SELF-STUDY DOCUMENT FOR

ACCREDITATION REVIEW BY

SABPAC


NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY (NMSU)

Bachelor of Community Health

Department of Health Science
P.O. Box 30001, MSC 3HLS
Las Cruces, NM 88003-8001

Phone 505-646-4300
Fax 505-646-4343

Web site www.nmsu.edu/~hlthdpt

CONTACTS:

Satya P. Krishnan, Ph.D., CHES
Undergraduate Program Coordinator
Email
sakrishn@nmsu.edu

Stephen D. Arnold, Ph.D.
Academic Department Head
Email
sarnold@nmsu.edu

Printed on July 21, 2000

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A. PURPOSE

B. OVERVIEW

C. ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION 

D. EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM 

E. FINANCIAL RESOURCES FOR THE PROGRAM

F. FACULTY 

G. RESEARCH

H. LIBRARY FACILITIES

I. STUDENT SERVICES PROGRAM

J. PHYSICAL PLANT

APPENDICES:

A Organizational Charts
B Faculty Curriculum Vitae
C Course Evaluation Form
D Alumni Survey and Student Exit Evaluation Form
E Field Experience Evaluation Form
F Department Advisory Committee
G Independent Study Form
H Substitution and Waiver Form
I 1999 Outcomes assessment Report
J Horizontal Analysis Sheet and Matrices I-VII for Evaluation of Responsibilities and Competencies
K Field Experience Manual and Brochure
L Field Experience Sites
M Student Evaluation of Field Experience Agency Form
N Course Syllabi for Required Core Courses
O Advising Document and Degree Plan (Form A and B)
P 2000 Degree Check Sheet
Q Form C and Analysis of Writing Assessment Examination Success
R Recruitment Packet for Undergraduates
S Course Schedules, Change of Advisor Request Form, and Student Handbook
T Qualifications of Faculty (Form D)
U Faculty Responsibilities and Workload (Form E)
V Faculty Professional Development (Form F)
W Salary Comparisons
X Faculty Turnover
Y Department Personnel Positions and Nature of Work
Z Annual Performance Evaluation Forms
AA Promotion and Tenure Requirements
AB Faculty Scholarly Activities
AC Select Portions of the NMSU Bachelor of Community Health Program Web Pages
AD Student Pass Rates for CHES Examinations


  1. PURPOSE

1. Provide a brief description of the development of health education at your institution which will contain the following information:

a. A historical statement of how the current health education program evolved.

Initially, Health Science was a component of the Department of Health, Physical Education and Recreation in the College of Education at New Mexico State University. The creation of an autonomous Department of Health Science within the newly organized College of Health and Social Services (CHSS) received administrative approval and became effective on July 1, 1979. It was at this time that the department moved from the Activity Center to Breland Hall. The initial goals of the new department were to complete the reorganization process, determine educational priorities with regard to educational pursuits and curricular changes and/or additions.

b. The current purpose (mission) of the health education program.

The mission of the Department of Health Science (and the Bachelor of Community Health Program) is to

preserve and enhance the health of the public and prevent illness and injury through education, research and service programs. The departmental faculty is committed to actively participate in all of these processes.

c. The current goals and objectives of the health education program.

The overall goal of the program is to educate and train the enrolled students to become community health education specialists. Based on this overall goal, the current objectives of the program are to:

B. OVERVIEW

 

1. The relationship of the health education program with the university and with a school/college within the university.

The Department of Health Science is one of three academic departments within the College of Health and Social Services, one of six colleges within the University.

2. Identify and explain the major strengths of the health education program.

The major strengths of the health science program include the following:

1. The faculty and the expertise they contribute to the academic program. These areas of expertise include border health issues, community health education, health-related behavior change, problem-based learning, rehabilitation, hospice care, HIV/AIDS, epidemiology, reproductive health, contraceptive decision making and sexuality, domestic violence, health promotion, environmental health, occupational health, health administration and policy, vulnerable populations, managed care, and ethics.

2. Departmental faculty’s qualifications and commitment to students by providing them with academic excellence and advice.

3. A curriculum that is competency based and designed to provide "state of the art" content while remaining flexible to meet the ever changing educational and job market needs.

4. An Academic Department Head who is sensitive of the needs of the faculty, staff, and students and serves as an advocate for them with the College and University administration.

5. Students who are committed to completing the academic challenges offered by the undergraduate community health program.

6. New and improved facilities, state-of-the-class room, and advanced instructional technology

7. Faculty’s involvement in local, state, national, and international organizations, in professional health-related efforts, scholarly and research efforts, and in leadership roles in professional service

8. An individualized culminating field experience/internship placement in local, state, national, and international agencies that helps students to apply the content and theory learned in the classroom to practice

9. The existence of a variety of organizations (such as the Border Epidemiology & Environmental Health Center) to provide students valuable experience in Border and Rural Health issues

3. Identify the major needs of the health education program.

The Department anticipates the following immediate and long-term (five years) needs for the program. They are listed on the next page:

4. What changes in the health education program are anticipated for the next year? The next five years?

Changes in the next year include:

To continue current recruitment efforts but extend more targeted effort in retention. Retention will greatly improve through a newly instituted policy (June 2000) and its full and stringent enforcement. The policy requires students to complete all of the requirements and pre-requisites for enrolling in the core courses and be community health majors when enrolling in departmental courses that are 400 level. This will limit the enrollment to majors only, reduce class size, and help students receive the individual attention and supervision required in maintaining high retention rates. Due to the continued increase of student majors in community health, an increase in both the frequency and number of class sections is anticipated. Additionally, due to an increase in student demand for service courses (HLS 150: Personal Health and Wellness; HLS 286G: Wellness and Lifestyle Choices; HLS 300: Drugs and Behavior; HLS 301G: Human Sexuality; HLS 320: Human Stress Management; and HLS 380: Women's Health Issues), the department anticipates to request funds to increase the frequency and number of class sections.

Another very recent change, is the establishment of the BCH oversight committee described below. In the next year, the functions and the membership of this committee will be finalized to be able to provide valuable input into the evaluation and improvement of the BCH program. This input is critical in meeting the quality standards demanded by the accrediting body and in addressing the changing demands of the profession, the border region, and the students.

BCH OVERSITE COMMITTEE STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION

  1. PURPOSE
  2. The purpose of this oversight committee is to develop and periodically evaluate the BCH program. This committee is also responsible for BCH admission decisions; curriculum review; development and revision of mission, goals and objectives; program evaluation; program planning; strategic planning; and other issues that affect the BCH program. In addition, this committee is responsible for assuring the relevance of the BCH curriculum, the quality of instruction, the suitability and recruitment of students, and the adequacy of resources.

  3. STRUCTURE
  4. Committee Chair: BCH Program Coordinator

    Committee Members: Two BCH program faculty, a Pre-BCH advisor from the Dean’s office, one alumni representative, one BCH student representative, and one community representative.

