standards and policies;
  7. research and service expectations and policies.

The Department of Health Science is bound to the policies and procedures specified by New Mexico State University for administrative structure, governance, and committee structures. Further, the College of Health and Social Services specifies additional policies and procedures as does the NMSU Graduate School.

Within the department, all full-time and particularly tenure-line faculty are involved with the program's administration and governance through various formal and informal processes. The department has several standing committees, which ensure faculty involvement on a formal level. In addition, faculty meetings are held at least monthly to discuss emerging issues on a more informal basis.

  1. General program policy development is completed by the department head with the consultation, advice and approval of program faculty and the appropriate committee(s).
  2. Planning is completed by the department head with the consultation, advice and approval of program faculty and the appropriate committee(s).
  3. Budget and resource allocation to each department is determined by the college dean, who receives instruction and general (I&G) money allocated to each college by central administration.
  4. Student recruitment, admission and awarding of degrees is accomplished by program faculty, department head, college dean, and graduate school dean in accordance with university policies and procedures and with the appropriate committees.
  5. Faculty recruitment, retention, promotion and tenure is accomplished by program faculty, department head, college dean, and graduate school dean in accordance with university policies and procedures and with the appropriate committees.
  6. Academic standards are maintained by program faculty, department head, college dean, and graduate school dean in accordance with university policies and procedures and with the appropriate committees.
  7. Research and service expectations are communicated to program faculty by the department promotion and tenure committee, the college promotion and tenure committee, the department head and the college dean.

The Department of Health Science also utilizes an external advisory committee consisting of 12 members of the professional community and alumni plus 4 graduate students currently enrolled in the program.

Documentation Part 2

A list of standing and important ad hoc committees, with a statement of charge and composition.

DEPARTMENTAL COMMITTEES

CHES Continuing Education Review

Meister (Chair), Krishnan, Brandon + other CHES certified individuals

Department Curriculum Committee

Mondragon (Chair), Arnold, Buckingham, Meister, Krishnan, Velarde

Department Web Page Update

Pitblado, Arnold

Environmental Health Degree Development

Arnold (Chair), Buckingham, Krishnan, Meister, Mondragon

ETA Sigma Gamma Faculty Advisor

Krishnan

Graduate Program Coordinator

Arnold

Library Liaison

Mondragon

MPH Admissions

Arnold (Chair), Buckingham, Krishnan, Meister, Mondragon, Velarde

Outcomes Assessment Coordinator

Krishnan

Promotion And Tenure

Buckingham (Chair), Mondragon + one other faculty member in the college

Undergraduate Program Coordinator

Krishnan

Department faculty are also elected or appointed to college committees including:

COLLEGE COMMITTEES

Admissions Appeals Committee

Buckingham, Meister + other faculty members in the college

Appeals Committee

Krishnan + other faculty members in the college

Curriculum Committee

Mondragon + other faculty members in the college

Interdisciplinary Education Committee

Mondragon + other faculty members in the college

Promotion & Tenure

Buckingham + other faculty members in the college

Research Council

Mondragon (Chair), Krishnan + other faculty members in the college

Strategic Planning Committee

Arnold, Meister, Krishnan + other faculty members in the college

Department faculty are also elected or appointed to university committees including:

UNIVERSITY COMMITTEES

Athletic Council

Buckingham + other university faculty

Faculty Senate

Krishnan, Mondragon + other university faculty

Faculty Senate Committee On Committees

Mondragon + other university faculty

Faculty Senate Library Committee

Krishnan + other university faculty

General Education Assessment

Arnold + other university faculty

University Research Council

Krishnan + other university faculty

Visiting Professor Selection Committee

Buckingham + other university faculty

 

DESCRIPTION OF COMMITTEES

Documentation Part 3

A list, including membership, of program, school and university committees through which program faculty contribute to the activities of the program, school and university.

This list is included in the section above.

Documentation Part 4

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

This criterion is met. The program administration and faculty have clearly defined rights and responsibilities concerning program governance and academic policies. The list of faculty membership on committees is evidence of this.

RESOURCES

Criterion IV.

The program shall have resources adequate to fulfill its stated mission and goals, and it’s instructional, research and service objectives.

Documentation Part 1

A clearly formulated program budget statement, showing sources of all available funds and expenditures by major categories, since the last accreditation visit or for the last five years whichever is longer. If the program does not have a separate budget, it must present an estimate of available funds and expenditures by major categories and explain the basis of the estimate.

ACADEMIC PROGRAMS:

The following budget for the Department of Health Science includes both the undergraduate and graduate programs. Since the graduate program originated in 1996, data is only available for the past four (4) years.

The MPH Program portion of the budget is difficult to estimate since the Department of Health Science operates with one budget for all academic programs (which are the graduate MPH program and the undergraduate BCH program). However, one reasonable estimate would be to split the budget as a percentage according to the number of FTE faculty assigned to teach in the undergraduate and graduate programs. As indicated in the next section (Criterion IV, Documentation Part 2), there are 3.3 FTE faculty assigned to teach in the undergraduate program and 2.95 FTE faculty assigned to teach in the graduate program. The total is 6.25 FTE teaching faculty. Thus, the MPH Program percentage is 2.95/6.25 = 47%. Since this is only an estimate, it seems reasonable to round up to 50% with the summary statement that the Department of Health Science's budget is estimated to be equally split between the undergraduate and graduate programs.

INSTRUCTION AND GENERAL (I&G) BUDGET

FY 1999

FY 1998

FY 1997

FY 1996

Administrative staff salaries (department head + secretary)

$92,979

87820

87749

87431

Department administrative operating expenses

$6,000

4000

4000

0

Department operating expenses

$21,000

20000

20390

22300

Equipment (new)

$5,000

0

0

0

Faculty salary (4.5 FTE in 1999)

$210,368

222915

223669

167366

Graduate teaching assistants

$20,900

20000

0

0

SUBTOTAL

 

 

 

 

WEEKEND COLLEGE

FY 1999

FY 1998

FY 1997

FY 1996

Part-time faculty salary to teach 4 courses per year

$12,132

13406

15000

 

SUBTOTAL

$12,132

13,406

15,000

 

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION SALARY SAVINGS

FY 1999

FY 1998

FY 1997

FY 1996

Part-time faculty salary to teach 8 general education courses per year

$33,456

48315

49548

8222

SUBTOTAL

$33,456

48,315

49,548

8,222

INDIRECT OVERHEAD RETURN

FY 1999

FY 1998

FY 1997

FY 1996

Graduate research assistants (six part-time positions)

$30,000

10000

14350

0

Photocopier

$3,000

3000

1000

500

Faculty travel

$4,000

9000

21000

8000

Office workstudy students

$3,000

5000

1500

3000

Equipment

$3,000

5000

0

8000

Misc.

$3,000

10000

0

500

SUBTOTAL

 

 

 

 

 

FY 1999

FY 1998

FY 1997

FY 1996

TOTAL BUDGET FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCE ACADEMIC PROGRAMS

$447,835

$458,456

$438,206

$305,319

SERVICE (GRANT AND CONTRACT) PROGRAMS:

The following budget is for the Southern Area Health Education Center (SoAHEC) and the Border Health Education and Training Center (BHETC), which fall under the administrative structure of the Department of Health Science. SoAHEC also includes a W.K. Kellogg grant for Graduate Medical and Nursing Education (GMNE) entitled "Community Partnerships in Graduate Medical and Nursing Education."

STATE AHEC

FY 1999

FY 1998

FY 1997

FY 1996

Personnel

$45,454

44570

36731

24176

Program

$20,717

23860

31456

43066

Staff travel

$5,581

5721

4678

5000

Supplies

$6,952

5254

6540

10817

Indirect costs

$6,296

6352

6352

6231

SUBTOTAL

 

 

 

 

FEDERAL AHEC

FY 1999

FY 1998

FY 1997

FY 1996

Personnel

$14,943

22536

18943

3352

Program

$29,500

27160

8484

22479

Staff travel

$3,673

3073

1260

5829

Supplies

$3,243

2512

0

8691

Indirect costs

$4,108

4423

2295

2884

SUBTOTAL

 

 

 

 

BORDER HETC

FY 1999

FY 1998

FY 1997

FY 1996

Personnel

$26,325

21834

22820

21430

Program

$28,907

38833

24699

31652

Staff travel

$5,000

339

2551

0

Supplies

$4,247

3473

5811

0

Indirect costs

$5,158

5158

4256

4247

SUBTOTAL

 

 

 

 

GMNE-KELLOG

FY 1999

FY 1998

FY 1997

FY 1996

Personnel

$90,859

71065

65835

0

Program

$29000

46400

57000

0

Staff travel

$10000

7000

7000

0

Supplies

$11206

16600

12000

0

Indirect costs

$0

0

0

0

SUBTOTAL

$

 

 

 

 

The following budget is for the Allied Health Career Opportunity Program (AHCOP), which falls under the administrative structure of the Department of Health Science (Dr. Delfi Mondragon, Principle Investigator):

AHCOP

FY 1999

FY 1998

FY 1997

FY 1996

Personnel

$103,122

95,784

99,140

93,578

Program

$62,555

65,630

59,100

57,296

Staff travel

$1,000

2,300

2,500

2,921

Supplies

$2,100

3,000

5,000

3,500

Indirect costs

$13,502

13,337

13,259

12,584

SUBTOTAL

 

 

 

 

The following budget is for the Border Health Office (BHO) grant, which falls under the administrative structure of the Department of Health Science (Dr. Stephen D. Arnold, Principle Investigator):

BHO

FY 1999

FY 1998

FY 1997

FY 1996

Personnel

163,800

160,635

138,346

59,845

Program

16,292

15,977

13,760

5,952

Staff travel

9,000

8,826

7,601

3,288

Supplies

13,500

13,239

11,402

4,932

Indirect costs

16,133

15,821

13,626

5,894

SUBTOTAL

$218,725

214,500

184,737

79,913

The following budget is for the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) grant, which falls under the administrative structure of the Department of Health Science (Dr. Satya Krishnan, Principle Investigator):

NIJ

FY 1999

FY 1998

FY 1997

FY 1996

Personnel

 

na

na

na

Program

 

na

na

na

Staff travel

 

na

na

na

Supplies

 

na

na

na

Indirect costs

 

na

na

na

SUBTOTAL

$152,506

na

na

na

 

FY 1999

FY 1998

FY 1997

FY 1996

TOTAL BUDGET FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCE SERVICE (GRANT AND CONTRACT) PROGRAMS (AHEC, BHETC, GMNE, AHCOP, BHO, NIJ)

$904,676

$750,714

$682,447

$439,646

Documentation Part 2

A concise statement or chart concerning faculty resources, showing number and percent time of faculty allocated to the program and computing a student/faculty ratio for the community health education program. (FTE faculty and FTE student numbers should be used and these should be consistent with FTE faculty and student numbers presented in sections VIII and IX.)

FTE FACULTY DISTRIBUTION FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAMS (UNDERGRADUATE AND GRADUATE PROGRAMS):

NAME

TITLE

DEPARTMENT FTE ASSIGNMENT (ADMINISTRATIVE)

UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM FTE ASSIGNMENT (TEACHING)

GRADUATE PROGRAM FTE ASSIGNMENT (TEACHING)

TOTAL FTE ASSIGNMENT

Arnold,

Stephen

Academic Department Head

0.75

0.125

0.125

1.0

Brandon,

Jeffrey

Associate College Dean

0.75

0.125

0.125

1.0

Buckingham, Robert

Professor

0.0

0.675

0.325

1.0

Krishnan,

Satya

Assistant Professor

0.0

0.375

0.625

1.0

Meister,

Edward

Assistant Professor

0.0

0.50

0.50

1.0

Mondragon,

Delfi

Associate Professor

0.0

0.50

0.50

1.0

Velarde, Lily

College Assistant Professor

0.0

0.75

0.25

1.0

Escobedo,

Luis

Adjunct Assistant Professor

0.0

0.0

0.25

0.25

Pitblado,

Jeffrey

College Assistant Professor

0.0

0.25

0.25

0.5

TOTALS

 

 

 

 

 

During the Spring semester of 1999 the Department of Health Science had 66 "pre" and 48 "full" community health majors for a total of 114 undergraduate majors. With 3.3 FTE faculty assigned to the undergraduate program (from table above), this calculates to a student/faculty ratio of 35/1 for the undergraduate program. Advising of the 66 "pre" majors is done by the full-time College Advising Coordinator (Carol MacAllister) while advising for the 48 "full" majors is shared by the seven full-time faculty listed above.

For the graduate program, during the Spring semester of 1999 the Department of Health Science had 27 graduate students enrolled. With 2.95 FTE faculty assigned to the graduate program (see table above), this calculates to a student/faculty ratio of 9/1 for the graduate program.

All student enrollments (see table above) are based on total head count. Please see Criterion IX. A. Documentation Part 4 for the graduate FTE student calculation.

Additional part-time faculty and graduate students are assigned to teach general education courses as follows:

 

FTE FACULTY DISTRIBUTION FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAMS (GENERAL EDUCATION CLASSES):

NAME

TITLE

DEPARTMENT FTE ASSIGNMENT (ADMINISTRATIVE)

UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM FTE ASSIGNMENT (TEACHING)

GRADUATE PROGRAM FTE ASSIGNMENT (TEACHING)

TOTAL FTE ASSIGNMENT

Hawe,

Pearl

College Assistant Professor

0.0

0.25

0.0

0.25

Hepp,

Ellen

College Assistant Professor

0.0

0.25

0.0

0.25

McDaniels,

Eileen

College Assistant Professor

0.0

0.25

0.0

0.25

Variable

Graduate Teaching Assistant

0.0

1.0

0.0

1.0

TOTALS

 

 

 

 

 

FTE STAFF DISTRIBUTION FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAMS (ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT):

NAME

TITLE

DEPARTMENT FTE ASSIGNMENT (ADMINISTRATIVE)

UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM FTE ASSIGNMENT (TEACHING)

GRADUATE PROGRAM FTE ASSIGNMENT (TEACHING)

TOTAL FTE ASSIGNMENT

Boykin,

Jane

Administrative Secretary II

1.0

n/a

n/a

1.0

Duncan,

Tore

Office Assistant

0.5

n/a

n/a

0.5

 

Documentation Part 3

A concise statement or chart concerning the availability of other personnel (administration and staff).

FTE DISTRIBUTION OF SERVICE PROGRAMS:

NAMEFlores, Janet

Program Coordinator

AHCOP

1.0

Hawe, Pearl

Education Outreach Coordinator

SoAHEC

1.0

Huffman, Debra

Administrative Secretary II

SoAHEC

1.0

Smith, Daryl

Program Coordinator

SoAHEC

1.0

Variable

Graduate Research Assistant

AHCOP

0.50

Variable

Administrative Assistant

BEC

0.5

Variable

Graduate Research Assistants

BHO

1.5

Variable

Student Employees

BHO

6.0

Variable

Research Assistants

NIJ

4.0

Variable

Office Assistant

SoAHEC

1.0

Vilchis, Hugo

College Assistant Professor

BEC

1.0

TOTALS

 

 

 

Documentation Part 4

A concise statement or chart concerning amount of space available to the program by purpose (offices, classrooms, common space for student use, etc.) and location.