    Ad Hoc Members: Department of Health Science Curriculum Committee Chair and Academic Department Head

  5. INITIAL CHARGE
  1. Establish a formal mechanism to track and obtain feedback from BCH students, alumni and community members.
  2. Ensure that the BCH program maintains an identity that is separate and distinct from the other programs in the department.
  3. Develop criteria by which the committee can determine if the BCH program is fulfilling its mission statement.
  4. Ensure that BCH students have a role in the decision-making that affects their program
  5. Develop a formalized system of curriculum and individual syllabus review, which also takes into consideration evaluation from students, alumni and preceptors. Ensure that the curriculum provides a balance between public health, community health education, and management and administration of health education programs. Ensure that any overlap among core BCH courses is essential, not redundant.
  6. Ensure that program and course learning objectives provide appropriate emphasis to community health education preparation, and not just to general public health.
  7. Ensure that exit interviews are completed with those who leave the program (either by graduation or other).
  8. Maintain a detailed record of those students who apply, enter, and exit the program.
  9. Continue recruitment efforts to ensure a student enrollment that continues to represent the racial and ethnic diversity of the Southwest, particularly Hispanic and Native Americans.
  10. Ensure that BCH Program web pages are expanded to include information specific to the BCH program that describes its policies and procedures, opportunities for participation in governance, availability of computers and other resources, internship sites and requirements, and information about the ESG student association

Changes in the next five years include:

In the next five years, besides implementing the changes listed in the previous page and fulfilling some of the needs previously listed, it is anticipated that the department will complete the development and implementation of a self-sufficient continuing education program. Other anticipated changes include hiring CHES certified or qualified faculty to teach core and elective BCH courses. Another change includes instituting a mechanism and process that promotes and rewards students for research projects based in underserved local communities. Discussions for such a mechanism and process are in progress and it is anticipated that the department will have such a mechanism in place in the next couple of years. Finally, another anticipated change includes increasing the visibility of Eta Sigma Gamma and promoting increased involvement of students in the honor society’s activities and in other alumni initiated activities on and off campus.

C. ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION

1. What is the official name of the department and, if appropriate, of the health education program? Does the name reflect the scope and state purpose? Comment.

The official name is the Department of Health Science. This name reflects the scope and purpose of the Department, which offers the Bachelor of Community Health, Bachelor of Science in Environmental and Occupational Health (new degree program to begin in Fall 2000), and a Master of Public Health (MPH) in Community Health Education.

2. Prepare a chart showing the locations and administrative structure of the health education program within the university administrative structure.

The organizational chart that shows the locations and administrative structure of the health education program within the larger University administrative structure is included in Appendix A.

a. Does the location of the health education program provide maximum opportunity for meeting its educational goals? Why or why not?

Yes, it does. The location of the health science program within the CHSS allows for its visibility and quality assurance that help recruit students from within the state and from across the country. The Dean of CHSS supports the efforts of the Department in a variety of ways. In addition, the department (through the efforts of the faculty and the Associate Dean) are involved in developing and maintaining mutually supportive and collaborative relations with various agencies, professional organizations, and other programs across the nation. The Associate Dean serves on the SABPAC, the SOPHE professional preparation committee, and is a SOPHE anchor to the University.

b. Describe how decisions are made for the health education program in the following areas:

i. Academic Affairs (curriculum, admissions, library facilities).

Curricula decisions are within the purview of the faculty. This responsibility is taken seriously and curricular evaluation is an ongoing process to produce a high quality, responsive, and flexible curriculum. The faculty assumes the responsibility for maintaining a curriculum that has a solid knowledge base, reflects the educational needs of the students, and meets the commitment of and competency required of the profession.

Admissions criteria identified by the University and the CHSS have been made more stringent to attract high quality and motivated students to the Department of Health Science. Decisions about admissions are made by the Department Head and the Undergraduate Program Coordinator. All students admitted into the degree program are required to meet the department’s admissions requirements (discussed later in this report).

Library facilities are utilized by faculty, staff, and students from the Department. Decision regarding books, periodicals, and other library services are coordinated by the department’s library liaison with input from the departmental faculty and communicated to all by e-mail.

ii. Student affairs (counseling, advisement, student health services, student government).

A comprehensive list of campus based available student affairs/services are included below. Input related to decisions in these areas may occur in a variety of ways, such as directly to/from the Department Head; through faculty involvement on College and University committees; and through direct student input and participation on committees. Students from the Department are encouraged to participate in student government and have served as elected student representatives.

Student services include the following:

In addition, the departmental faculty serves on the following university committees related to student affairs:

    1. Alcohol and Drug Abuse Committee
    2. Sexual Misconduct Task Force, and
    3. Wellness Committee.

iii. Financing and business management (plant operations, non-academic personnel administration, student aid, etc.).

The Department Head represents the department in decisions relating to financing and business management by providing input and considerations to the Dean of CHSS in accordance to existing NMSU policies and procedures. The Department Head serves as a liaison and communicates decisions regarding finances, funding, and business management to the department faculty and staff. Additionally, the Department Head communicates directly with the Personnel (Human Resources) department on issues related to all staff (classified, professional, and faculty).

iv. Public relations and development activities (alumni office, news bureau, research & development, community affairs).

Input in these areas is provided via individual faculty interactions within and among the groups listed above. Faculty members are accessible and often serve to initiate and provide support in these areas. Recommendations for public relations and developmental efforts are approved by the Department Head and College Dean. The Department is represented by the college Associate Dean and advising staff at various fall receptions and spring honors nights throughout the state to promote the college’s programs including the community health degree and to recruit eligible and interested students. The Department, through the college Associate Dean, is also actively involved in the planning of the first institution-wide capital campaign.

3. Describe the functions, responsibilities, and activities of the health education program Director. (Include an official university statement, if available.)

The Undergraduate Program Coordinator directs the Bachelor of Community Health Program (BCH) and reports directly to the Academic Department Head. The program coordinator has a doctorate in community health education and CHES certification, requirements for this position. The duties and responsibilities of the Undergraduate Program Coordinator are listed on next page:

The Academic Department Head serves as the administrative leader of the Department. It is this person's responsibility to provide guidance, direction, and vision for the Department. This Department Head also serves as the liaison/advocate between the faculty and the Dean of CHSS and provides a direct line of communication between them. In addition, the Department Head serves in the role of mentor/evaluator for both faculty and staff. Finally, in general the head serves as a supportive advocate and advisor to the undergraduate and graduate students, resolving conflicts and addressing evolving issues.

4. Describe the administrative and organizational functions, responsibilities, and activities of the program faculty.

Faculty members participate in decisions regarding appropriate administrative and organizational functions. For example, faculty members are elected to serve on various departmental, college, and university committees. They are expected to comply with departmental, college, and university administrative policies and rules such as submitting grades before the assigned deadline each semester. All faculty provide student advisement and concentrate most of their effort on teaching, research/scholarly activities, service areas as listed in the departmental and college guidelines for performance evaluations, and assigned administrative duties.

5. List the committees on which the health education faculty serves. Briefly state the purpose of each committee. List the name of the health education faculty members currently serving on each committee.

The departmental faculty serves on various departmental, college, and university committees that are listed on the following pages (7-11). A brief description of the committees is also included in these pages of the self-study document. Besides graduate and undergraduate student advisement, faculty members serve on a variety of committees.

DEPARTMENT COMMITTEES (Department of Health Science – Academic Year 2000-01)

COMMITTEE

CHAIR

OTHER MEMBERS

CHES Continuing Education Review

Cardenas

Krishnan, Brandon + other CHES certified individuals

Degree Program - BCH Oversight Committee

BCH Program Coordinator

Velarde, Cardenas, alumni rep, student rep, community rep, curriculum committee chair, academic department head

Degree Program - BCH Undergraduate Coordinator

Krishnan

 

Degree Program - EOH Undergraduate Coordinator

Arnold

 

Degree Program - MPH Graduate Coordinator

Arnold

 

Degree Program - MPH Oversight Committee

MPH Program Coordinator

Krishnan, Velarde, alumni rep, student rep, community rep, curriculum committee chair, academic department head

Department - Curriculum Committee

Mondragon

All full-time faculty

Department - External Advisory Committee

Academic Department Head

(see list attached)

Department - Library Liaison

Mondragon

All full-time faculty

Department - Outcomes Assessment Coordinator

Krishnan

All full-time faculty

Department - Promotion And Tenure

Mondragon

Two other tenured faculty member in the department and/or college

Department - Web Page Updates

Arnold

All full-time faculty

Student - Eta Sigma Gamma Faculty Advisor

Krishnan

 

Student - Field Experience Supervision

 

All full-time faculty

Student - MPH Organization Faculty Advisor

Krishnan

 

Department faculty are also elected or appointed to college committees including:

COLLEGE COMMITTEES

Admissions Appeals Committee

Buckingham, + other faculty members in the college

Appeals Committee

Krishnan + other faculty members in the college

Curriculum Committee

Mondragon + other faculty members in the college

Interdisciplinary Education Committee

Mondragon + other faculty members in the college

Promotion & Tenure

Buckingham + other faculty members in the college

Research Council

Krishnan + other faculty members in the college

Strategic Planning Committee

Arnold, Meister, Krishnan + other faculty members in the college

Department faculty are also elected or appointed to university committees including:

UNIVERSITY COMMITTEES

Athletic Council

Buckingham + other university faculty

Faculty Senate

Krishnan, Mondragon + other university faculty

Faculty Senate Committee On Committees

Mondragon + other university faculty

Faculty Senate Library Committee

Krishnan + other university faculty

General Education Assessment

Arnold + other university faculty

University Research Council

Krishnan + other university faculty

Visiting Professor Selection Committee

Buckingham + other university faculty

DESCRIPTION OF COMMITTEES

CHES CONTINUING EDUCATION REVIEW COMMITTEE: Members of the Certified Health Education Specialist Event Approval Committee are responsible for reviewing applications from continuing education event providers and making recommendations for approval. Meetings of the Committee take place on a periodic and on an as-needed basis.

COLLEGE APPEALS COMMITTEE: Serve as the departmental representative on the committee, which process student appeals.

COLLEGE RESEARCH COUNCIL: Serves as departmental representative to read and advise on small grant proposals for funding, organize two events per year on research issues for the college, serve in an advisory capacity to the dean on research issues and needs of the college.

COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES: A Faculty Senate Committee consisting of Senior Senators. Appoints other senators to specific committees.

CURRICULUM: (College) Meets annually under the direction and supervision of the college dean. Other members are from Nursing and Social Work. Considers, discusses questions and recommendations, reviews proposed changes to curriculum, then makes recommendations to the chair.

CURRICULUM: (Department) Considers, discusses questions and recommendations, reviews proposed changes to curriculum, then makes recommendations to the chair.

DEPARTMENT WEB PAGE UPDATE: Design, modify, update and expand departmental web pages.

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEGREE DEVELOPMENT: Develop curriculum and full proposal to create a new undergraduate degree program in environmental health at NMSU.

ETA FACULTY ADVISOR: Serve in an advisory capacity, guiding and helping the group to achieve their goal and vision, attend some of their events, assist officers when requested.

FACULTY SENATE LIBRARY COMMITTEE: (a) Actively monitor university-wide faculty concerns about university library resources, policy and services, (b) work with the dean of the library in developing library policies which meet the needs of faculty, staff and students, (c) advise and consult with the university administration about: (1) the state of the library: resources, services and policy, and (2) the university commitment necessary to assure that the library adequately serves the teaching, research and public service missions of the university.

GRADUATE PROGRAM COORDINATOR: Maintain enrollment and admissions statistics, coordinate faculty review of all completed student admission applications, assign faculty advisors to newly admitted students, meet with prospective students, coordinate mailing of information and application packets to prospective students.

INTERDISCIPLINARY EDUCATION COMMITTEE: reviews issues that affect the entire college, i.e., College Curriculum.

LIBRARY LIAISON: Work with the library to identify and order new books and journals needed by the department.

MPH ADMISSIONS: Review applications, meet to discuss new graduate student admissions, develop criteria and scoring for admission of incoming students.

OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT COORDINATOR: Develop assessments for classes for faculty use at the mid-point and end of a semester, collect data that may be relevant for outcomes measurement for the department, author the annual "Outcomes Assessment" report.

PROMOTION AND TENURE: Conduct reviews of the qualifications of each candidate for promotion and tenure. Reviews each faculty member's "Annual Performance Evaluation" each year. This committee is advisory to the academic department head and recommendations based upon the findings of the reviews are submitted in writing.

UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM COORDINATOR: Meets with pre-BCH or other interested students, processes admissions of students twice per year, coordinates field experience orientation and final presentations, develops tracking forms that can help in tracking decisions about student admissions. The Coordinator reports directly to the Department Head. Specifically, the duties and the responsibilities of the undergraduate program coordinator are listed below:

UNIVERSITY SENATE: Meets regularly, discusses new legislation and policy and brings them to a vote.

6. What provisions are made to develop and maintain a high level of communication between the health education faculty and all other levels of the university?

Communications between the Department faculty and personnel in other levels of the College and University are maintained in a variety of ways. Each semester, all faculty are invited by the President to attend a university-wide formal meeting, which provides for an opportunity to become informed about the current state of the University. As the beginning of each fall semester the Dean of the College holds a College faculty meeting which helps the faculty to learn about the activities of CHSS. Additionally, there are written communications (memos and e-mail) as well as departmental and university newsletters to communicate relevant information. Further, departmental faculty serving on college and university committees has the opportunity to report back to the faculty during departmental faculty meetings. The College Dean convenes regular meetings of the College department heads every four to six weeks during the spring and fall semesters. Information from these meetings related to university and college-wide matters is relayed back to the departmental faculty at weekly meetings.