The Department of Health Science has adequate space for offices, classrooms, a student computer lab, a student study area, and additional research projects:

TYPE OF SPACE

BUILDING

ROOM NUMBER

Conference Room/Resource Room

Academic Research C

110

Work-study office

Academic Research C

110-A

Copy and work room

Academic Research C

110-B

Faculty office

Academic Research C

110-C

Faculty office

Academic Research C

110-D

Department secretary

Academic Research C

110-E

Meeting room

Academic Research C

110-F

Department head office

Academic Research C

110-G

Waiting room

Academic Research C

100

Faculty office

Academic Research C

102

Faculty office

Academic Research C

103

Faculty office

Academic Research C

105

Faculty office

Academic Research C

107

Faculty office

Academic Research C

108

Graduate Assistants

Genesis Center

106-A

Graduate Assistants

Genesis Center

106-B

Classroom

Activity Center

201

AV Storage

Activity Center

201

Student study lounge

Genesis Center

106

Student computer lab

Breland Hall

159

Documentation Part 5

A concise statement or floor plan concerning laboratory space, including kind, quantity and special features or special equipment.

The classroom (listed above) in Activity Center is a teaching laboratory. It consists of moveable 2-seat tables to facilitate small-group discussions and numerous bulletin boards for health education displays. Audiovisual equipment includes: 1) a multi-media projector for laptop interface and power-point presentations, 2) overhead projector, 3) TV/VCR, 4) slide projector, 5) digital camera, 6) camcorder, 7) tape recorder, etc.

Documentation Part 6

A concise statement concerning the amount, location and types of computer facilities and resources for students, faculty, administration and staff.

All faculty, staff and graduate student offices in the Department of Health Science have a desktop Pentium computer (with Office 95/97 and Windows 95/98) and individual laser or DeskJet printers. The department also owns six (6) laptops which are shared. The student computer lab consists of 22 desktop computers with Office 95/97, Windows 95/98, and a networked laser printer. Some of the faculty and all of the student lab computers have statistical software programs. All campus computers are hard-wired directly to the campus mainframe for email and internet connections. Additional student computer labs for students are located throughout the campus.

Documentation Part 7

A concise statement of library/information resources available for program use.

The library has many resources available for students in the MPH program. In the R call number area, which includes health, medicine, and nursing, there are 18,534 book titles. The Department of Health Science has selected a core list of 25 journal titles that are currently subscribed to. In addition, there are about 300 journal titles in supporting areas such as psychology, nursing, and biology. The library provides access to the major indexes used for research in health: Medline and CINAHL. The library also has supporting indices including ERIC, PsycLit, and Science Citation Index. The library is a federal depository, selecting 60% of current federal documents, including many health-related items. The library provides a number of special services to students and faculty, including interlibrary loan, document delivery, bibliographic instruction, in-depth reference by appointment, and reciprocal borrowing privileges at many other libraries.

Documentation Part 8

A concise statement identifying field sites used during the last three years for student practice experiences.

The following is a partial list of field experience sites utilized by the undergraduate and graduate programs during the past three years. For a more detailed list, please see Criterion V. B., Documentation Part 4.

Documentation Part 9

A concise statement describing other community resources used during the last three years for instruction, research and service, indicating those where formal agreements exist.

The New Mexico Public Health Office (District III) and the New Mexico Border Health Office, both in Las Cruces, have proved to be valuable local resources. Employees of these two agencies (and others) have served as instructors, guest lecturers, members of the department advisory committee, field experience supervisors, and contacts for technical information. The department has had a large research/grant service contract with the New Mexico Border Health Office, discussed elsewhere in this document, for a number of years.

Documentation Part 10

Identification of outcome measures by which the program may judge the adequacy of its resources, along with data regarding the program’s performance against those measures over the last three years. As a minimum, the program must provide data on student-to-faculty ratio, program expenditures per full-time-equivalent student, and research dollars per full-time-equivalent faculty.

The department does not currently have in place outcome measures by which the program may judge the adequacy of its resources. This is an area currently under development. Specific suggestions from CEPH on common outcome measures of this type would be most appreciated.

114 Undergraduate students

3.3 FTE faculty assigned to the undergraduate program

Undergraduate student/faculty ratio = 35/1

21.8 FTE graduate students

2.95 FTE faculty assigned to the graduate program

Graduate student/faculty ratio = 7/1

$223,917 MPH program portion of budget for academic programs

21.8 FTE graduate students

MPH Program expenditures per student = $10,271

2.95 FTE MPH faculty (as calculated in Criterion IV, Documentation Part 2)

$452,338 MPH program portion of grant and contract dollars generated/year

Grant and contract dollars per FTE faculty = $153,334/year

Documentation Part 11

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

The greatest needs in the Department of Health Science, in terms of resources, are additional full-time tenure-line faculty. Currently there are 7.5 FTE faculty assigned to the undergraduate and graduate programs plus 1.75 FTE assigned to teach general education courses (for a combined total of 9.25 FTE). Of this 9.25 FTE only 4.0 FTE are in tenure-line positions with teaching as their primary assignment while an additional 2.0 FTE are tenure-line administrative positions (Arnold and Brandon). The remaining 3.25 FTE positions are temporary (and mostly part-time) non-tenure-line with uncertain funding.

Part-time instructors tend to have: a) limited availability for students, b) a marginal commitment to the department, and c) significant commitments to their primary place of employment which detracts from their contributions to the department, college, and the university.

 

INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS

Criterion V. A.

The program shall offer instructional programs reflecting its stated mission and goals, leading to the Master of Public Health (MPH) or equivalent professional masters degree in community health education. The program may offer other degrees, professional and academic, if consistent with its mission and resources.

The areas of knowledge basic to public health include:

  1. Biostatistics: collection, storage, retrieval, analysis, and interpretation of health data; design and analysis of health-related surveys and experiments; and concepts and practices of statistical data analysis.
  2. Epidemiology: distribution and determinants of disease, disabilities, and deaths in human populations; the characteristics and dynamics of human population; and the natural history of disease and the biological basis of health.
  3. Environmental Health Sciences: environmental factors including biological, physical, and chemical factors, which affect the health of a community.
  4. Health Services Administration: planning, organization, and administration, management, evaluation, and policy analysis of health programs.
  5. Social and Behavioral Sciences: Concepts and methods of social and behavioral sciences relevant to the identification and the solution of public health problems.

Documentation Part 1

Identification in matrix form of the program’s degree programs, showing the areas of specialization possible and distinguishing between those considered by the program to be professional degrees and those considered to be academic degrees. If the program offers degrees in a non-traditional format, these must be included in the matrix and identified as non-traditional.

DEGREE PROGRAMS OFFERED

AREA OF SPECIALIZATION

TYPE OF DEGREE

Master of Public Health

Community Health Education

Professional degree

The MPH degree is the only graduate degree offered in the Department of Health Science. The MPH program strives for academic excellence in training competent health professionals who will provide leadership, innovation, and technical expertise at local, state, national and international levels, and in particular United States and Mexico border health problems in rural communities. MPH graduates will have knowledge and understanding to facilitate and promote both risk reduction/primary prevention programs and sustainable system-wide social-political change by means of community organization.

 

Documentation Part 2

The school bulletin or other official publication which describes all curricula offered by the program.

A current copy of the New Mexico State University Graduate Catalog is enclosed.

The following MPH curriculum was unanimously approved by the Department of Health Science Graduate Curriculum Committee on January 12, 1999, and became effective on July 1, 1999. Current students have the option to adopt this new program of study if they graduate after July 1, 1999.

PUBLIC HEALTH CORE COURSES REQUIRED OF ALL MPH STUDENTS (18 CREDIT HOURS):

Course

Title

Credits

MPH 500

Orientation To Public Health

3

MPH 510

Community and Psychosocial Aspects of Public Health

3

MPH 520

Biostatistical Applications in Public Health

3

MPH 530

Epidemiological Approaches to Disease Control and Prevention

3

MPH 540

Public Health Service Design and Operation

3

MPH 550

Environmental Public Health Issues

3

COMMUNITY HEALTH EDUCATION CORE COURSES REQUIRED OF ALL MPH STUDENTS (15 CREDIT HOURS):

Course

Title

Credits

MPH 570

Foundations Of Public Health Education

3

MPH 572

Techniques in Health Communication/Education

3

MPH 573

Community Organization in Public Health

3

MPH 574

Health Program Planning, Evaluation and Research

3

MPH 579

Research and Resources In Community Health

3

CULTURAL HEALTH COURSE REQUIRED OF ALL MPH STUDENTS (3 CREDIT HOURS)

SELECT ONE FROM THE FOLLOWING LIST:

Course

Title

Credits

MPH 561

Health Communication With Hispanic Clients

3

MPH 562

Hispanic Health Issues

3

MPH 563

Interdisciplinary Seminar

3

MPH 564

Cross Cultural Aspects Of Health

3

MPH 565

International Health Problems

3

MPH 566

International Health Practicum

3

MPH 567

Rural Health Issues

3

MPH 568

Coping With Loss And Grief: A Cross-Cultural Perspective

3

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL MPH STUDENTS (4 CREDIT HOURS):

Course

Title

Credits

MPH 596

Field Experience

3

MPH 597

Graduate Public Health Seminar

1

 

CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR GRADUATE ADVISOR (4-9 CREDIT HOURS):

  1. THESIS OPTION (4-6 CREDIT HOURS):
  2. Course

    Title

    Credits

    MPH 599

    Master's Thesis

    4-6

  3. NON-THESIS OPTION (9 CREDIT HOURS OF ELECTIVE COURSES, WHICH MAY INCLUDE OTHER MPH COURSES OR 500-LEVEL COURSES FROM OTHER DEPARTMENTS):

Course

Title

Credits

 

Elective

3

 

Elective

3

 

Elective

3

The thesis option requires a total of 44-46 credit hours, while the non-thesis option requires 49 credit hours. Final examination for the non-thesis option will include both oral and written questions pertaining to the student's graduate coursework, prepared by the student’s graduate committee. Final examination for the thesis option will consist of an oral defense of the thesis and related coursework.

The Department of Health Science has the following admission requirements to the MPH program:

  1. Have completed a minimum of 6 semester credits in social and behavioral sciences, 3 semester credits in statistical methods, 4 semester credits in biology or related field, and 3 semester credits in either a foundations of health course or an epidemiology course.
  2. Scores from a recent examination of the Miller Analogies Test, GRE, GMAT, MCAT, or similar graduate level examination.
  3. Completion of biographical sketch and essay describing the applicant’s reason for desiring to pursue the MPH degree.
  4. Submission of at least three letters of reference from former faculty and/or employers.

Documentation Part 3

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

This criterion is met. The Department of Health Science offers an instructional program reflecting its stated mission and goals, leading to the MPH in community health education.

Criterion V. B.

Each professional degree program identified in V. A., as a minimum, shall assure that each student (a) develops an understanding of the areas of knowledge which are basic to public health, (b) acquires skills and experience in the application of basic community health education concepts and knowledge to the solution of community health problems, and (c) demonstrates integration of knowledge through a culminating experience.

Basic community health education concepts and knowledge include the following:

  1. Community health analysis – with special reference to community description, analysis of communication pathways, influence and power, social norms, coordinating provision of health education services, and roles of institutions in relation to learning and the behavioral change process;
  2. Health-related behavior – including knowledge of psychosocial, cultural and situational factors in the voluntary behavior change process;
  3. Educational processes – with particular relevance to adult learning, theories of health education including knowledge and skill in the use of group dynamics, leadership skills, mass media, community organization, training, consultation, communication, information retrieval systems, and planning as educational methods aimed at helping people to make voluntary, informed choices;
  4. Educational program planning, implementation and evaluation – including the use of community and behavioral analysis as a basis for establishing educational objectives, determining appropriate methods for educational intervention, carrying out planned educational programs and evaluating behavioral change outcomes, changes in community services and programs and community health status;
  5. Research – in terms of introduction to research design and methods applicable to community health education and voluntary behavior change; and
  6. Administration – with emphasis on organization theory, administrative management, supervisory and legislative processes, and conflict resolution.

Documentation Part 1

Identification of the means by which the program assures that all professional degree students have a broad understanding of the areas of knowledge basic to public health.

For the response to "Documentation Part 1" please refer to "Documentation Part 2" below.

Documentation Part 2

Identification of the means by which the program assures that all professional degree students acquire concepts, knowledge and skills basic to community health education.

A broad understanding of community health and the acquisition of health education concepts and skills will be accomplished primarily by means of the coursework in the MPH program of study. A brief description of the public health core courses required of all MPH students (total 18 credits) follows:

Orientation to Public Health MPH 500 (3 credits). Introduction to the historical and contemporary perspective of public health theory and practice. Involves investigation of public health as a discipline and programmatic means of health behavior change.

Community and Psychosocial Aspects of Public Health MPH 510 (3 credits). Covers the behavioral and educational aspects of disease prevention and health promotion from the individual and societal perspectives.

Biostatistical Applications in Public Health MPH 520 (3 credits). Quantitative statistics covering descriptive and inferential analysis in the public health context. Emphasis on hypothesis testing, analysis of variance, simple and multiple regression, and contingency table analysis for categorical data sets.

Epidemiological Approaches to Disease Control and Prevention MPH 530 (3 credits). Basic epidemiological principles applicable to infectious and noninfectious diseases. Descriptive techniques and analytic designs, application of statistical and epidemiological investigation methods included.

Public Health Service Design and Operation MPH 540 (3 credits). Covers the components, operations, and financing of public service delivery systems, with emphasis on organizational theory and managerial (administrative and supervisory) functions.

Environmental Public Health Issues MPH 550 (3 credits). Covers current topics and issues relating to environmental determinants of health (water resources, air quality, environmental pathogens) with emphasis on practical interventions by regulatory and best available technology and societal changes.

Basic community health education concepts and knowledge are covered by community health education courses required of all MPH students totaling 15 semester credit hours. These courses constitutes program specialization content and application of public health understanding and approaches.

Foundations of Public Health MPH 570 (3 credits). Social, behavioral, and educational methods of disease prevention and health promotion. Advances the historical and theoretical basis for evidence-based public health education.

Techniques of Health Communication and Education MPH 572 (3 credits). Application of a wide range of communication and education theories and methods used in public health.

Community Organization in Public Health MPH 573 (3 credits). Strategies for identifying and involving community leaders, community needs assessment, small area analysis and planning, and community-level development strategies.

Health Program Planning, Evaluation and Research MPH 574 (3 credits). Covers the process of successful public health education program planning and evaluation, research methods, and grant writing basics.