7. What provisions are made within the department to plan and coordinate programs and curricula (including resources) with other departments in the school and in the university?

The Department continues to be open to exploring opportunities to collaborate both within and outside of the CHSS and within and outside of the University. The college has formed a new interdisciplinary education committee chaired by the Associate Dean that is reviewing ways of increasing the sharing of courses and other ways of academic collaborations and recourses sharing within the college and with other colleges. A focus on US-Mexico border health and on gerontological health puts the Department of Health Science at the forefront of these efforts as it exclusively offers courses in each topic area. On a related front, a new grant from the Paso Del Norte Health Foundation will support student-initiated undergraduate and graduate research projects in health education, health promotion, and public health relevant to the border communities. Success of this initiative will be documented based on the number of majors from other departments and colleges are involved in these funded research efforts. Thus, this funding requires that the department and its faculty to raise awareness about health education and health promotion and their role in maintaining and improving the public health of the border communities. It will also require marketing this funded initiative and its mandate across the entire campus and to all the departments. The Department also coordinates the teaching of HLS/PE 286G and HLS/PE 320 courses with the Department of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance (PERD) in the College of Education. Both Health Science and PERD faculty team-teach HLS 286G. The course HLS 380G (Women’s Health Issues) is cross-listed by the departments of Health Science and Women’s Studies.

In addition, the Department coordinates the provision of professional and continuing education credits (CHES) for a variety of health-related events and professionals through the New Mexico. In addition, the department, with the collaboration of Southern Area Health Education Center (SoAHEC) and the New Mexico Border Health Education Training Center (BHETC), provides professional and continuing educational programs. Both Centers are discussed under section E-2 of the self-study. The Department also operates the Border Epidemiology and Environmental Health Center (BEC), collaboratively with the Border Health office of the NM Department of Health. The Border Epidemiology and Environmental Health Center (BEC) invites and promotes interdisciplinary research, education, and service through its REACH (research, education, and community health) strategies and efforts.

8. What administrative provisions are made for the faculty to participate in service programs in the college, university, community, region, and nation?

Consistent with the purposes of a land-grant institution, NMSU has a major emphasis on university-based and community service. At the Department level, performance evaluations document the percentage of effort each faculty devotes to service (ranging between 10%-15%) along with effort to teaching and research. Departmental support exists in terms of considering requests for consultation, granting time away from teaching responsibilities for community service, and for allocating specific dollars to support local and out-of-state travel. The Department encourages its faculty to participate as officers of professional organizations and to accept committee work. In addition, the university also encourages international consultation and exchange among its faculty. International travel is coordinated through the office of the Vice President for International Programs. The BEC (referred to in item #7 above), SoAHEC, and BHETC are actively involved in providing opportunities to promote community level service among university students and faculty. One example is SoAHEC’s Kellogg Graduate Nursing and Medical Education Initiative that allows for the university faculty and students to work in underserved local communities such as Chaparrel and Lordsburg to help them empower themselves, identify their own social and health needs, priorities, and possible solutions that highlight the communities’ own strengths and seek and raise funds for the various efforts. This initiative aims to help individuals and communities find long-term solutions to health concerns by addressing not just access and availability issues but the root causes to health disparities such as poverty. In summary this initiative aims to help individuals and communities build their capacities so that they are proactive in decision-making regarding their health and wellbeing.

9. What services have the health education faculty provided during the past two years to the institution, constituencies both on and off campus, and to the profession?

In the past two years, the departmental faculty members continue their service to the university by serving on several committees at both the College and University level. In addition, faculty is involved in service efforts in the community (for example, involvement with Habitat for Humanity and other community agencies). The departmental faculty is also involved in service to the profession by serving on the editorial boards of journals, reviewing of grants etc. Refer to faculty curriculum vitae for a complete listing of their service to the university, the profession, and to the community (Appendix B).

10. What plans have been projected for changes and developments in the organization and administration of the health education program for the next five year period? (Exclude plans for curriculum development.)

Currently the following are the projected plans for changes and developments in the organization and administration of the health education program are:

A more equitable provision of recognition within the department in terms of a course reduction and/or additional compensation

11. What provisions have been made for continuous study and evaluation of the organization and administration of the health education program?

The Department has developed an evaluation model that includes distributing evaluation questionnaires to current students, graduates, and potential and current employers. Students evaluate the faculty’s teaching and courses at the end of each semester using a standardized survey (Appendix C). Additionally the faculty participates in a yearly review of the department's organization and administration to determine if and when changes need to occur. Finally, faculty also participates in long-range planning, communicate, and discuss various program-related concerns in regularly scheduled faculty meetings. Department Heads are in turn, evaluated according to the policies and procedures described in the NMSU Administration, Policies, and Procedures manual at the end of their second year of service and every three years thereafter. All faculty and departmental staff (including department heads) are evaluated annually as part of the NMSU Performance Evaluation System. Additional evaluation data comes from the annual Outcomes Assessment Report (Appendix I), from the student exit interview (Appendix D), and from field experience evaluations (Appendices M and E).

12. What effort has been made to determine the image of the health education programs viewed by the following:

a. Alumni:

Alumni surveys have been used to solicit important and helpful information from program alumni about the quality and utility of the BCH program, their current job status, plans for further education or job changes. The most recent survey was completed in the spring of 1999. A copy of the Alumni survey is included in Appendix D.

b. Other programs in the department, school, or college:

The feedback received from other programs in the department and college has been informal in nature and has contributed to discussions and program related policies that are oriented toward problem-solving (student advisement situations, dual-majors, etc.). For example, the department’s MPH program and its requirements and needs, helped in determining some of the changes instituted in the BCH program.

c. The dean of the school/college administering the health education program:

The Dean of the CHSS meets on a regular basis with the Department Head for updates and to reiterate continued support to the Department.

d. Employers of alumni and Field experience preceptors:

Formal evaluations (included in Appendix E) and informal meetings among departmental faculty, field experience preceptors and students play a key role in maintaining meaningful communications among all as well as an effective way of conducting process and outcomes assessments of students’ field experiences. Faculty maintains communications and connections with alumni and the various local employers to make sure that the program meets the needs of the employers and the alumni. A few of the employers and field experience preceptors serve on the departmental advisory committee and provide valuable advice and suggestions on maintaining the quality of the program.

e. Other health educators in the area:

The Department is supported by its Advisory Committee composed of 12 professionals in the fields of health education and public health. As indicated above they are also employers and field experience preceptors for the department’s majors. The names of the 12 members of the advisory committee, their educational qualifications, and job titles are included in Appendix F. Additionally, the department relies on all the health educators in the area to assist in maintaining the quality of the program, providing field experience opportunities to students, for consultation opportunities and guest lectures in courses, and for opportunities for students to conduct independent, special, or research projects.

 

D. EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM

1. Program Development

a. Document the consistency between stated program objectives and the current program. List any apparent inconsistencies.

There is consistency between the stated program objectives and the current program. This consistency is reflected in the goals and objectives of the program and the various program-related activities and changes. The following are the goals and objectives of the program:

All the courses and field experiences offered by the department are designed to provide the BCH majors with a high quality education and hands-on experience in community health and health education. These are aimed to prepare majors for careers in public/community health and health education, to get CHES certified, to be able to conduct research, plan, implement, and evaluate programs, to serve as educators and advocates on issues that affect the health of various communities, to develop collaborative relationships with other professions, uphold the ethics and standards of the profession, and prepare for leadership roles and/or for higher education. Hence there is consistency between the stated program objectives and the current program

i. What changes are anticipated in courses or activities during the next five years?

Expanded usage of student-centered, problem-based multi-disciplinary approach to education will be encouraged in the future. This technique has been the instructional format used in HLS 463: Inter-disciplinary seminar. Further community based service/experiential projects will be expanded to become a part of most courses, particularly in the core courses, as done currently in HLS 275, HLS 301, HLS 464, HLS 476, and HLS 499.

ii. Are the anticipated changes consistent with the statement of needs in Section 1 above? Give reasons and priorities.

Yes. These priorities are consistent with the stated objectives of the program and are based on input from current students and recent graduates, from alumni surveys and from the advisory council and faculty in the department. The focus on practical professional experience and increased frequency of courses are expected to meet the expressed needs of employees and students in the program. Finally, increased frequency of required course offerings and increased frequency of electives that are most popular, will be part of the other changes anticipated for the program.

b. What is the official procedure for initiating changes in the curriculum?

The official procedure for initiating change in the curriculum begins with a discussion of the proposed changes in educational needs and curriculum among the members of the curriculum committee. Following discussion, a recommendation for change may be made by a faculty member and voted in consensus or majority by the rest of the faculty. At the next regularly scheduled faculty meeting the recommendation is presented and a vote taken. If the recommendation is successful it is advanced to the College Curriculum Committee for consideration.

Curriculum changes/additions are discussed at the College Curriculum Committee and a vote is taken. Approved changes are then typed on Course Change Forms (flimsies), re-submitted to the College Committee for a final review to ensure accuracy and then forwarded to the University's Courses and Curricula Committee. All curricula changes are listed on flimsies from each college. They are then circulated to each academic department for review and comment. A department head may challenge any course changes and/or additions. When such a challenge occurs, the associate dean from the concerned college communicates the objections back to the department head from the originating department. If a satisfactory solution is not found, then the associate deans and department heads meet jointly in an effort to seek a resolution. Should the objections not be resolved at this point, the matter is referred to the Executive Vice President for a final decision.

i. What factors encourage change?

Factors that encourage change include the following:

ii. What factors serve as barriers to change? Explain.

Barriers to change include time and financial limitations:

c. What options do students have in planning their own program? Explain.

All students enrolled in the Bachelor of Community Health complete the same core curriculum. Students may select to concentrate their electives in a specific area of personal interest. Usually, students plan their 34 elective credits based on their interests and priorities and through consultations with their faculty advisors. Students may also enroll in independent study (3-6 credit hours) under the guidance of their faculty advisor to work on special projects in their area of interest

d. Are there opportunities for the student to explore special interest areas within the program e.g., consumer issues, nutrition, sex education, counseling, community organization, planning, administration, etc.)? If so, list.

Yes, a block of 34 elective hours that is a part of the degree program in community health provides students the opportunity to explore areas of special interest. Students may opt to use these hours to complete a minor within any department or complete courses in their areas of interest (e.g. alcohol use and prevention, from the School of Social Work). Students may also receive advice concerning minor options that the faculty believe may facilitate their learning and skills and in securing employment. Minors in business administration and/or health services administration are often recommended.

e. Is it possible for students to redirect their program once they have started? If so, are credits lost in doing so? Explain.

Yes, it is possible for students to redirect their focus. Usually, credits are not lost during this process. One mechanism that can be utilized to accomplish this is ‘substitution’. Following a discussion with the faculty advisor and the Department Head, specific courses may be substituted in place of others. However, the Department cannot guarantee that all courses completed prior to entering the community health degree program will be appropriate substitutes for courses offered by the department. Courses taken prior to entering the health science program may also be used to account for some of the 34 credits needed for a minor. Finally, the Department is flexible with transfer students who have taken their ‘General Educationcourses that are different from those recommended by the Department, if they are approved by the university for general education credit. Such substitutions have to be approved by the Associate Dean of the College of Health and Social Services.

f. Are curriculum adaptations made for students with special needs? If so, explain.

Yes, curriculum adaptations are made for students with special needs. Faculty allows the audio-taping of lectures for those students who are visually impaired. Faculty also attempts to provide instruction that use more than one sensory input mode. Accommodations are made for students with special needs based on the recommendations from the director of student services for taking exams and participating actively in the classroom and in their own learning. Additionally, faculty is also exploring self-instructional models for students who may require reinforcement at their own pace. Finally, the ‘Office of Students with Disabilities’ helps faculty develop ways to address the educational needs of students with disabilities.

g. Is there an independent study program? If so, how is it evaluated?

Yes, there is an independent study option within the Department. This option is typically utilized in situations where a student wishes to conduct a research study or an in-depth literature review of a specific topic that has not been covered in regular classes. It may also be used when a course is not being taught in a particular semester and the student needs the course to meet graduation requirements. In this situation, the identified faculty member and the student develop specific course requirements, assignments, and criteria for evaluation. An enrollment form is completed that documents the goals and objectives, readings, assignments, and other requirements to successful complete the independent study. The enrollment form is included in Appendix G. The necessary substitution and waiver form is included in Appendix H.

h. Are requests for program additions considered from all persons in the program, particularly students and faculty most intimately involved? If not, what are the limitations?

Yes, requests for program additions are encouraged and considered from both faculty and students. The Advisory Committee is another mechanism that provides input regarding programs additions and changes.

i. What is the minimum number of credit hours students must earn to complete the health education program?

The minimum number of credit hours necessary to complete the program is 128 hours.

  1. PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS

a. How is the total program evaluated by the faculty, by the students, and by outside groups?

The table on the next page is the program effectiveness and outcomes assessments plan used by the department to evaluate the effectiveness of its undergraduate program and student learning. These measures have been in place for the past 5 years and developed by the entire faculty.

Program Effectiveness and Outcomes Assessment Plan

UG-A. MEASURES OF UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS

GOAL

OBJECTIVE

EVIDENCE TO BE OBTAINED

I. Ability to recruit qualified majors.

The department will recruit at least 20 students with the potential for success in completing the BCH.

80% of those admitted will have overall GPA at or above 2.5 as verified by copies of latest transcripts attached to admissions application form. Also, 80% of those admitted to the department’s UG degree programs will be at or above the 50%ile on writing assessment.

II. Ability to retain majors.

The department will successfully retain through graduation at least 40% of those students who are officially admitted to the major(s).