Research and Resources in Community Health MPH 579 (3 credits). Provides thorough understanding of public health research methodology and resources, strengths and weakness of research designs, and integration of statistical applications into research outcome assessment.

Documentation Part 3

Description of the program’s policies and procedures regarding practice placements, including criteria for selection of sites, methods for approving preceptors, approaches for faculty supervision and methods of assessment of students.

Part of the MPH student's culminating learning experience is a minimum 160-clock-hour field placement with a health agency of student choice (in consultation with the faculty supervisor). This provides students the opportunity to work directly with health officials in a community setting and integrate and apply the various concepts related to becoming an effective health educator and community leader.

The objectives of the field experience, as stated in the Department of Health Science Field Experience Handbook, are as follows:

  1. The student will be able to define the role of the health educator in one of the following settings; institutional, health agency, private agency, school, work-site, or gerontological setting.
  2. The student will be able to demonstrate specific role functions of the health educator such as conducting a needs assessment, and designing, implementing, and evaluating an identified agency project.

REQUIREMENTS AND SELECTION CRITERIA FOR FIELD PLACEMENT

The field experience is generally completed during the end of the second year of full-time matriculation, or after the student has completed the majority of course work. The student is encouraged to identify an appropriate community agency for field placement, however the final determination of appropriateness of the site placement rests with the departmental faculty supervisor. The agency should allow or encourage an environment which provides the student with the opportunity to develop and demonstrate a range of practice skills including:

THE AGENCY’S ROLE

The agency supervisor’s role is to help students develop and enhance their professional role and skills. Progressive increases in tasks and student involvement should occur as the student’s proficiency and knowledge of the agency increases. Tasks for the student should parallel CHES competencies and involve: data collection, writing informational brochures, program planning, development, implementation assistance, evaluation of conferences or programs, and direct contact with community clients/patients. The student is also required to be able to implement a unique project or contribute substantially to an existing to health education program. The agency must have the capability to support this requirement. The agency supervisor must have a background/experience in health education or be supervised by someone with that level/emphasis of training or education.

FACULTY SUPERVISOR’S ROLE

The faculty supervisor shall be responsible for the following activities:

FIELD PLACEMENT - STUDENT ROLE AND EXPECTATIONS

The goals and objectives of the field placement experience are formulated in concert with the student, faculty supervisor, and agency supervisor. However, they must adhere to the ten CHES competency areas as outlined in the field placement grading criterion. Specific student expectations of the field placement experience are as follows:

 

  1. Field Experience Contract: This agreement is to specify the goals and objectives of the placement, and is to be completed prior to beginning the position.
  2. Summary of Daily Activities: The student will keep a log detailing their daily activities including meetings attended, people met, tasks accomplished, and the number of hours worked that day.
  3. Regular Meetings: The student should schedule regular meetings with the agency supervisor and the faculty supervisor.
  4. Agency Report: The student will prepare a report on the agency they are placed at describing its background, history, funding, programs budgeted, programmatic objectives, agency mission, and accomplishments. Agency generated reports and literature are to be included in the report.
  5. Agency Evaluation by Student: The student is to complete a thorough agency evaluation and provide a short critique of the field experience. Students include suggestions as to how their placement may be improved in the future.
  6. Agency Field Experience Evaluation: The agency supervisor will complete an evaluation of the student using a specific format (provided in the department’s field experience handbook).
  7. Unique Agency Project: The student is to complete a unique or new contribution to the field placement agency or to an existing agency program. This contribution is to have prior approval by the faculty supervisor and the agency supervisor. The project contribution is to be left with the agency, and submitted to the faculty supervisor prior to completion of the field placement.
  8. Departmental Presentation: Each student, upon completion of their field placement, will give a presentation on his/her field experience that is open to all students, faculty, agency supervisors and the public.

Documentation Part 4

Identification of agencies and preceptors used for formal practice placement experiences for students, over the last three years.

Table V-1 (next page) indicates the agency and supervisor for each of the MPH students from years 1996 to 1999 that have completed the field placement.

Documentation Part 5

Identification of the culminating experience required for each degree program.

The Department of Health Science MPH program provides several culminating experiences for students:

  1. For those student who pursue the thesis option (MPH 599, 4 to 6 credits), the thesis allows for the student to take on a scholarly research effort with either primary or secondary data. The thesis can take the form of a policy analysis, a program evaluation, a health change intervention, or an investigation of a particular health problem. The thesis allows for a demonstration of the student's level of acquired analytical skills, methodological knowledge, and specialization in a field of professional interest. Upon completion of the thesis, the student’s faculty committee conducts the student in a public oral defense of the work, along with an oral examination.
  2. In addition, all MPH students are required to take the Graduate Public Health Seminar (MPH 597) for one credit near the end of their studies. This seminar provides a final effort and culminating experience for the student to integrate their knowledge and understanding of the profession of health education.
  3. The Department of Health Science also offers once per year a CHES preparation seminar. Graduating students are encouraged to take the seminar and sit for the CHES examination.

Finally, all students are required to complete MPH 596 "Field Experience" for 3 credit hours and 160 clock hours. The specifics of this required field experience are described in detail in Criterion V.B., Documentation Part 3.

Table V-1: Agency and supervisor for each of the MPH students from years 1996 to Summer, 1999 that have completed the field experience.

SEMESTER/YEAR

AGENCY

SUPERVISOR

Fall 1997

Pan American Health Organization, El Paso Field Office

Mary Bane

Fall 1997

Border Health Office, Las Cruces, NM

Kitty Richards

Fall 1997

New Mexico Department of Health District III, Las Cruces, NM

Patrize Jaramillo

Spring 1998

New Mexico Department of Health District III, Las Cruces, NM

Dana Schutz Miller

Spring 1998

Ben Archer Health Center, Truth or Consequences, NM

 

Spring 1998

Border Health Office, Las Cruces, NM

Luis Escobedo, M.D.

Summer 1998

Mesilla Valley Hospice, Las Cruces, NM

Terri Read

Fall 1998

Families and Youth, Inc., Las Cruces, NM

Kurt Becker

Fall 1998

New Mexico Department of Health District III, Las Cruces, NM

Joan Baumbach, M.D.

Fall 1998

Coulston Foundation, Alamogordo, NM

Mary Fannin

Spring 1999

Thomason Hospital, El Paso, TX

Mary Ann Friesen, R.N.

Spring 1999

William Beamont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX

Mike Grunwald

Summer 1999

United States Veteran Affairs Hospital, Roseburg, WA

Donald Casebolt

Summer, 1999

Office of Health Policy, Division of Public Health Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C.

Christy Schmidt

Documentation Part 6

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

This criterion is currently being met. The MPH program requires that each student (a) develops knowledge of the areas which are basic to health, (b) acquires skills and experience in the application of basic health education concepts, (c) acquires knowledge of the solutions and practice of community health problems, and (c) demonstrates integration of knowledge through a variety of culminating experiences.

Criterion V. C.

For each program identified in Criterion V. A., there shall be clear learning objectives.

Documentation Part 1

Identification of a set of learning objectives for each program of study identified in the matrix for V. A. If individualized learning objectives are used, identification of a sample set that is typical of each program of study and which can be verified through on-site inspection.

Following are the goals, major objectives, and measures for the MPH in Community Health Education program at NMSU. Each of the 41 measures are listed under their respective goals and objectives.

  1. GOAL: To prepare community health educators who have knowledge of community health and public health, health promotion and disease prevention
  1. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will demonstrate knowledge of the basic foundations of public health in the areas of biostatistics, epidemiology, health administration, and environmental health, as well as in the psycho-social aspects of health, and how each area contributes to the health education program planning and/or evaluation process.

Measures: As a graduate of the NMSU MPH program in Community Health Education, the student will be able to:

    1. Describe the philosophical and historical context of public health as it pertains to its present and future status. (Goal I, Obj A)
    2. Demonstrate knowledge of the core areas of education in public health-- biostatistics, epidemiology, health administration, and environmental health, as well as the psycho-social aspects of health. (Goal I, Obj A)
    3. Demonstrate an appreciation of the structure and function of the public health system in the United States, tenets of epidemiologic practice, health status assessment approaches, core activities of health promotion and disease prevention programs, and special topics around maternal and child health, injury prevention, environmental health, health and safety of workers, health of special populations, substance abuse, and health services delivery system issues. (MPH 500)
    4. Define psychosocial aspects of individual and community public health; discuss the factors that enhance and those that detrimentally affect psychosocial aspects of public health; understand the individual, familial, cultural, community and environmental factors that affect psychosocial health; and recognize the need for strategies and interventions to reduce the risk of disease and to improve health promotion efforts. (MPH 510)
    5. Distinguish public health research from evaluation activities; identify and write appropriate research questions and develop hypotheses; identify and properly apply appropriate statistical methods for answering research questions; and translate and infer research results into terms easily understood by others. (MPH 520)
    6. Understand aspects related to the investigation of acute and long-term health problems by type of study; including surveillance data, investigation of outbreaks, and analytical/chronic disease studies. (MPH 530)
    7. Relate a summary of the philosophy, purpose and history of public health; list the determinants of health; demonstrate an understanding of the basis for public health prevention and for specific organization and functions; list the methods of management of public health programs and the methods utilized in planning, marketing and assessing them; relate an understanding of management tools in the prevention of disease, disability and dependency and in health promotion; and demonstrate the continual assessment of U.S. public health utilizing the Institute' of Medicine's report The Future of Public Health. (MPH 540)
    8. Describe, distinguish and apply the scientific tools used to understand environmental health problems and their causes; demonstrate knowledge of the causes and effects of many of the current environmental problems that affect human health and well being; identify, describe, and discuss the role of governmental agencies in setting standards and making laws, and public policies affecting environmental health; recognize and evaluate ways in which individuals protect themselves from environmental contaminants, affect environmental problems and influence environmental policy; describe and evaluate opposing perspectives on environmental health issues and the scientific and cultural basis for those perspectives; and understand how environmental health issues are shaped by the complex interrelationships among people, political structures, and other dimensions of society (including natural and social sciences, business, and legal aspects). (MPH 550)
  1. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will demonstrate knowledge of the field of public health and the professional role of community health educators.

Measures: As a graduate of the NMSU MPH program in Community Health Education, the student will be able to:

    1. Describe the philosophical and historical context of community health education as it pertains to its present and future status and interpret concepts, purposes, and theories of health education (Goal I, Obj B)
    2. Demonstrate knowledge as to how each of the core areas of public health contributes to the health education program planning and/or evaluation process (Goal I, Obj B)
  1. GOAL: To prepare community health educators for health education responsibilities in program planning, development, implementation, and evaluation.
  1. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will apply community needs assessment information (both primary and secondary data) in planning appropriate health education interventions.

Measures: As a graduate of the NMSU MPH program in Community Health Education, the student will be able to:

    1. Identify how to obtain and use types and sources of health-related data including information on social and cultural environments, growth, and development factors, needs and interests (Goal II, Obj A)
    2. Assess the nature and extent of health problems and identify the behavioral components of the problems; distinguish between behaviors that foster and those that hinder well-being; and determine health priority areas related to the need for health education (Goal II, Obj A)
    3. Analyze social, cultural, economic and political factors that influence health and determine factors that influence learning and development (Goal II, Obj A)
    4. Utilize computerized health information retrieval systems effectively (Goal II, Obj A)
    5. Demonstrate the ability to utilize a variety of survey and statistical analyses techniques to conduct need assessments at the individual, group, and community levels (Goal II, Obj A)
    6. Plan and develop a health education program in response to identified and/or designated needs (Goal II, Obj A)
  1. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will demonstrate knowledge of various models of behavior change, including community organization and empowerment strategies, in planning health education programs to promote community health.

Measures: As a graduate of the NMSU MPH program in Community Health Education, the student will be able to:

    1. Demonstrate knowledge of the basic theories of health behavior and their potential uses in health education interventions (Goal II, Obj B)
    2. Formulate appropriate and measurable program objectives and design educational programs consistent with specified program objectives (Goal II, Obj B)
    3. Identify the educational strategies appropriate for achieving objectives and develop a logical scope and sequence plan for a health education program and demonstrate the use of social marketing principles in designing a health education program (Goal II, Obj B)
    4. Recruit community organizations, resource people, and potential participants for support and assistance in program planning (Goal II, Obj B)
  1. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will design and conduct program evaluation and research studies, to apply quantitative and qualitative methods, and computer-based data-processing skills.

Measures: As a graduate of the NMSU MPH program in Community Health Education, the student will be able to:

    1. Monitor educational programs, adjust objectives and activities as necessary (Goal II, Obj C)
    2. Develop plans to assess achievement of program objectives (Goal II, Obj C)
    3. Apply quantitative and qualitative methods and computer-based data processing and analyses skills (Goal II, Obj C)
    4. Apply findings to refine and maintain programs and in policy analysis and development (Goal II, Obj C)
  1. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will complete a community agency-based field experience that will include planning, implementing, and evaluating intervention programs.

Measures: As a graduate of the NMSU MPH program in Community Health Education, the student will be able to:

    1. Demonstrate competency in planning and in carrying out planned educational programs (Goal II, Obj D)
    2. Develop measurable objectives as needed for instruction; select methods and media best suited to implement program plans for specific learning (Goal II, Obj D)
    3. Select a variety of communication methods and techniques in providing health information (Goal II, Obj D)
    4. Carry out evaluation plans and interpret results of program evaluation; and infer implications from findings for future program planning (Goal II, Obj D)
  1. GOAL: To prepare community health educators to plan and deliver health education programs that reflect cultural sensitivity and which best address health needs among populations living along the US-Mexico border.
  1. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will apply knowledge related to the important role cultural beliefs and practices play in a population’s health practices in developing culturally appropriate, relevant, and sensitive health education programs.

Measures: As a graduate of the NMSU MPH program in Community Health Education, the student will be able to:

    1. Analyze social and cultural factors that influence health and incorporate demographically and culturally sensitive techniques to promote programs (Goal III, Obj A)
    2. Apply social marketing techniques to achieve program goals (Goal III, Obj A)
    3. Apply community empowerment and community organization skills to obtain community and leadership support for planning and development, implementation of health education programs that are appropriate and relevant to the needs of local communities (Goal III, Obj A)
  1. GOAL: To prepare community health educators to apply appropriate research principles and methods in health education; administer health education programs, and advance the profession of health education.
  1. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will conduct thorough reviews of literature, use appropriate qualitative and quantitative research methods, and apply research to health education practice.

Measures: As a graduate of the NMSU MPH program in Community Health Education, the student will be able to:

    1. Use electronic technology in retrieving references, select references pertinent to health education, critique sources of health information, evaluate research design, methodology and findings from the literature and synthesize key information from the literature (Goal IV, Obj A)
    2. Assess the merits and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods and apply both methods in research designs (Goal IV, Obj A)
    3. Use research information for program planning, in selecting implementation strategies, and in program evaluation (Goal IV, Obj A)
    4. Describe how research results can relate to health policy development and how to disseminate research findings (Goal IV, Obj A)
  1. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will obtain acceptance and support for health education programs, develop and manage fiscal and human resources, and exercise organizational leadership skills in administering health education programs.