Academic monitoring of annual student cohorts beginning with the 1996-1997 entering class (first anticipated graduation to be 1998-1999 for transfers).

III. Ability to obtain above average ratings on program quality among those graduating seniors completing exit interview.

The department will have its overall BCH degree program quality rated at or above 4.0 on the on the 5.0=excellent scale.

Exit interviews will continue to be conducted by the department head among graduating seniors taking HLS 478,496, or 499.

IV. Ability to place graduates.

At least 60% of BCH graduates who respond to an alumni survey will find (1) employment in health-related settings or (2) will begin graduate area within 12 months of graduation.

Alumni employment/ advance degree surveys will be mailed out at 12 to 18 months post graduation in January of each year.

 

At least 60% of employers of BCH students will respond positively on how the program has prepared its students for entry-level work in the field.

Results of employer (when known) surveys conducted via the mail and/ or phone conducted at least every two years.

V. Ability to obtain/ maintain program recognition.

To main full SABPAC approval of BCH.

Results from appropriate approval/ accrediting bodies.

VI. Ability to make contributions to the profession.

Department will co-sponsor or approve at least 4 continuing education events per year for CHES. At least 25% of its faculty will continue to serve on state or national professional organization committees.

Number of CHES continued education events approved and offered per year will be tracked by the bi-annual progress reports. Review of each faculty member’s most recent annual evaluation by department head to determine the percentage holding state/national office or serving professional organizations.

VII. Ability to work collaboratively to enhance health outcomes.

Department’s faculty (at least 50%) will serve on local or state-level committees.

Review of each faculty member’s most recent annual performance evaluation document by department head.

 

UG-B MEASURES OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT LEARNING

I. Ability of academic majors to obtain satisfactory ratings from public for their academic work.

75% of BCH majors will receive a satisfactory rating from external reviewers who evaluate their performance.

Evaluations from poster sessions in HLS 471 or similar required course that involves public presentations.

II. Ability of academic majors to obtain satisfactory ratings from health education supervisors at community agencies.

75% of BCH majors will receive a satisfactory rating from external reviewers who evaluate their overall performance in the entry-level health education competencies.

Preceptor evaluations completed as part if HLS 480 (renumbered HLS 496 in 1997-1998 catalog)—Field Experience requirements.

III. Ability of academic majors to pass the CHES (Certified Health Education Specialist) exam

75% of the BCH majors will successfully pass the CHES exam

The number of students who enroll in the one-credit CHES preparatory course offered by the Department and the results from the certification exam

IV. Ability of academic majors to obtain satisfactory ratings of their knowledge of community health education from representative group of external public health employees.

 

 

75% of BCH majors will receive a satisfactory rating from external examiners who evaluate their performance on a case study presented as part of an oral examination.

Examiner evaluations conducted as part of the course requirements in HLS 499 -Problems in Health Education (the department’s undergraduate capstone course).

Based on the measures listed in the above table, the table below lists how and who compiles the evidence/data for these measures.

Variables Measures
A. Recruitment success

Measured by the number of Pre-Community and Community Health majors. Obtained from the Dean’s office

B. Retaining success

Determined from the admissions and graduation data maintained by the college Dean’s office and the Departmental Undergraduate Program Coordinator

C. Ratings from graduating seniors Compiled from exit interviews conducted by the Departmental Head
D. Job placement for program graduates  Compiled by the Undergraduate Program Coordinator and Department Head from follow-up/Alumni surveys sent out yearly to program graduates
E. Ability to meet employers needs Compiled by the Undergraduate Program Coordinator and Department Head every 2 years through interviews/surveys with local employers
F .Ability to obtain/maintain program By making necessary changes in the program, for recognition example in terms of the courses offered and their sequence and changes in the requirements for admittance into the program. By seeking re-approval of the program
G. Ability to make contributions to the profession By reviewing and approving CHES credits for a number of continuing education event. This is done by the CHES committee that is composed of faculty members, certified health educators from the community, and graduate students
H. Ability to work collaboratively with the Community to enhance health Measured by the number of faculty who serve on various 

agency boards, serve as consultants and advisors to agencies, Organize campus-wide community health educational and awareness campaigns, and by involving students in such efforts

 

 

  

Students’ learning in the program is measured in a variety ways. In general, undergraduate courses in the department include writing assignments, hands-on community health related experience, and feedback mechanisms to students that promote and monitor their learning. However the following courses were specifically chosen to assess students’ learning as they progress in the program.

Course # Course Title Measure of student learning

HLS 100* Introduction to Health Science Writing assessments 
Abstract development Searches on the internet
*This is the first departmental course that is web-facilitated and being taught as a hybrid course using both traditional and new instructional techniques
HLS 275 Foundations in Health Education

Development of an understanding of the basic concepts of health education and public health through team and group projects such as writing a proposal. This assignment is designed to help students learn how to write goals and objectives based on needs assessments. Thus each project or aspect of it is designed to familiarize students with and offer them hands-on experience in community health education

HLS 395 Foundations of Public Health Understanding public health and epidemiological concepts through research paper(s) and exams
HLS 471 Resources and Computer 
Applications in Health Education
Through multiple projects  including developing Gantt charts, grant budgets, newsletters, and brochures. The course also uses completion of health risk assessments, development of a resume and sample cover letter, and familiarity with health data-bases as ways to measure student learning
HLS 475 Methods in Community Health Development of a grant proposal through work in small Planning groups and in a series of "step" assignments
HLS 478 Health Program Evaluation and Research Through an evaluation Design Project that focuses on development of goals, criteria and process of criteria, and measures to evaluate a specific process or issue
HLS 496 Community Health Field Experience

Through evaluations from  field supervisor and faculty of the hands-on projects completed by students in 320 hours at a health agency-local, national, or international

HLS 499 Problems in Health Education

This Capstone course includes three projects to integrate theoretical and practical learning among seniors

These courses have been designed to be taken in sequence and help to chart students’ progress in the program and as a tool for advising students on course selection and course load.

Continuous study and evaluation of the health science program is conducted using the previously described evaluation and assessment plan and both formative and summative evaluation strategies. Formative evaluation is conducted among others by encouraging students on an ongoing basis to direct immediate concerns related to classes to the specific faculty member. If this does not result in a satisfactory resolution to the problem, the student is directed to the Academic Department Head. Another mechanism which is formative in nature is the ongoing input received from the Department of Health Science Advisory Committee. The committee is composed of representatives from the community, professionals, program alumni, and current students. Input received from the committee membership is communicated to faculty directly in meetings or indirectly by the Department Head.

Summative evaluation is conducted on a regular basis via student course evaluations. At the end of each semester, each student is asked to complete a course evaluation (Appendix F). A neutral person (another faculty member) administers the evaluation. The faculty member is not present in the classroom while the evaluation is conducted. Students are asked to complete a structured component as well as to provide narrative comments specific to the course. Upon completion, the evaluation forms are returned to the Department Secretary who assumes the responsibility for their compilation. The structured items in the evaluation forms, are analyzed by the NMSU Computer Center. The narrative comments are typed as written by the department staff and provided to faculty. The results are made available to the individual faculty member at the conclusion of the semester.

b. How is feedback provided to the faculty, students, and outside groups?

Feedback is provided to the faculty via regular faculty meetings, through University, College and department memos, e-mail and list serve and in "working" group meetings and departmental committees. Each faculty discusses their teaching evaluations at least annually with the Department Head. These overall evaluation remarks are also shared with the College Dean and Graduate Dean for performance evaluation purposes. Feedback is provided to students through meetings with department faculty, scheduled appointments with Department head and/or faculty, in the Department Student Handbook, by e-mails and list serve, and during Field Experience Presentations and during other gatherings. Feedback is provided to and obtained from the Advisory Committee and other outside individuals/groups through scheduled meetings and through community interactions. Based on feedback received from many of the previously mentioned constituencies, the following changes were instituted to further improve the quality of the undergraduate program.

Changes instituted in 1999

Based on the departmental assessment activities, the undergraduate program (BCH) has undergone some changes as reflect better quality and education for students and to respond effectively to community health needs. Further, it has been valuable in maintaining a high level of program effectiveness. This information also served to help in both short-term and long-term planning. In the short-term it helped to maintain and improve faculty teaching and course content, in student learning and skill building, and in preparing students to meet the growing demands of the profession and communities. In the long-term the information will help to maintain SABPAC approval and for the accreditation of our graduate program. Some of these changes include the following:

I .Separation of the program planning and evaluation course (formerly HLS 478) into two courses (HLS 473 and HLS 478) to adequately cover all content areas and provide hands-on experience to students

2.Offering the Health Risk Reduction course (HLS 476) before the HLS 499, the capstone course, so that students are adequately prepared and able to actively participate in the HLS 499 seminar course and HLS 496.

3.Some of the core courses such as HLS 275, HLS 395, and HLS 471 are being offered more frequently to meet student needs.

4.The admission requirements have been streamlined and yet remain stringent to recruit good caliber students into the BCH major.

5.Course offerings and frequency of course offerings have been streamlined so that students can prepare and plan their study and anticipate the time of their graduation accurately

6.The field experience manual has been updated and reformatted and a new brochure developed to provide students with all the necessary (Appendix K). The forms required for enrolling in field experience are also available on the department’s web pages (www.nmsu.edu/~hlthdpt).

7. A number of new field experience sites have been added to existing ones and information about these sites is compiled in a binder that is maintained in the department office and available to students for consultations

8. Hiring of new and highly qualified faculty to fill in the gaps in curriculum coverage (Dr. Dow Velarde and Ms. Cardenas)

9.Improved and expanded web pages containing forms and other relevant and updated information for the undergraduate students including the field experience manual

10.Requirements for the undergraduate field experience have been clarified via a new departmental brochure and on the web pages

11. Students are regularly updated on program-related issues and availability of jobs through the departmental e-mail system and list serve

c. How is instruction evaluated by the faculty, by the students, and by outside groups? Include evaluation forms as appropriate.

Instruction is evaluated on a regular basis. Individual faculty members receive feedback from student evaluations at the end of each semester to help improve and modify their instructions and course content. Both quantitative scores and qualitative remarks are solicited in these evaluations. The faculty revamped this evaluation form this year (Appendix C). As stated previously the evaluation results are compiled and made available to the individual faculty and the Department Head. Faculty members are encouraged to use this information as needed for the future. The Department head, other Health Science faculty, and the staff from the Center for Education Development are available to provide feedback to each faculty in the areas of course development and teaching improvements. Campus-wide semester long workshops such as "Peer-coaching" and other seminars and workshops on campus are also available for teaching improvements.

To date, evaluation of instruction by outside groups has been done in one course – HLS 499 (Problems in Health Education, the department’s Capstone course). This is done by using health educators and public health personnel from the community who serve as external evaluators on various student projects and assignments. Additionally, Field Experience Preceptors provide valuable insights into the quality of instructions by observing and documenting student preparation and working in their Field Experience sites.

d. Who reviews the evaluation and how is it used?

Following the conclusion of each semester, individual faculty as well as the Department Head review individual course evaluations. The information contained in the course evaluations is utilized in course modifications or in the development of new courses. This information is also used to direct the professional development activities for each faculty. These evaluations are also compiled annually by the faculty member and included in his/her performance evaluation each December. Evaluations (formal and informal) from advisory committee members, adjunct faculty, and others familiar with the program are shared in faculty meetings and appropriate consideration is given to them.

e. Have any evaluation studies been done on how other factors such as class size or teaching load related to the effectiveness of instruction? If so, explain.

Evaluation studies of this nature are anticipated for the future. Overall, the departmental faculty considers this a priority because the above factors along with class schedules, frequency of course offerings, and the classrooms selected are all factors that can be related to the efficiency and students’ perception of the quality of instruction.

f. How are instructors helped to improve their instructional effectiveness?

Faculty instructors may take advantage of a variety of options to improve their teaching effectiveness. A primary source of faculty support is the Center for Educational Development (CED). The Center provides a series of ‘Teaching Improvement Seminars’ that are open to all faculty. The topics range from improving large group lectures to critical questioning techniques. Other programs such as ‘Peer Coaching’ brings experienced and new faculty together in groups of 3-4 to sit in each others classes, provide feedback and ideas for improving/modifying teaching methods are also popular on campus. Drs. Velarde and Krishnan, two departmental faculty are currently participating in the program with Dr. Krishnan serving as one of the head coaches. Discussions in faculty meeting and consultations with individual faculty also help in improving instructions. Asking students in the classrooms or asking for their anonymous input are other methods for improving instructions. The CED is also equipped to videotape an individual faculty member teaching in a classroom and provide the faculty member with feedback. The highly qualified CED staff is able to provide feedback in a supportive and positive manner. The college Associate Dean whose tenure lies in the Department of Health Science has twice offered (through the CED) and conducted seminars for faculty on student centered problem-based learning. The SoAHEC has also offered a 3-day long training workshop on this topic to universities in the southwest.

g. Describe any research projects or other activities completed, underway, or projected in our program to improve the quality of teaching.

Each January two days are identified for faculty improvement. These are opportunities for faculty to gain new expertise in teaching, interact with faculty from other departments and exchange ideas. The Department is also engaged in the development/refinement of student-centered and problem-based learning with students from multiple disciplines.

Faculty receives credit on the Department's performance form for attending teaching improvement seminars and conference sessions designed to improve instruction. Similarly faculty is encouraged and credited for incorporating new instructional techniques, community based projects, and collaborative projects into their course content.

h. Is there any planned way of exchanging or putting into practice new ideas? Describe.

New ideas are discussed among faculty at departmental meetings whether they be specific to courses, Departmental, College or University wide concerns, research efforts or grant writing issues, and suggestions and input presented by students in the program. Besides, Department head meets with individual faculty to review their performances and provide feedback.

i. What procedures are used for resolving conflict and for handling resistance to change?