Measures: As a graduate of the NMSU MPH program in Community Health Education, the student will be able to:

    1. Apply concepts and theories of public relations, communications, and social marketing theory to obtain program support (Goal IV, Obj B)
    2. Prepare proposals to obtain fiscal resources through grants, contracts and other sources, develop and be able to manage realistic budgets to support programs (Goal IV, Obj B)
    3. Develop qualifications statement (job descriptions), and identify how to: recruit, employ and evaluate staff members; provide staff development; and apply human resource policies consistent with relevant laws and regulations (Goal IV, Obj B)
  1. OBJECTIVE: Community health educators will critically analyze current and future needs in health education, develop an awareness of the various associations within the profession, create a plan for personal growth in the profession, subscribe to and be able to relate the importance of a code of ethics to professional practice.

Measures: As a graduate of the NMSU MPH program in Community Health Education, the student will be able to:

    1. Relate health education issues to larger social issues and articulate health education’s role in policy formation at various organizational and community levels (Goal IV, Obj C)
    2. Analyze the role of health education professional associations in advancing the profession, participate in such associations, and develop a personal plan for professional growth (Goal IV, Obj C)
    3. Analyze interrelationships among ethics, values, and behavior and relate the importance of the AAHE and SOPHE professional codes of ethics to professional practice (Goal IV, Obj C)
  1. GOAL: To engage graduate students and faculty in the department in community based activities through education research and service.
  1. OBJECTIVE: To incorporate community based activities in the program curriculum.

Measures:

  1. OBJECTIVE: Establish collaboration between students and faculty and community agencies as consultants and in scholarly and evaluative research.

Measures:

C. OBJECTIVE: Establish collaboration between students and faculty and community agencies in community service activities.

Measures:

  1. GOAL: To provide expertise in the resolution of international, national, state, and local issues related to the provision of health promotion and illness prevention services, especially among under-served populations.
  1. OBJECTIVE: To actively engage students and faculty in research in the area of provision of health promotion and illness prevention services among under-served populations.

Measures:

  1. OBJECTIVE: Engage students and faculty, in collaboration with community groups, in the analysis of policies related to the provision of health promotion and illness prevention services in under-served populations.

Measures:

The numbered measures above are listed in the follow course matrix to depict which courses are responsible for addressing each measure.

Analysis of courses that meet the above numbered measures in Criterion V. C. Documentation Part 1: (1=Minimal coverage; 2=Major coverage)

 

#

500

510

520

530

540

550

560+

570

572

573

574

579

596

597

599

Measure

1

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measure

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measure

3

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measure

4

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measure

5

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measure

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measure

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measure

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measure

9

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

Measure

10

1

1

1

1

1

1

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measure

11

1

2

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

2

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

1

 

Measure

12

1

2

1

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

1

1

1

 

 

2

1

 

Measure

13

1

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

1

 

Measure

14

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

2

 

Measure

15

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

1

1

2

2

2

 

 

Measure

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measure

17

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

2

2

 

 

 

 

2

1

 

 

(Continued) Analysis of courses that meet the above numbered measures in Criterion V. C. Documentation Part 1: (1=Minimal coverage; 2=Major coverage)

 

#

500

510

520

530

540

550

560+

570

572

573

574

579

596

597

599

Measure

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

2

1

2

1

2

 

 

Measure

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

2

2

1

 

 

2

 

 

Measure

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

1

2

1

 

 

1

 

 

Measure

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

1

 

 

2

 

 

2

 

 

Measure

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

1

 

2

 

 

2

 

 

Measure

23

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

1

 

 

2

2

2

 

 

Measure

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

2

2

1

 

 

Measure

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

1

 

 

2

 

 

Measure

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

1

 

 

2

 

 

Measure

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

Measure

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

2

2

2

 

 

Measure

29

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

1

1

2

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

Measure

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

2

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measure

31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

1

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measure

32

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

2

1

1

1

1

 

 

Measure

33

 

 

 

 

2

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

2

2

 

 

 

 

Measure

34

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

2

2

2

1

 

 

 

(Continued) Analysis of courses that meet the above numbered measures in Criterion V. C. Documentation Part 1: (1=Minimal coverage; 2=Major coverage)

 

#

500

510

520

530

540

550

560+

570

572

573

574

579

596

597

599

Measure

35

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

1

1

 

Measure

36

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

2

2

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

Measure

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

2

2

1

 

 

Measure

38

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

Measure

39

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

1

 

Measure

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

Measure

41

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

Documentation Part 2

A description of the manner in which learning objectives are developed, used and made available to students.

The learning objectives listed under Criterion V. C., Documentation Part 1, relate the preparation of students in both the basics of public health and in the community health education specialization. Those MPH faculty at NMSU who specialize in the core foundations of public health (biostatistics, epidemiology, health policy and administration, environmental health, and socio-behavioral foundations) used the Public Health in America, the Public Health Workforce: An Agenda for the 21st Century document as a guiding tool in the construction of their learning objectives. While it is recognized that this document refers to the types of expertise that should be available within a state department of health, public health division and not to specific responsibilities or competencies that all graduates of MPH programs should have, it nonetheless served this group of faculty as a basis upon which their learning objectives should be developed.

Each course syllabus incorporates those learning objectives relevant to the topic being covered by each course. These are categorized as objectives receiving "primary" emphasis and those receiving "secondary" emphasis for each syllabus. Individual lectures and class sessions are linked to these objectives and each individual faculty member is responsible for creating and conducting an outcomes assessment technique for each objective to monitor how well the course is meeting its intended objectives.

The program mission, goals and objectives are listed on the department’s web page, available to all students.

Documentation Part 3

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

This criterion is judged to be met. The Department of Health Science offers one graduate program, the MPH, with focus on community health education. Students are carefully advised as they go through the program to ensure the acquisition of concepts, knowledge and related experience in an orderly and progressive manner. Sequential learning is facilitated by the designation of some courses as prerequisites to more advanced courses. All courses have specific learning objectives that are declared in course syllabi; collectively these emerge in support of the program learning objectives. The courses offered reflect the mission and goals of the MPH degree and prepare students to be leaders in the profession of community health education. Course changes, modifications, and additions are an ongoing process that reflects refinements in criteria and the challenge of meeting changes in technology and in health needs.

Criterion V. D.

There shall be procedures for assessing and documenting the extent to which each student has attained these specified learning objectives and determining readiness for a public health education career.

Documentation Part 1

Description of the procedures used for monitoring and evaluating student progress in meeting stated learning objectives.

Procedures for Evaluating Student Progress

Form of Evaluation

Examples of MPH Courses

Faculty Member Seeks to Evaluate Each Student's Accomplishment of the Following

Written Examination

 

500, 510, 520, 530, 540, 550, 573, 574, 589

Ability to express themselves in written form, regarding concepts, theory, application of knowledge, understanding of topic.

Oral Presentations

 

500, 510, 540, 550, 573, 572, 570, 574, 589

Ability to present a coherent presentation of a health topic/issue.

Research Papers

500, 510, 540, 550, 572, 573, 579, 574, 550, 589

Ability to write a research paper; skills involved are library research, writing skills, literature review, synthesis of material.

Class Participation

500, 510, 540, 550, 572, 573, 570, 579, 574, 589

Able to express themselves, preparedness for class discussions, interact in group process successfully.

Program Projects

 

500, 574, 572

Able to plan a substantial health related intervention, evaluation, or undertakes a thorough topic essay.

Community involvement and service projects

 

500, 510, 540, 572, 573

Able to identify need in community; plan and implement intervention. Able to facilitate community organizational efforts initiated by communities. Able to design communication projects to include the media.

Field Experience

Project

 

596

Able to apply knowledge gained to participate in a health related program, and initiate their own program component.

Thesis

599

Able to fully integrate knowledge learned in the program, and produce a substantial contribution to the body of research literature.

Discussion and Debate

 

500, 550, 570, 520, 530

Participate in considerable in-class debate of community health theory and practice.

 

Analytical Skills

500, 570, 579, 572, 573

Produce substantive, critical literature review papers, understand structure of valid research methodology.

Documentation Part 2

Identification of outcomes which serve as measures by which the program will evaluate student achievement, and presentation of data assessing the program’s performance against those measures over the last three years.

Assessing the level of student attainment of the MPH program learning objectives is achieved by: (a) process evaluation (the ongoing evaluation by means of examinations and written research papers during and at the end of each course of study), and (b) outcome evaluation (the culminating assessments of the field placement experience, thesis defense, and non-thesis comprehensive examination). Success at each of these successive steps establishes the student's overall preparedness to undertake the role and activities of the graduate level health education professional.

Documentation Part 3

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

This criteria is judged to be met. Evaluations serve to assess and document the extent to which each student has attained specified course learning objectives. They also serve to determine student readiness for a career in health education.

Criterion V. E.

If the program also offers curricula for academic degrees, then students pursuing them shall have the opportunity and be encouraged to acquire an understanding of public health problems and a generic public health education. These curricula shall cover as much basic public health knowledge as is essential for meeting their stated learning objectives.

This professional program does not offer curricula for academic degrees.

Criterion V. F.

If the program offers joint degree programs, the required curriculum for the professional public health degree shall be equivalent to that required for a separate public health degree.

This program does not offer joint degree programs.

Criterion V. G.

If the program offers degree programs using non-traditional formats or methods, these programs must a) be consistent with the mission of the program and within the program’s established area of expertise; b) be guided by clearly articulated student learning outcomes which are rigorously evaluated; c) be subject to the same quality control processes that other degree programs in the program and university are, and d) provide planned and evaluated learning experiences which take into consideration and are responsive to the characteristics and needs of adult learners. If the program offers non-traditional programs, it must provide needed support for these programs, including administrative, travel, communication and student services. The program must have an ongoing program to evaluate the academic effectiveness of the format, to assess teaching and learning methodologies and to systematically use this information to stimulate program improvements.

The graduate degree program offered by the Department of Health Science utilizes traditional methods and format.

 

RESEARCH

Criterion VI.

The program shall pursue an active research program, consistent with its mission, through which its faculty and students contribute to the knowledge base of the community health education discipline, including research directed at improving the practice of public health.

Documentation Part 1

A description of the program’s research activities, including policies, procedures and practices which support research and scholarly activities.

The Department of Health Science's research goal statement, provided in Criterion I, follows the University's research philosophy:

Research is an important component of every academic activity, and is, therefore, the source of content for quality instructional programs. It is the policy of New Mexico State University to recognize research as essential to the vitality of the university and to recognize the support of research as part of its institutional responsibility. It is also the policy of New Mexico State University to promote academic inquiry and to protect academic freedom for those engaged in it.

New Mexico State University is a Carnegie Research I University; it is also an authorized minority institution under Title III of the Higher Education Act. It coordinates its research functions through several entities: the Council of Research Centers, the University Research Council, the Committee for Human Subjects in Research, and each College's Research Unit. The specific functions of each of these entities are outlined in the University's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual.

The purpose of the Health and Social Services Research Center is to provide assistance to the faculty of the College in the conduct of scientific research and professional training. The research center is administered under the Office of the Dean of the College of Health and Social Services, and includes a College of Health and Social Services Research Council composed of faculty representing the academic divisions within this college. Research mini-grants are funded, through recommendations from the research council, by the dean’s office. The research center provides information and support to faculty in the development of grant proposals. Faculty who present research at meetings are usually funded for most travel expenses by the department or by the college.

 

Documentation Part 2

A description of the current community based research activities and/or those undertaken in collaboration with health agencies and community based organizations. Formal research agreements with such agencies should be identified.

The bulk of the department's community based research activities are coordinated through the Southern Area Health Education Center (SoAHEC) which also includes the Border Health Education Training Center (BHETC), and a W.K. Kellogg grant for Graduate Medical and Nursing Education (GMNE) entitled "Community Partnerships in Graduate Medical and Nursing Education."

The mission of the Southern Area Health Education Center (SoAHEC)/Border Health Education Training Center (BHETC) is to improve health care in the southern eighteen counties of New Mexico. As a regional resource center SoAHEC/BHETC: a) provides learning opportunities for health care providers, b) assists in the development of placement sites for health professionals and students in training, c) links local educational and clinical resources with the educational resources of medical and health professional schools, and d) contributes funding, offers consultations, and assists in meeting educational and training needs of health care professionals, agencies, and organizations.

Housed in the newly renovated building on 1003 Geothermal Drive with the Southern Area Health Education Center, the Border Health Education Training Center (BHETC) actively works to recruit and retain providers to the rural and under-served areas along the U.S. - Mexico border area of New Mexico. BHETC supports travel and accommodations for medical residents and multidisciplinary teams of students interested in practicing in the area. Many of the family practice residents currently practicing in Doña Ana County have received BHETC assistance during their placement. Still other learners, such as the multidisciplinary teams of students from the University of New Mexico, receive funding to travel to various communities to explore and address community-identified health needs. BHETC also supports field trips for medical students to meet with practitioners along the border and to discuss practice considerations. It is anticipated that experience in this area of the state and familiarity with its unique needs and issues will encourage students from numerous health professions to consider practicing along the border upon graduation. BHETC also helps to develop and provide partial funding for continuing education opportunities for health professionals already practicing in rural and under-served areas of the state.

AHEC's 1999-2002 objectives are:

  1. Maintain and strengthen clinical training in New Mexico's Health Professional Shortage Areas for medical, nursing, public health, pharmacy, physician assistant, allied health, family practice, pediatrics, psychiatry, and strengthen and support interdisciplinary training in NM Health Professional Areas for dental hygiene, medical laboratory science, medicine, nursing, pharmacy physical therapy, occupational therapy, respiratory therapy, social work, speech therapy students and other health professionals.
  2. Continue AHEC's community-based health career awareness programs which promote health and increase the applicant pool from under-represented ethnic minorities and Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSA's) into the health professions.
  3. Expand, support, and conduct continuing education and training programs as appropriate, to promote the retention of health professionals in the AHEC counties in collaboration with the Continuing Medical Education Office at UNM and community organizations.
  4. Continue the AHEC strategic planning process for building regional primary care capacity.
  5. Strengthen and maintain the statewide AHEC system.

The Kellogg grant was received by the University of New Mexico Health Science Center (UNM HSC) and helped establish learning opportunities for graduate nursing and medical students in Santa Rosa, N.M. (120 miles east of Albuquerque), in the Southeast Heights of Albuquerque (high population of Vietnamese and Mexican immigrants), and in "the Southwest Quadrant" of NM, based at the SoAHEC at NMSU. Participation is expected from NMSU graduate nursing students (MSN students) and medical residents from UNM. In all cases, per the grant, the education is to be community-based and community-driven. In fall 1996, connections were established with Hidalgo County (Lordsburg) and with Chaparral, the rapidly growing colonia in Southern New Mexico (north of El Paso, TX). UNM HSC has directed modest support to NMSU for the work in this area since then. As the work has evolved significant graduate level learning opportunities have been established in both communities. Most participating NMSU graduate students are from social work, sociology, medical anthropology, the MPH program and nursing. On occasion students from business administration and agriculture among others as well as NMSU undergraduates who planned to go on to medical school have been involved. Involvement of medical residents to date has been minimal, although UNM did steer some medical school students our way in the 1st year and the UNM College of Nursing has sent family nurse practitioner students our way. This program has turned into a very effective learning experience in rural community settings for our participating students. It is 100% interdisciplinary and is serving populations that, quite frankly, used to think that NMSU was to be cursed for its lack of interest in serving the health concerns of populations outside of Las Cruces. Meetings with these communities are held at least twice weekly, all year around, and they now welcome and accept us as an entity helping them identify and close health and social service gaps in the community.

 

Documentation Part 3

A list of current research activity, including amount and source of funds, over the last three years.

MAJOR GRANTS AND CONTRACTS

FY 1999

FY 1998

FY 1997

 

 

 

 

STATE AHEC

 

 

 

FEDERAL AHEC

 

 

 

BORDER HETC

 

 

 

GMNE-KELLOGG

$

 

 

AHCOP

$182,279

$182,279

$182,279

BHO

$218,725

214,500

184,737

NIJ

$152,506

 

 

TOTAL OF MAJOR DEPARTMENT RESEARCH ACTIVITY

 

 

 

Additional grants and contracts include:

"Effects of Loud Sports Activity Exposures on Temporary Threshold Shifting of Subjects Hearing Range as a Potential Threat to Long-term Reduction in Hearing Acquity," funded by New Mexico State University Mini-grant (1999), $500. Principal Investigator: E. Meister.

"Who Teaches Patients in Managed Care?" funded by New Mexico State University Mini-grant (1996-1997), $1,200. Principal Investigators: Mondragón, Barnes

"Dairy Herds and Residential Communities in Southern New Mexico," funded by New Mexico Border Health Office, District III, Public Health Division (1997-1998), $12,500.

Principal Investigator: Arnold

"Community-Based Solutions to Illegal Dumping," submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1999-2000), $7,000. Principal Investigators: Simons, Arnold.

"Domestic Violence and Hospital Emergency Rooms in NM." (1997-98). $1500. S. Krishnan. NMSU research minigrant.

"Community and University Partnerships. Effectiveness and Relevance of These Partnerships." 1996-97. $750. S. Krishnan. NMSU research minigrant.

Documentation Part 4

Identification of measures by which the program may evaluate the success of its research activities, along with data regarding the program's performance against those measures over the last three years.

Faculty success in research and scholarly activities are evaluated both in terms of quantity and quality on an annual basis as part of their annual performance evaluation. These scholarly activities, in addition to adding to the content of a professors' teaching, are evaluated by presentation and publication.

Samples of faculty scholarly productivity over the past three (3) years:

Documentation Part 5

A description of student involvement in research.

Graduate students are involved in departmental research activities in a number of ways. On a formal level, faculty are assigned a paid graduate research assistant for 10-20 hours per week to assist with all aspects of research. The department currently has funds to support six (6) graduate research assistants at 10 hours per week (each).

Faculty also hire graduate research assistants to assist with various research activities on funded grants and contracts. For example, the Allied Health Careers Opportunity Program has employed 1-2 graduate research assistants for the past several years, the National Institute of Justice grant employs several part-time students for data collection, and the Border Health Office contract employs 3-4 graduate research assistants.

A number of students have also been involved with the Southern Area Health Education Center (SoAHEC) which also includes the Border Health Education Training Center (BHETC), and a W.K. Kellogg grant for Graduate Medical and Nursing Education (GMNE) entitled "Community Partnerships in Graduate Medical and Nursing Education."

Finally, graduate students are involved with various research activities as they relate to class projects and for thesis research.

Documentation Part 6

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

This criterion is met. The Department of Health Science pursues an active research program, consistent with its mission, through which students and faculty contribute to the knowledge base of health education, including research directed at improving the practice of health.

 

SERVICE

Criterion VII.

The program shall pursue an active service program, consistent with its mission, through which faculty and students contribute to the advancement of health education practice, including continuing education.

Documentation Part 1

Description of the program’s service activities, including policies, procedures and practices which support service. If the program has formal contracts or agreements with external agencies, these should be noted.

The MPH in Community Health Education degree program in the NMSU Department of Health Science provides numerous opportunities for students and faculty to engage in service to the community, the profession, and to Certified Health Education Specialists in the region by providing or co-sponsoring approved, Category I continuing education programs (as authorized through the National Commission on Health Education Credentialing). Much of the program’s community service is conducted by individual faculty (to be presented under item #2 in this section). The other major source of student and faculty engagement in community service efforts are through the various externally-funded programs associated with the NMSU Department of Health Science.

The longest efforts are the Southern Area Health Education Center (SoAHEC) and the Border Health Education Training Center. The SoAHEC was originally managed by The Institute for Gerontological Research and Education (TIGRE), but the Department of Health Science Head, then Dr. Jeffrey Brandon, assumed the leadership of this effort on October 1, 1990. On that same date the Border Health Education Training Center (BHETC) was also inaugurated at NMSU, again under the management of the Department of Health Science head. Both the SoAHEC and BHETC were initially entirely funded through flow-through monies from the DHHS Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) through the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center. Federal law for AHECs and HETCs required that 75% of the federal funds allocated to such centers flow out of the various states’ health sciences centers to local communities. Since 1988 the UNM subcontract to operate the SoAHEC has been through NMSU. A similar arrangement followed upon the inauguration of the Border HETC program. While the SoAHEC’s focus was on recruiting, educating, and retaining health care providers in southern New Mexico, especially in rural areas and largely through co-sponsorship of continuing education events and sponsorship of medical students from the UNM Health Science Center to southern New Mexico to serve rural rotations, the focus of the Border HETC was more on community initiatives. A compilation of SoAHEC and BHETC sponsored events over the past several years is available in the Site Review Team’s Resource File.

Perhaps the most significant outcome of this long-term collaboration between the state’s two major research universities is the agreement in 1990 to develop two complementary MPH degree programs in New Mexico. From this SoAHEC-sponsored beginning, it was determined that the UNM MPH program would specialize in Community and Preventive Medicine with concentrations to be developed in epidemiology and biostatistics. The NMSU MPH was to complement this stage one initiative by developing its own, unique MPH in Community Health Education, which would capitalize on its faculty strength in this area. While the UNM MPH was to be launched in 1994, the NMSU MPH program was to begin in 1995 or 1996. Faculty from both programs have continued to meet approximately annually to discuss collaboration efforts and to strategize about how to continue to meet the state’s personnel health needs.

Another SoAHEC coordinated initiative is the Kellogg Graduate Medical and Nursing Education proposal, funded in 1996 for four years through the University of New Mexico and the New Mexico Department of Health (DOH). The SoAHEC coordinates the GMNE program in the Southwest quadrant of New Mexico, which is linked organizationally with the other New Mexico GMNE sites, namely Santa Rosa and the Southeast Heights area of Albuquerque. One GMNE goal is to offer graduate students, including graduate students from health, social work, and related areas as well as nursing and medicine, early career exposure to rural communities. Interdisciplinary goals focus on working in a community-driven partnership, where students learn from each other about the contributions other disciplines make to improving health. Part of this effort includes support for community council development and working with DOH participants. Two communities that have the focus of this effort are Chaparral and Lordsburg. MPH students have assisted both communities in conducting health needs assessment surveys, and have assisted in community-wide health fairs at the Chaparral site and also in Hildalgo County.

Yet another state-wide initiative that the NMSU Department of Health Science has been involved in is the New Mexico Turning Point project. This project was submitted by the New Mexico Department of Health to the Kellogg Foundation in July, 1997 and was funded later that year. The overarching goal of this initiative is to assist the state and local health systems to more effectively collaborate with one another to strengthen the health infrastructure and to respond to major health challenges, both present and future. Representatives from both the UNM and NMSU MPH programs were included in the State Umbrella Partnership. Eight community partnership consortia were also included in the proposal, with most of these being approved to receive Kellogg support.

Two other initiatives are also noteworthy. The first was the Department of Health Science Head’s initiative to have the department support the New Mexico Border Health Office. In 1990, Dr. Brandon was one of the inaugural members of the Southern New Mexico Border Health Council, whose initiatives finally led to the New Mexico legislature funding the NM Border Health Office in July of 1992. The mission of this state office is to improve health status and health services in the New Mexico border region and other border-impact areas of the state. It works toward achieving this mission through developing: (1) systematic information, surveillance, research and data collection systems to monitor changes in health status, (2) health planning and assessment processes for the border area, (3) improved access to maternal and child health services, (4) training programs and assistance to health professionals and health workers, (5) mechanisms for cooperating with health officials of neighboring states and Mexico, (6) an environmental surveillance system, and (7) funding support for health projects. Its efforts have included support of the Nuestros Ninos Binational Immunization Campaign (which also involved SoAHEC and BHETC support), implementation of the Binational Border Health Information System, the Integrated Border Information and Surveillance System, and of the Environmental Health Data Clearinghouse. For the past several years the NM Border Health Office has employed about 24 NMSU undergraduate and graduate students, including students in the MPH program.

The other major initiative was the Department of Health Science Head’s authoring the years 01-03 and years 04-06 proposals to fund the department’s Allied Health Careers Opportunity Program (AHCOP). This was one of the few such proposals that was funded upon its first submission to the DHHS HRSA’s Bureau of Health Professions in 1993, thus demonstrating that it was addressing a high federal priority area along our shared border with Mexico. The purpose of the AHCOP is to increase the number of disadvantaged, minority students majoring in either the Bachelor of Community Health or in the Master of Public Health degree programs offered by the department. It does this through collaborating with the Dona Ana Branch Community College’s AHCOP (a related program in which the department collaborated in the proposal writing effort), and through its two six-week summer facilitating entry programs (one for the BCH and one for the MPH degree). MPH students were also hired by the AHCOP program to provide tutorial assistance and monitoring of program efforts. The year 04-06 proposal also required all student participants to engage in a community-based health service project.

Between October 1, 1990 and July, 1998, these and other externally-funded initiatives from the department produced the following direct costs: $1,388,021 for the federal portion and later $465,169 from state support for the SoAHEC; $533,594 for the Border HETC; $855,271 from the department’s support of the New Mexico Border Health Office (state funds through the New Mexico Department of Health’s Public Health Division budget from July 1, 1992 through the present); and $918,049 direct from HRSA to support the department’s AHCOP initiative (September, 1993 through September, 1999). Another $117,828 in US Department of Education Funds for the Improvement of Post-Secondary Education (FIPSE), with $96,852 in NMSU matching funds, was also awarded from September, 1991 through September 30, 1993 for a drug prevention effort. This FIPSE program (with co-PIs of Brandon and Wilson, the NMSU Counseling Center Director) was called the Campus Lifestyle Program and had a primary focus on NMSU students.

Again, examples of the involvement of individual students and faculty with community-based service efforts, and faculty involvement in efforts to support the profession of community health and health education specifically, will be referenced in the next item (#2) under this section.

The Department of Health Science has been an NCHEC-approved provider of Category I continuing education contact hours for CHES since 1992.

Documentation Part 2

A list of the program’s current service activities, including identification of the community groups and nature of the activity, over the last three years.

A partial and representative listing, by faculty member, of service to the community is listed below. Please note that in keeping with the primary objectives of the M.P.H. degree program, most of these activities involve projects related to the US-Mexico border communities, specifically those in southern New Mexico.

Arnold, S

Brandon, JE

Buckingham, R.

Krishnan, S.

Meister, E.

Mondragon, D.

Service to the respective professions represented by the faculty areas of specialization are listed below. These roles relate to the professions and to their impact on the larger national-level society.

Arnold, S.

Brandon, J

Krishnan, S

Mondragon, D

Documentation Part 3

A description of the program’s continuing education activities, including policies, procedures and practices which support continuing education.

Since 1992, the Department of Health Science has been approved by the National Commission on Health Education Credentialing, Inc. to be a Category I Multiple Event Provider of Continuing Education Contact Hours for Certified Health Education Specialists. Policies, procedures and practices (and current membership on the CHES Event Approval Committee) which support continuing education efforts are included in the Resource File.

Documentation Part 4

A list of the continuing education programs offered by the program, including number of students serviced, over the last three years.

To date, the MPH program has not offered continuing education events.

Documentation Part 5

A list of other institutions with which the program collaborates to offer continuing education, if any.

To date, the MPH program has not offered continuing education events in collaboration with other institutions.

Documentation Part 6

Identification of the measures by which the program may evaluate the success of its service program, along with data regarding the program’s performance against those measures over the last three years.

The MPH Outcomes Assessment Objectives provide the measures by which the MPH program at NMSU evaluates the success of its service program. This was first reported in the department’s Outcomes Assessment Report of February 26, 1999, which is available in the Resource File. These are also discussed within Section 8 of Part VII of this self-study report.

Documentation Part 7

A description of student involvement in service.

Students have been involved in faculty service to the community in various ways. This has occurred at the individual faculty level (see section 2 above under Dr. Krishnan where four MPH students are listed), especially through the required MPH 596 Field Experiences, all of which involve students working at least 160 clock hours at a health agency/organization.

The primary vehicle for encouraging student involvement has been through the various external agreements/subcontracts the Department of Health Science has had over the years. These include the contract with the NM Department of Health to support the Border Health Office, the Kellogg GMNE Initiative through the SoAHEC, and the AHCOP program. Examples of student involvement with each of these is presented below.

NM Department of Health-Border Health Office Support

The Department of Health Science begins its' 8th year of collaboration in support of the operations of the New Mexico Border Health Office, the only such office along the US border with Mexico that has offices located on a university campus. The contract with the NM Department of Health often supports in excess of 20 NMSU students who assist in the Office in various ways.

SoAHEC’s Kellogg GMNE Initiative

 

Allied Health Careers Opportunity Program (AHCOP)

Abrium Escarzaga, Joseph Roth, Joanne Bates, Teresa Ramirez, and Don Meyer worked for the AHCOP during the summer, 1998 and the first two students have worked longer with the program to help with numerous aspects of the program, including community-based projects. All students participating in the AHCOP at NMSU’s Department of Health Science in years 04-06 (beginning with the Summer Facilitating Entry to the MPH Program Track in 1997) are required to engage in community-service as part of their work with the AHCOP.

A listing of the community agencies where these students are currently working includes:

The Border HETC, 1997 and 1998

Comprehensive School Health, Inc., 1997

DOH, Public Health District III’s WIC program, 1997, 1998

DOH Health Promotion Office, 1997

Environmental Health Office, 1997

Family Medical Center’s Women’s Clinic, 1997

La Clinica de Familia: Adolescent Family Life Program, 1997

Sunland and Anthony Clinic Promotora Programs, 1997

Memorial Medical Center: First Step Women’s Clinic, 1998

Mesilla Valley Rehabilitation, 1997 and 1998

NovaCare, 1998

Southwest AIDS Resources, 1997

NMSU Student Health Center, 1997 and 1998

Thomason Hospital, 1997

Documentation Part 8

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

This criterion is judged to be met.

The land grant philosophy of New Mexico State University stresses the relationship between teaching, research, and the responsibility to extend service to the people of the state of New Mexico. The mission of NMSU is to serve the people of New Mexico through education, research, extension education, and public service, with special emphasis on preserving the states multi-cultural heritage, protecting its environment, and fostering its economic development in an interdependent world. The public service responsibility objective is dedication to public service. NMSU is committed to providing specialized assistance, information, and programs designed to meet educational, cultural, and economic needs of the state. Specific university goals for implementing this include: encouraging university students, faculty, administration, and staff to play leadership roles in identifying and solving the economic, social, and cultural problems of the people of New Mexico by providing rewards for such leadership and to develop service activities which emphasize the unique features of our border environment.

The current organization of the Department of Health Science and the MPH program at NMSU permits and encourages active involvement of students and faculty with community agencies and professional organizations. Indicators such as leadership positions in the various professional organizations sited, through consultative and external arrangements with community agencies and organizations, and through the various service presentations for community agencies are evidence that this criterion is being met.

The goals and objectives included in the MPH outcomes assessment plan encourages both faculty and MPH student participation in such community-based service events and research endeavors. This ensures that the essential connection between the academic activities of the department and the professional practice of community agencies is maintained.

 

FACULTY

Criterion VIII. A.

The program shall have a clearly defined faculty which, by virtue of its size, multidisciplinary nature, educational preparation, research and teaching competence, and practice experience, is able to fully support the program’s mission, goals and objectives.

Documentation Part 1

Identification (in table or chart) of faculty to support the degree programs offered by the program, indicating at least professional rank, tenure status, percent time devoted to the program, earned degrees, universities at which degrees were earned, disciplinary area of degree, area of teaching responsibility, area of research interest, and selected demographic data (gender, ethnicity).

Table VIII-1 is a Faculty Demographics table that shows the professional rank, tenure status, percent time devoted to the program, earned degrees and disciplinary areas, universities in which degrees were earned, teaching responsibilities, research interests, and the gender and ethnicity of the faculty of the Department of Health Science. This table shows the culturally and educationally diverse background of the faculty in the MPH program.

Documentation Part 2

Description of the manner in which the faculty complement integrates perspectives from the field of practice.

The diverse professional experience of the faculty covers a broad range of areas in the field of health. These include research and expertise in areas such as community health education, environmental health, epidemiology, biostatistics, health care management, women’s issues, ethics committees, clinical practice/hospital administration, and human sexuality. These areas help provide a foundation of experience for students in the health education field as they confront issues that have cultural, political, and socioeconomic implications.

Documentation Part 3

Identification of outcome measures by which the program may judge the qualifications of its faculty complement, along with data regarding the performance of the program against those measures over the last three or more years.

Outcome measures are determined by course objectives as well as student evaluations. Student evaluations are completed at the end of every semester. Evaluations conducted by the department head are also completed at the end of every semester. These evaluations are helpful in assuring that courses are providing health education students with the best possible faculty for the courses that are being taught.

TABLE VIII-1: Faculty Demographics

NAME

RANK

TENURE STATUS

PERCENT TIME DEVOTED TO MPH PROGRAM

EARNED DEGREES AND DISCIPLINARY AREAS

UNIVERSITIES IN WHICH DEGREES WERE EARNED

AREA OF TEACHING RESPONSIBILITY

RESEARCH INTERESTS

GENDER

ETHNICITY

Brandon, Jeffery

Professor and Associate College Dean

Tenured

12.5% Teaching

Ph.D. in Community Health Education

M.A. in Rehabilitation Administration and Services

B.A. in History, and minor in Physiology

Southern Illinois at Carbondale

Community Health Education

Issues in community health education, problem-based learning, US/Mexico border health

Male

Caucasian

Buckingham, Robert

Professor

Tenured

32.5 % Teaching

Doctor of Public Health

 

M.A. in

Social Anthropology

B.A. in Government

Yale University School of

Medicine

Wesleyan University

 

University of Arizona

Public Health, Epidemiology

Epidemiology, designing and implementing hospice programs, HIV/AIDS research, cancer research , and infectious diseases

Male

Caucasian

Arnold, Stephen

Associate Professor and Academic Department Head

Tenured

12.5% Teaching; 37.5% Administrative

Ph.D. in Environmental Health

B.S. in Biology, Chemistry minor

Colorado State University

New Mexico State University

Environmental and Occupational Health

Environmental and occupational health

Male

Caucasian

Mondragon, Delfi

Associate

Professor

Tenured

50% Teaching

Doctor of Public Health

Masters of Public Health

Masters of Health Services

 

B.S. in Nursing

University of California, Berkley

University of California, Davis

University of New Mexico

Health policy, administration and ethics

Managed care, patient care and ethics, gang violence, and diabetes

Female

Hispanic

 

NAME

RANK

TENURE STATUS

PERCENT TIME DEVOTED TO MPH PROGRAM

EARNED DEGREES AND DISCIPLINARY AREAS

UNIVERSITIES IN WHICH DEGREES WERE EARNED

AREA OF TEACHING RESPONSIBILITY

RESEARCH INTERESTS

GENDER

ETHNICITY

Krishnan, Satya

Assistant

Professor

Tenure line

62.5 % Teaching

Ph.D. in Health Education

 

MBA in Health Services Management

M.S. in Biochemistry; B.S. in Mathematics, Physics, and Chemistry

Texas Women's’ University

Golden Gate University

 

Nagpur University, Nagpur, India

Community Health Education

Health education, domestic violence, HIV/AIDS education, suicide, depression and substance abuse

Female

Asian Indian

Meister, Edward

Assistant

Professor

Tenure line

50% Teaching

Ph.D. of Public Health

Masters of Public Administration

M.A. in Environmental Arts and Science

B.S. in Biological Science; and certification in secondary education

Oregon State University

University of Wisconsin, at Oshkosh

University of Wisconsin at Green Bay

University of Wisconsin at Madison

Community Health Education

Community health, infectious disease epidemiology, disease prevention, environmental health, sustainable relationships, international health.

Male

Caucasian

Escobedo, Luis

Adjunct Assistant Professor

Non-tenure line

25% Teaching

M.D.

M.P.H.

B.A.

Stanford

Harvard

New Mexico State University

Epidemiology

Public Health

Epidemiology, US/Mexico border health, non-infectious disease

Male

Hispanic

Velarde, Lily

College Assistant Professor

Non-tenure line

25% Teaching

Ph.D. Health Education

University of New Mexico

Community Health Education

Community Health Education

Female

Hispanic

 

NAME

RANK

TENURE STATUS

PERCENT TIME DEVOTED TO MPH PROGRAM

EARNED DEGREES AND DISCIPLINARY AREAS

UNIVERSITIES IN WHICH DEGREES WERE EARNED

AREA OF TEACHING RESPONSIBILITY

RESEARCH INTERESTS

GENDER

ETHNICITY

Pitblado, Jeffery

College Assistant Professor

Non-tenure line

50% Teaching

Ph.D. (ABD)

M.S. in statistical Science

 

B.S. in Mathematical Sciences

Southern Methodist

University

Southern Methodist

University

University of Texas at El Paso

Biostatistics

Statistical methods, nonparametric methods, and resampling methods

Male

Hispanic

Vilchis, Hugo

College Assistant Professor

Non-tenure line

5% Teaching

MPH

MED

MD&S

PH/Mexico D.F.

MD/UNAM

MD/N Autonomous Uuniversity of Mecixo

US/Mexico border health

Epidemiology, US/Mexico border health

Male

Hispanic

Table VIII-2: Course evaluation scores for MPH courses offered since 1996. Five (5) is best; one (1) is worst.

MPH COURSE NUMBER

COURSE EVALUATION SCORE

SEMESTER AND YEAR

500

3.91

FA 1996

500

4.24

FA 1996

500

3.71

FA 1998

510

4.17

FA 1996

510

4.27

FA 1998

520

4.46

FA 1996

520

4.12

FA 1998

530

4.18

SP 1997

530

2.99

SP 1999

540

4.19

FA 1996

540

3.90

FA 1998

550

4.80

Sp 1996

550

4.83

SP 1999

553

4.34

SSII 1999

555

4.37

SP 1998

555

4.27

SP 1999

559

4.09

SP 1999

560

4.61

Sp 1996

560

4.37

SP 1998

562

4.00

SSII 1996

564

4.14

SP 1999

565

3.29

Sp 1996

565

4.56

SP 1998

565

4.21

SP 1999

566

4.81

SSI 1998

570

NS

SP 1998

571

3.79

SP 1999

572

3.86

SP 1997

572

3.91

SP 1998

572

4.33

SP 1999

573

2.56

FA 1998

576

4.52

FA 1996

578

4.32

SP 1998

578

4.21

SP 1999

579

4.76

SSI 1996

581

4.11

Sp 1996

582

4.75

Sp 1996

584

4.53

SP 1999

585

4.65

SP 1999

586

4.41

SSI 1997

589

4.88

FA 1996

589

4.16

SP 1999

590

5.00

FA 1996

591

4.06

SSI 1999

595

4.64

Sp 1996

Documentation Part 4

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

Administrative and student evaluations are an effective measure of the qualifications of the faculty. This also method provides the faculty with the feedback necessary to maintain and evaluate the effectiveness of the teaching and learning process.

Criterion VIII. B.

The program shall have well defined policies and procedures to recruit, appoint and promote qualified faculty, to evaluate competence and performance of faculty and to support the professional development and advancement of faculty.

Documentation Part 1

Inclusion of a faculty handbook or other written document which outlines faculty rules and regulations.

Specific written documentation which outlines faculty rules and regulations are described in the Faculty Handbook. This handbook serves as the basis for all policies and procedures necessary for assisting faculty with guidelines in which to best perform their teaching responsibilities within the university.

Documentation Part 2

Description of provisions for faculty development, including identification of support for faculty categories other than regular full-time appointments.

The Department of Health Science helps to cover conference travel, provide opportunities to work with non-tenured and tenured faculty on grants and research activities, and provide opportunities to teach part-time at NMSU while working full-time elsewhere. These provisions help to provide full-time faculty, and especially part-time faculty, with the opportunity to be involved with students in both teaching and working environments. Part-time faculty may develop professionally by bringing into the university environment working expertise in health education.

Documentation Part 3

Description of formal procedures for evaluating faculty competence and performance.

The department head and respective faculty member review course evaluations; subsequently, a one-on-one evaluation regarding the competence and performance of the faculty member is conducted. Additionally, an annual performance evaluation is performed by the Department of Health Science and the Promotion and Tenure Committee. The annual performance evaluation assures that an ongoing process of competency standards are being met and evaluated to provide faculty with guidelines to promotion and tenure.

 

Documentation Part 4

A description of student course evaluation process and/or evaluation of teaching

effectiveness.

Each student completes an 18-question course evaluation at the end of each semester to evaluate the course and the effectiveness of a particular professor. Another faculty member not associated with teaching the course being evaluated administers course evaluations. The 18-question course evaluation is graded and summarized while the 3-question open-ended written portion is typed. Both portions are given to the faculty member at the end of each semester after final grades have been turned in. Course evaluations are considered to be confidential and are shared only with the department head and the individual faculty member being evaluated. However, these course evaluations are included by the faculty member with their annual performance evaluation portfolio and with promotion/tenure portfolios.

Documentation Part 5

Description of the emphasis given to community service activities in the promotion and tenure process.

Community service activities are strongly encouraged within the Department of Health Science to help gain promotion or tenure, as well as being part of normal faculty assignments. Most faculty will spend approximately 20% of their time performing community service activities. These services help to assure that the faculty of the Department of Health Science is involved in activities within the community, contributing in their particular areas of expertise while benefiting the community as a whole.

Documentation Part 6

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

This criterion is met. The program has well defined policies and procedures to recruit, appoint and promote qualified faculty, to evaluate competence and performance of faculty and to support the professional development and advancement of faculty. A copy of the departmental and college tenure/promotion and annual performance guidelines will be provided to the site visit team.

Criterion VIII. C.

The program shall recruit, retain and promote a diverse faculty, and shall offer equitable opportunities to qualified individuals regardless of age, sex, race, disability, religion or national origin.

Documentation Part 1

Demographic data on the program’s faculty.

Table VIII-1 provides a summary of the diverse cultural and educational backgrounds of faculty, which contribute to and supports the multifaceted aspects of health education.

Documentation Part 2

Description of policies and procedures regarding the program’s commitment to providing equitable opportunities without regard to age, sex, race, disability, religion or national origin.

Please see the policies and procedures manual in the NMSU Administrative Policies and Procedure Manual (AP&P) available on-line. The AP&P outlines the procedures which apply to all programs at NMSU and the commitment to providing equal opportunities for employment regardless of age, sex, race, disability, religion, or national origin.

Documentation Part 3

Identification of outcome measures by which the program may evaluate its success in achieving a demographically diverse faculty complement, along with data regarding the performance of the program against those measures over the last three or more years.

The NMSU Personnel and EEO offices complete evaluations of demographically diverse faculty. This assures that the Department of Health Science is providing, on an ongoing basis, every opportunity for qualified individuals to work at the department.

Documentation Part 4

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

This criterion is judged to be met. The program has a clearly defined faculty which, by virtue of its size, multidisciplinary nature, educational preparation, research and teaching competence, and practice experience is able to fully support the program’s mission, goals and objectives.

 

STUDENTS

Criterion IX. A.

The program shall have student recruitment and admissions policies and procedures designed to locate and select qualified individuals capable of taking advantage of the program’s various learning activities which will enable each of them to develop competence for a career in health education.

Documentation Part 1

Description of the program’s recruitment policies and procedures, with examples of recruitment materials.

The Department of Health Science uses both formal and informal networks and outreach efforts to recruit prospective students. A personal letter along with program information including a brochure about the program and the application process, departmental and graduate school application, information about courses, and the fact sheet about the program and students are mailed to all those who request information and/or express interest. Prospective students contact the department through letters, e-mail, phone, meetings with faculty, and as walk-ins. The department also maintains a World Wide Web page that provides information about the undergraduate and graduate programs offered, as does the NMSU Graduate School with a direct link to the Department of Health Science web page. This communication channel has been particularly useful for recruiting prospective international students. The departmental web pages are regularly updated to reflect the evolution and expansion of the graduate program.

The Department of Health Science has a well-established Bachelor of Community Health (BCH) program, one of 16 such programs in the country currently approved by SABPAC, that provides an excellent opportunity to introduce the graduate program to prospective students and recruit them. Four students from the BCH program have been admitted into the graduate program since the spring of 1998 while other students from the undergraduate program are currently in the application process. Further, the departmental general education courses attract a variety of undergraduate majors from other colleges and from across the campus. These courses provide an excellent opportunity to introduce and recruit prospective students to community health education and health, and to the graduate program. Students from other majors including sociology and anthropology, biology, molecular biology, and nutrition are now pursuing their graduate MPH degrees in the department. The department’s undergraduate program is very popular with a total current enrollment of approximately 120 students. The undergraduate program has undergone dramatic, targeted changes to reflect better quality in its program (more faculty, stream-lining of course offerings, and field experience requirements), better quality among the students (more stringent admissions standards and requirements), and better documentation of program effectiveness and student learning outcomes.

The department has well established formal and informal collaborative ties with a number of health agencies, associations, and programs dedicated to health-related services along the border. These include the Border Health Council, SoAHEC, the AHCOP program, the Kellogg funded initiative, and the ‘Turning Point’ initiative that provide valuable opportunity to recruit prospective students as well as help students in the program gain valuable professional experience as they progress through their coursework.

The department also draws from its faculty’s strong service connections and professional relationships with health agencies and other faculty and programs to recruit prospective students. These efforts help recruit students not just from within the state but from other states into the program. Information displays at conferences (New Mexico Public Health Association and AAHE), at local health fairs, and on-campus events are used to distribute information about the program. In addition, alumni in their capacity as health professionals are encouraged to refer suitable candidates for admission into the program (e.g. Larry Benegas, New Mexico Department of Public Health and Sheila Rodriquez, Columbia LifeCare Center). The department is guided and advised, in part, by an Advisory Committee composed of a diverse group of individuals and health professionals. The committee helps in the recruitment process by providing information to those interested in the program and advising the department on changes to improve the quality and meet the evolving health needs of the community. The committee was informed about and involved in this self-study document.

The department has a well-established network of field experience sites for both undergraduate and graduate students. These sites and the field experience supervisors at these sites showcase our students and their abilities and consequently help to popularize the program in the community and attract new students into the program.

Documentation Part 2

Statement of admissions policies and procedures

Admission to the Master of Public Health in Community Health Education (MPH) program is coordinated by the graduate program coordinator (currently Dr. Stephen D. Arnold) who is assisted by the active input and involvement of the other tenure-line faculty who form the admissions committee. Every effort is made to maintain consistent admission standards that reflect the general requirements of the graduate school as well as specific requirements of the department. Students must first meet the NMSU Graduate School admission requirements. Additionally, students applying to the MPH program must meet the following minimum requirements:

Each of these requirements have specific points assigned to them as indicated on the MPH admissions evaluation sheet. Students with an overall score of 10 or more are generally admitted into the program and assigned a faculty advisor. The program encourages applications from minorities and females. The departmental admission policies and procedures reflect its commitment to qualified students who can benefit from the learning offered in the program and who can forge competent careers in health education.

Documentation Part 3

Quantitative information on the number of applicants, acceptances and admissions, over the past three years.

 

1998-99

1997-98

1996-97

Number of requests for application to MPH program

65

48

Data not available

Number of MPH applicants

25

22

11

Number of MPH students accepted

20

20

10

Number of new MPH students who matriculated

10

12

9

Enrollment as of each Spring semester

27

20

16

Documentation Part 4

Quantitative information on the number of students enrolled in each degree program identified in Criterion V. A., including a headcount of full-time and part-time students and a full-time equivalent conversion.

As of the Spring, 1999 semester there were 27 students enrolled in the Master of Public Health in Community Health Education program, Department of Health Science.

Of these 27 students, 13 were enrolled part-time and 14 were enrolled full-time. At New Mexico State University a graduate student is considered full-time if they are enrolled for at least 9 credit hours. Thus, the full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment was calculated to be 21.8 for the Spring 1999 semester (total number of credit hours for all graduate students divided by 9).

Documentation Part 5

Identification of outcome measures by which the program may evaluate its success in enrolling a qualified student body, along with data regarding the performance of the program against those measures over the past three years.

The program’s inclusion of rural and border health issues as well as its ability to offer a flexible and evening schedule of courses has attracted a number of minority students as well as those currently working in health. The number of part-time/full-time students currently in the program is summarized below.

Current number of students in the program: __27__

Number of part-time students: __13__

Number of full-time students: __14__

Number of female students: __20__

Number of male students: ___7__

Number of students serving as graduate research assistants: ___4___

Number of students serving as graduate teaching assistants: ___3___

Number of students who have graduated from program: ___5___

Number of graduates who completed a thesis ___1___

Number of graduates who completed the non-thesis option ___4___

The number of minority students in the program is viewed as a very positive aspect of the program and in keeping with the vision and mission of the program. Similarly, another positive aspect of the program is its accessibility in terms of flexible course offerings that allow professionals to pursue their degree on a part-time basis while working. As the program becomes more known, as its graduates make their mark in the profession, and as more competitive stipends and fellowships become available, we believe that the number of applications will further increase and make admissions into the program more competitive. In fact, the average undergraduate GPA of applicants has progressively increased. The results from our outcomes assessment efforts has helped us to improve the quality of the program and meet the needs of the students in these rural and border communities where much needed health efforts are often lacking.

Please see the "Fact Sheet" (next page).

 

FIGURE IX - 1: Fact Sheet

The Master of Public Health in Community Health Education at New Mexico State University program originated in the Spring of 1996 with an entering class of three students. In just three years the program has grown to a current enrollment of 27 graduate students who have matriculated in the program. The average entering undergraduate grade-point-average of students accepted and matriculated in the MPH program is 3.1 on a 4.0 scale. To date, five students have graduated from the MPH program at NMSU since its inception.

  

Recruitment success is measured by the following criteria:

CRITERIA

NUMBER DURING 1998-99 ACADEMIC YEAR

Number of inquiries about the program

65

Number of letters and program information packets sent to prospective students

65

Number of applications for admissions

25

Number of recruitment efforts at conferences and local health fairs

6

Number of recruitment efforts through health agencies and programs such as Border Health, SoAHEC, and AHCOP

Integrated as a portion of numerous events and activities

Number of students admitted per year

20

GPA of new students entering the program

3.2

Average GPA of all students currently enrolled on the program

3.1

GRE/MAT scores

Applicant scores are compared to university-wide averages maintained by the graduate school

Number of minorities admitted into the program

42%

Percentage of currently enrolled students who have another masters (or doctoral) degree

18%

These efforts indicate our recruitment success and are reflected in the increased trend in student enrollment.

The admissions rate shows an upward trend with an increase in the average GPA of those admitted. A number of minority students are currently part of the program with 18% having another Masters degree or a Ph.D./MD. The program has a set of well-defined policies and procedures that govern its admissions policies. The graduate program coordinator is supported by faculty who serve on the admissions committee.

Documentation Part 6

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

This criterion is met. The program has student recruitment and admissions policies and procedures designed to locate and select qualified individuals capable of taking advantage of the program’s various learning activities which will enable each of them to develop competence for a career in health education. The increasing number of qualified students admitted into the program is an important indicator that this criterion is being met. Inquiries from prospective students from other countries, out-of-state, or from local areas suggests that the department’s ongoing recruitment efforts appear to reach far and wide. Full-time students take an average of 2 years to complete the program and spend an average of 2 semesters to complete their thesis research.

It is anticipated that the number of admissions will increase as the program becomes better known. It is also anticipated that the quality of students who are attracted to the program will further improve. Informal and formal recruitment efforts as well as collaborative efforts with other local health agencies and programs have helped target our recruiting efforts and help introduce the program to a wider audience.

Criterion IX. B.

Stated application, admission, and degree-granting requirements and regulations shall be applied equitably to individual applicants and students regardless of age, race, disability, religion, or national origin.

Documentation Part 1

Description of policies, procedures and affirmative action plans to achieve a diverse student population.

The Master of Public Health in Community Health Education program’s application, admissions, and degree granting requirements, policies, and procedures are consistent with those of New Mexico State University (NMSU). It is the policy of NMSU to be in full compliance with all federal and state non-discrimination and equal opportunity laws and regulations. Additionally the university will not discriminate against any person on the basis of age, color, race, sex, national origin, or disability. To maintain and integrate similar policies and procedures in its applications, admissions, and degree-granting requirements, the department communicates with the EEOC, the minority programs on campus, and with students. Further, the entire full-time faculty plays a crucial role in the admitting of students by serving on the admissions committee and serving as mentors to undergraduate and other interested students. Recruitment efforts of the department encourage minority students to apply to the program.

Documentation Part 2

Quantitative information on the demographic characteristics of the student body, including data on applicants and admissions.

Quantitative information on the demographic characteristics of the student body is presented on the next page. Please note, additional demographic information is presented above in Criterion IX. A. Documentation Part 5.

 

STUDENT

STATUS

ADVISOR

CHAIR

THESIS

PROJECT

ENTERING GPA

HIGHEST DEGREE

INSTATE OR OUT

MPH STUDENTS ACCEPTED AND CURRENTLY ENROLLED

1

Accepted S98

ARNOLD

ARNOLD

X

3.130

BS

INSTATE

2

Accepted S99

MEISTER

MEISTER

2.628

BCH

INSTATE

3

Accepted F97

ARNOLD

ARNOLD

X

3.290

BS

OUT

4

Accepted F98

ARNOLD

ARNOLD

3.557

MAAG

INSTATE

5

Accepted F98

MEISTER

MEISTER

3.630

BCH

INSTATE

6

Accepted F97

MEISTER

MEISTER

3.290

BS&BA

INSTATE

7

Accepted S99

MONDRAGON

MONDRAGON

3.051

BS

INSTATE

8

Accepted F97

MEISTER

MEISTER

X

2.900

BA

INSTATE

9

Accepted S96

BRANDON

BRANDON

X

3.785

PhD

INSTATE

10

Accepted S99

KRISHNAN

KRISHNAN

3.263

BS

OUT

11

Accepted S98

BUCKINGHAM

BUCKINGHAM

X

3.625

BS

INSTATE

12

Accepted F97

KRISHNAN

KRISHNAN

X

4.000

BS

INSTATE

13

Accepted S99

ARNOLD

ARNOLD

2.333

BS

OUT

14

Accepted S99

BUCKINGHAM

BUCKINGHAM

2.720

BS

OUT

15

Accepted F96

BRANDON

BRANDON

X

2.608

MS

INSTATE

16

Accepted F97

ARNOLD

ARNOLD

X

2.900

BS

OUT

17

Accepted F98

MONDRAGON

MONDRAGON

3.190

BA

INSTATE

18

Accepted S98

KRISHNAN

KRISHNAN

X

3.567

BS&BA

INSTATE

19

Accepted S96

KRISHNAN

KRISHNAN

2.850

BS

INSTATE

20

Accepted F97

MONDRAGON

MONDRAGON

X

3.020

BS

OUT

21

Accepted F98

MONDRAGON

MONDRAGON

2.581

BS

OUT

22

Accepted S97

BUCKINGHAM

BUCKINGHAM

3.355

BA

INSTATE

23

Accepted S99

MONDRAGON

MONDRAGON

3.950

BAS

INSTATE

24

Accepted F98

MEISTER

MEISTER

2.743

BCH

INSTATE

25

Accepted F96

BRANDON

BRANDON

X

2.711

BA

INSTATE

26

Accepted S99

ARNOLD

ARNOLD

3.721

BSN

INSTATE

AVERAGE ENTERING GPA OF MPH STUDENTS CURRENTLY ENROLLED IN THE PROGRAM = 3.169

 

MPH STUDENTS ACCEPTED BUT *NOT* CURRENTLY ENROLLED

1

Accepted F98

KRISHNAN

KRISHNAN

3.400

BA

OUT

2

Accepted F98

ARNOLD

ARNOLD

3.554

BS

INSTATE

3

Accepted S99

MONDRAGON

MONDRAGON

3.000

MD

OUT

4

Accepted S99

ARNOLD

ARNOLD

3.070

BS

OUT

5

Accepted S99

BUCKINGHAM

BUCKINGHAM

MS

INSTATE

6

Accepted S99

KRISHNAN

KRISHNAN

3.500

BSW

INSTATE

7

Accepted F98

MEISTER

MEISTER

3.140

BS

OUT

8

Accepted F98

MONDRAGON

MONDRAGON

3.283

MD

OUT

9

Accepted F98

BUCKINGHAM

BUCKINGHAM

2.740

MSN

OUT

10

Accepted F98

MONDRAGON

MONDRAGON

3.341

BA

INSTATE

11

Accepted F99

MONDRAGON

MONDRAGON

3.884

BS

OUT

12

Accepted F96

MONDRAGON

MONDRAGON

3.241

BCH

INSTATE

13

Accepted S99

ARNOLD

ARNOLD

3.200

MBBS

OUT

14

Accepted S99

KRISHNAN

KRISHNAN

3.775

BA

INSTATE

15

Accepted F98

BUCKINGHAM

BUCKINGHAM

2.900

BA

OUT

16

Accepted S99

BUCKINGHAM

BUCKINGHAM

3.193

BS

INSTATE

17

Accepted F98

BUCKINGHAM

BUCKINGHAM

3.400

BSA

INSTATE

18

Accepted F99

KRISHNAN

KRISHNAN

3.500

BA

OUT

GRADUATES:

1

Accepted F96

Graduated 8/98

BRANDON

X

3.188

BS

OUT

2

Accepted F96

Graduated 12/98

MONDRAGON

X

3.049

BS

INSTATE

3

Accepted S96

Graduated '97

SIEGAL

X

3.229

BS

OUT

4

Accepted S97

Graduated 5/99

KRISHNAN

X

2.421

BA

INSTATE

5

Accepted F96

Graduated '97

SIEGAL

X

3.180

MHA

OUT

Documentation Part 3

Identification of measures by which the program may evaluate its success in achieving a demographically diverse student body, along with data regarding the program’s performance against these measures over the last three or more years.

Trends in graduate admission and enrollment are monitored by the NMSU Graduate School. This data includes demographic profiles of applicants and admitted students including ethnicity, geographic origin, undergraduate grade point averages of applicants, graduate record examination scores, full-time/part-time distribution of students, and much more. Programmatic data is compared to university-wide averages. Some program statistics are identified in Criterion IX. A., Documentation Part 5. Additional statistics are listed in Criterion IX. B., Documentation Part 2. The current ethnic distribution of currently enrolled MPH students is as follows:

42% Hispanic Americans

4% African Americans

4% Native Americans

4% Chinese

4% Iranian

42% Anglo-American

Documentation Part 4

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

This criterion is met. The application, admission, and degree-granting requirements and regulations are applied equitably to individual applicants and students regardless of age, race, disability, religion, or national origin. The large number of minority students in the program is an indication that the department’s recruiting and admissions processes have been successful. Further the focus on and inclusion of border and rural health issues, part-time and full-time study opportunities, and evening and weekend classes point to the department’s commitment to the community, its citizens, and relevant health issues. Finding innovative ways of providing fellowships and assistantships to students will make the program more attractive to all potential students and particularly to economically disadvantaged students.

 

Criterion IX. C.

There shall be available a clearly explained and accessible academic advising system for students, as well as readily available career and placement advice.

Documentation Part 1

Description of the advising and counseling services, including sample orientation materials such as student handbooks.

Upon admission into the program, students receive a letter from the department head indicating they have been accepted into the program. In this letter they are provided with the name of the full-time faculty member assigned to them as their graduate advisor. They are encouraged to meet with their advisor to introduce themselves and to become familiar with the details of their coursework in the program. They are also encouraged to meet with the department head who currently serves as the graduate program coordinator. As students progress through the program, their faculty advisors help them identify and define their areas of interest for research and help them develop strategies that will serve them well in the program. Based on students’ areas of interest, this advisor may serve as the permanent advisor or guide students to one who better fits their needs. The departmental graduate faculty also works very closely with students on their field experience placement site to make this a useful and helpful learning experience for them. The current graduate seminar course (MPH 597) further educates students on how to develop and work on their thesis research, understand the process and time-lines, and shows what to expect during a Masters defense. Graduate students are encouraged to meet with their faculty advisors frequently and also to meet with the graduate program coordinator periodically. The departmental faculty and the graduate and undergraduate program coordinators work closely and communicate often informally and formally to help meet the emerging needs of students in the program and those interested in the program. The department communicates with students regularly through a department-wide e-mail list-serve about meeting schedules, on program-related issues, and on jobs and fellowships available across the country.

One of the advantages of the department is its relatively small size. This provides students the opportunity to work closely with all faculty and make use of their professional contacts to help them with their research and future opportunities and interests. The department has strong collaborative ties with a variety of health agencies and initiatives throughout the state that can help them in advising and meeting the needs of their students. Announcements of jobs and fellowships are forwarded to students via an e-mail list-serve and by posting on the graduate program bulletin board.

The University maintains an office for career development and placement for use by all students. The office provides a variety of services including career related counseling and help, resume writing, advise on the process of job search, and interviewing skills. Our students are also in contact with various health professionals through their faculty advisors and through their field experience. These contacts help them in their job searches and in their future career planning. Several of our students attend both the local New Mexico Public Health Association and the national APHA meetings to take advantage of the discussions and lectures as well as their career placement opportunities and informational booths on doctoral programs. The departmental faculty actively encourages and helps their students in these endeavors. Additionally, the Learning Center at the University provides all students with special services and help that includes vocational testing, and seminars and classes on time and financial management and writing skills.

Students in our program have access to personal counseling services provided at the Garcia Annex. Clinical and counseling psychologists are available to provide students with confidential and professional counseling services to help them address a variety of personal problems that may affect their academic progress. These counseling services and the student health center provide valuable information to students on how to address the stresses of graduate school and how to cope with both physical and mental health concerns.

Several students in the program receive both research and teaching assistantships. Besides this, students have access to other types of financial help through the Financial Aid office and in the form of loans, scholarships, and on-campus employment. Students also have access to a limited number of external fellowships devoted to minority students.

Documentation Part 2

Information about student satisfaction with advising and counseling services.

A recent survey of students in the program indicated favorable ratings of various aspects of the program. Approximately 60% of the MPH students responded to this survey. The relevant items from this survey were:

Survey Items

Please rate the following on a scale of 1-5 (1=Excellent; 2=Very Good; 3=Good; 4=Fair; 5=Needs Improvement)

Overall level and quality of departmental advising and counseling on courses, progress in the program, and thesis/non-thesis

LEVEL: Rating _______ QUALITY: Rating ________

Comments and suggestions Comments and suggestions

Level and timeliness of information sharing by the department on course offerings, jobs, policies and procedures, and other relevant information

LEVEL: Rating _______ TIMELINESS: Rating ________

Comments and suggestions Comments and suggestions

A majority of the students (90%) who completed the survey rated the departmental advising and counseling as ‘excellent’ or ‘very good’ on both its level and quality. Similarly, all students surveyed (100%) rated the level and timeliness of information sharing process as ‘excellent’ or ‘very good.’ One suggestion for improvement included hiring more faculty who could take the load off existing graduate faculty.

 

Documentation Part 3

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

This criterion has been met successfully. Current students rate the departmental advising and counseling very high. They also rate the level and timeliness of information sharing very favorably. The close professional relationships among students and faculty helps students network and recognize the choices and options available to them in terms of doctoral programs and jobs. Other services on campus including career placement services and personal counseling services support our belief that this criterion is met.

Criterion IX. D.

Students shall, where appropriate, have participatory roles in conduct of program evaluation procedures, policy-setting and decision-making

Documentation Part 1

Description of student roles in evaluation of program functioning.

Students play an active role in the evaluation of the program and its faculty. Students share their concerns, suggestions, and ideas about the program with the department head and graduate program coordinator and with other faculty and their advisors. Students actively participate in evaluating teaching activities of faculty. They complete both informal (instructor option) and formal course evaluations in terms of quantitative ratings and in terms of qualitative and open-ended responses. Results of student course evaluations are shared with the instructor at the end of the semester, after grades have been submitted.

Graduate students also participate in the evaluation of program functioning with student representatives who attend advisory committee meetings and faculty meetings.

Documentation Part 2

Description of student roles in governance, as well as in formal student organizations.

Students participate by attending faculty meetings, by serving on faculty search committees and by participating in the interviewing process, by memberships on various departmental committees (for example the CHES committee), and by voicing their opinions to faculty during exit interviews. Students are also informed of and involved in the CEPH self-study. Based on the comments and suggestions from students, the program has been stream-lined, thesis/non-thesis options and requirements have been clarified, and better communications channels have been established for updates.

Students participate in the activities of Eta Sigma Gamma, the National Health Science Honorary Society. In addition, graduate students have taken the initiative to start an MPH graduate student association to play a more formal and active role in the policy and decision-making efforts related to the program.

Documentation Part 3

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met..

This criterion is met effectively. Students play active and participatory roles

in all aspects of the program by:

made in the program

 

EVALUATION AND PLANNING

Criterion X. A.

The program shall have an explicit process for evaluating and monitoring its overall efforts against its mission, goals, and objectives; for assessing the program’s effectiveness in serving its various constituencies; and for planning to achieve its mission in the future.

Documentation Part 1

Description of evaluation procedures and planning process being used.

The MPH program conducts and has in place efforts that can evaluate and monitor its efforts against its stated mission, goals and objectives. The flow-chart below provides a schematic of these efforts, both formal quantitative and informal qualitative.

The program evaluation, monitoring and assessment efforts include work and discussion in the following committees: 1) curriculum, 2) outcomes assessment, and 3) MPH student admissions. These committees facilitate faculty discussion and ultimately changes to curriculum, learning objectives, admissions standards, as well as student progress towards meeting degree completion requirements. Other formal mechanisms and procedures that contribute to monitoring and assessment are: 1) evaluation by faculty of the quality of student theses and defense, 2) selection and participation in community-based service projects which are sustained by student and faculty involvement, 3) field experience presentations and final binders that are submitted by each student, and 4) meetings of the department advisory committee. Informal approaches include student input to faculty during their advising sessions, and faculty examination of core course content, required readings, assignments, etc. In addition, the College of Health and Social Services periodically undertakes a strategic planning process that includes assessing and refocusing college and departmental goals and mission. This self-study document itself and the subsequent on-going re-accreditation process substantially contributes to the monitoring and assessment of the program to accomplish its mission.

All of these efforts are followed by feedback that has and continues to enhance the MPH program. This process serves to improve the program while meeting student’s professional needs and preparing them for a career in community public health. Graduate students, adjunct faculty, public health professionals in the community, and the department advisory board all contribute to these evaluation and monitoring efforts to insure that the program succeeds in meeting its stated mission, goals and objectives.

As the 1997 and 1998 outcomes assessment and annual review of results indicate, the program has a self-assessment and monitoring plan to determine how well its efforts meet the stated mission and goals of the program. The assessment plan also includes specific measures for program effectiveness as well as for graduate student learning.

Documentation Part 2

Identification of measures by which the program may evaluate the effectiveness of its evaluation and planning activities, along with data regarding the program’s performance against these measures over the last three years.

The department is actively involved in collecting data to evaluate its graduate program since its inception in the Spring of 1996.

MEASURES OF GRADUATE STUDENT LEARNING:

  1. GOAL: Satisfactory ratings for MPH students from the public for their academic work.
    1. OBJECTIVE: 95% of MPH students will receive a satisfactory rating from external reviewers who evaluate their performance for specific and appropriate courses.
  1. GOAL: Ability of MPH majors to obtain satisfactory ratings from their supervisors during field experience at health agencies.
    1. OBJECTIVE: 95% of MPH students will receive a satisfactory rating from external reviewers who evaluate their overall performance on the entry-level and graduate-level health education competencies.
  1. GOAL: Satisfactory ratings for MPH student knowledge of health education from their final examination committee.
    1. OBJECTIVE: 95% of the MPH students will receive a satisfactory rating in their final examination from committee members on questions related to health education (including questions on entry-level and graduate-level health education competencies).

Documentation Part 3

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

Thus far five students have graduated from the program with four choosing the non-thesis option and one selecting the thesis option. These students conducted their research or project on rural/border issues and on international issues. Several students currently in the program have completed their core coursework, are conducting their field experience at local agencies on relevant rural and border health issues, and are working on their individual research. The department continues to incorporate its evaluative process into the graduate classrooms (to measure student learning) and develop a database on admissions and application process and how these relate to the stated program mission and goals.

Criterion X. B.

For the purposes of seeking accreditation by CEPH, the program shall conduct an analytical self-evaluation and prepare a self-study document that responds to all criteria in this manual.

Documentation Part 1

Provision of all documentation specified as being expected.

All documentation has been provided as specified in the accreditation criteria.

Documentation Part 2

Description of the process used for the self-study.

All six (6) full-time tenure-line core faculty were assigned to write initial portions of the self-study document and were provided an opportunity to self-edit their contributions. All portions were then compiled and the entire document was edited for clarity and continuity by the department head to create a working draft copy. This working draft was then distributed back to the core faculty, to allow each member to edit the entire document. A copy was also distributed to three graduate students for review and comments. Finally, the self-study was distributed to the department advisory committee consisting of 12 area working professionals employed within health and health education.

Documentation Part 3

An analysis of the program’s responses to recommendations in the last accreditation report, if any.

This is the program's first accreditation review.

Documentation Part 4

Summary statement of the program’s strengths and weaknesses in regard to each accreditation criterion. (This statement may be organized as an executive summary, if the program so chooses.)

CRITERION

PROGRAM STRENGTHS

AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT

I - Mission, Goals and Objectives

The program has a clearly formulated and publicly stated mission with supporting goals and objectives. The program emphasizes rural and border public health issues, which are emerging and relevant issues in the practice of public health.

As the program continues to mature, the mission, goals and objectives of the program will become more refined and further incorporated into all aspects of the program.

II. A. - External Organizational Setting

The program is an integral part of an accredited institution of higher education.

There is a need to improve the visibility of the program out-of-state and internationally. This will be accomplished in part by CEPH accreditation.

II. B. - Internal Organizational Setting

The program is supported by an organizational setting conducive to teaching and learning, research and service. This organizational setting facilitates interdisciplinary communication, cooperation and collaboration and fosters the development of professional public health values, concepts and ethics.

Support for additional faculty within a typical university environment with limited (and competitive) resources.

III - Governance

The program administration and faculty have clearly defined rights and responsibilities concerning program governance and academic policies.

 

IV - Resources

The program has adequate resources to fulfill its stated mission and goals, and its instructional, research and service objectives.

Additional tenure-line faculty are needed to support program enrollment growth. Additional measures are needed to judge the adequacy of resources.

V - Instructional Programs

The program offers instructional programs reflecting its stated mission and goals, leading to an MPH in Community Health Education.

 

 

CRITERION

PROGRAM STRENGTHS

AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT

VI - Research

The program pursues an active research program, consistent with its mission, through which its students and faculty contribute to the knowledge base of community health education including research directed at improving the practice of public health.

Due primarily to heavy teaching loads, not all faculty are as productive in scholarly activities as they could be. This is anticipated to change as the program matures and additional faculty are hired.

VII - Service

The program pursues an active service program, consistent with its mission, through which students and faculty contribute to the advancement of health education practice, including continuing education.

The program has need for a part-time or full-time coordinator of service projects and student field experiences (internships).

VIII - Faculty

The program has a clearly defined faculty which, by virtue of its size, multidisciplinary nature, educational preparation, research and teaching competence, and practice experience, is able to support the program's mission, goals and objectives.

 

IX - Students

The program has student recruitment and admissions policies and procedures designed to locate and select qualified individuals capable of taking advantage of the program's various learning activities which will enable each of them to develop competence for a career in health education.

Additional recruitment efforts are being explored.

X - Evaluation and Planning

The program has a process for evaluating and monitoring its overall efforts against its mission, goals and objectives; for assessing the program's effectiveness in serving its various constituencies; and for planning to achieve its mission in the future.

Since this is a new program, the process for evaluating and monitoring overall efforts against program mission, goals and objectives, for assessing the program's effectiveness in serving its various constituencies, and for planning to achieve its mission in the future is being refined.

During the conceptual and developmental years of the MPH program, the faculty focused their priorities and attention to the underserved population along the United States/Mexico border. Our common vision is to recruit, educate and train students from this population (and throughout the United States and other nations) to enter the field of public health. Although our hope is that many of our graduates will seek employment as community health educators in the border states, they are prepared to function as community health educators in a variety of settings and communities across the nation and beyond. The program is committed to serving the health needs of underserved populations including the border states of New Mexico, Arizona, Texas and California.

 Documentation Part 5

Assessment of the extent to which this criterion is met.

The Department of Health Science offers both undergraduate and graduate degrees to serve the people of New Mexico through health science education and practice, research, and public service from the perspectives of the multi-cultural heritage of the state, the ever changing nature of the environment and an interdependent world. The undergraduate Bachelor of Community Health (BCH) is one of 16 programs in the nation to be approved by SABPAC. Since its inception in the academic year of 1996-1997, the faculty has been committed to seeking accreditation for the MPH program.

The decision to seek accreditation was made in 1998. The process of self-study and preparation of the self-study document began in January of 1999. All full-time faculty were actively involved in the self-study by working on specific portions of the self-study. Graduate students serving as GAs and TAs were involved in helping faculty in their efforts. Faculty collected data and information through a variety of surveys and compiling information on admissions, the application process, policies and procedures, strengths and weaknesses of the program, and its needs. The departmental advisory committee as well as graduate students were involved in the preparation, review, and improvement of this document.

 

 APPENDIX A

 

NMSU Organizational Chart

  

APPENDIX B

 

College Organizational Chart

 

APPENDIX C

 

Department Organizational Chart

  

 

APPENDIX D

 

Faculty Curricula Vitae

 

APPENDIX E

 

Student Handbook

 

APPENDIX F

 

Syllabi for Core MPH Courses