The department head and the faculty are sensitive to situations that might result in conflict. Proactive methods are utilized whenever possible. Active listening, the use of reason, and an appeal to academic collegiality are also used in an effort to shape the potential conflict into a problem-solving situation. Conflict resolution techniques are encouraged and used whether conflict exits between the Department head and faculty, faculty and faculty, faculty and staff, faculty and students or staff and students. Open communication is supported and valued. If these techniques are unsuccessful, other options such as use of the Counseling Center or a conference with the dean are available.

When there is resistance to change, techniques such as those described above are used to overcome this resistance. Additionally, techniques such as open discussions, limited group interactions, and outside assistance are also employed. Further, the concerns of those opposed to change are taken seriously and addressed on an individual basis.

j. How is the success of students evaluated?

Student success is evaluated by their perceptions of their educational success as well as by the perceptions of the graduate's employers as indicated by the measures listed below:

  • Satisfactory ratings from external reviewers who evaluate their work and assignments in HLS 499
  • Satisfactory ratings from field experience preceptors at the end of 320 hours of field experience
  • Students’ personal perceptions and thoughts about the preparation they received in the department expressed in their exist interviews
  • Number of students who take the CHES certification examination and their scores
  • Students’ placement in jobs after graduation and admissions into graduate studies
  • Students’ grades in individual courses and GPA at graduation
  • Pass rates on the CHES exam

Students success is also evaluated using Alumni surveys (Appendix D), job placements of graduates, and enrolling in graduate schools.

Finally, student success is evaluated by the pass rate of our students on the Certified Health Education Specialist Examination as provided by NCHEC (Appendix AD).

k. What is the voluntary dropout rate at various levels and what are the reasons?

One of the program effectiveness measures (Refer to Page 19) relates to student retention and conversely to dropout rates. Since 1995 when specific measures for student learning and program effectiveness were developed and adopted for the BCH program, overall dropout rates have progressively fallen. This drop may be attributed to the various changes (described on pages 23-24 instituted by the department to improve and maintain the quality of the program and institute admissions requirements that help select students who are committed to and interested in community health education and those who have the greatest potential of completing the program. When students have voluntarily dropped out of the program, it is to change their major, move into allied health fields (Respiratory Therapy or Physical Therapy) or into nursing, leave the geographic area, be offered a job, or for a personal reason. When it is because of non-voluntary reasons, it is often because of poor performance in the program and consequently inability to maintain the GPA and academic performance at the required level. The data on the overall dropout rates (voluntary and non-voluntary) of students admitted into the program indicate remarkable decline from a 45% dropout rate during the 1996-1997 academic year to a low of 18% reported in the department’s 1999 Outcomes Assessment Plan and Annual Review of Results. There is no reason for this trend of low dropout rates to continue into the future. This rate has not been stratified into the various levels at which the dropouts have occurred.

l. Under what circumstances are students dropped from the program?

Currently students are not dropped from the program though they may be dropped from the University for having a cumulative GPA below 2.0 at the end of their second academic year as described in the NMSU Undergraduate Catalog. The department attempts to work with those students whose academic performance is below par during advising to help raise their GPA and to avoid being dropped. Based on the outcomes of these advising attempts, recommendations may be made to the students to support their educational goals and help them in achieving them (such as limiting courses, utilizing the services of the Learning Center, changing to a major of interest etc.)

m. Describe any studies completed, underway, or planned to evaluate success of graduates in employment.

Informal discussions and formal survey of employers is periodically conducted to evaluate the quality of preparation students receive in the program and how well they meet the needs of employers and the changing demands of the profession. The department plans to conduct employer surveys more often and on a regular basis. Currently we are limited by the lack of a dedicated staff who could collect, compile, and report the effectiveness and success of the undergraduate program on the basis of employment of program graduates and all of the other measures listed previously (Pages 19-20). However, informal discussions clearly suggest that program graduates are well prepared for employment and to meet the new challenges of the profession. The department’s outcomes assessment reports further highlight some of the results that support the success and effectiveness of the program are (Appendix I).

n. Matrices I - VII contain competency and sub-competency check lists for the major areas of responsibility for health educators. (See pages 35-47). Fill out each matrix according to the instructions found on each and include in an appendix.

Appendix J includes the matrices documenting the competencies and sub-competencies covered in the core courses that are required to be taken by all students in the program.

The undergraduate program coordinator, department head, and the advising coordinator in the college dean's office are all involved in the process of data compilation to determine the program effectiveness and the level of student learning. The department's advisory committee (composed of people who work in the areas of public health and health education) also provides their input and suggestions for modifications and improvements in the program based on the annual outcomes assessment reports. The committee is also consulted at other times as and when necessary. Students' comments in exit interviews and from alumni surveys, ratings and comments on faculty and course evaluations (completed by students at the end of each semester), and evaluations from field experience preceptors/ supervisors all help to determine the effectiveness of the program. For example, in 1999, this information was used to learn how and what to modify and improve as indicated below.

 

3. PRACTICE TEACHING OR FIELD EXPERIENCES

a. Is a block field placement or practice teaching a part of the program? If so, provide the following information:

All students are required to take 6 credit hours (320 hours in total or 20 hours per week for 16 weeks) during the spring or fall semester. No student is exempt from this experience, which the Department considers an essential aspect of the program and of students' learning and understanding of working with diverse communities and in designing public health education and prevention programs that meet the needs of the target audience.

A representative list of field experience sites is included in Appendix L. As is evident from this list, these sites are diverse and include local, state, and national agencies, These agencies work on community, work-site, and environmental health issues to mention a few.

i. Is it required of all students? If not, which ones are exempt and why?

Yes, the field experience is required of all students majoring in community health.

ii. Describe the range of experiences and opportunities for observations and practice.

Experiences for field placements include traditional hospital setting and other healthcare facilities, state public health agency, non-profit community agencies, worksite or corporate settings, schools, grant sites and wellness center. As indicated by the list of sites, students have a variety of sites available to them. The department has a list and descriptions of the sites that have been used in the past to help them choose one that meets their interest and goals. Students can also suggest new sites to conduct their field experience. These sites may be located in New Mexico, other states, and occasional in other countries.

iii. How long is the total experience? (hours, weeks, or months?)

The total experience is 320 hours for 6 credit hours to be typically completed in the semester prior to graduation. Students are encouraged to enroll in their field experience courses after they have completed their core (required) courses and a large proportion of their electives. This, the department believes helps students to effectively integrate into practice the ideas and concepts they have learned in the classroom and take full advantage of their hands on field experience.

iv. How many hours per week are required?

Students spend twenty (20) hours per week for 16 weeks at the field experience site during the academic semester. There is flexibility built into the schedule that allows students to benefit from other educational opportunities that arise during the semester and extend their field experience into two semesters working 10 hours/week over the semesters.

v. How much academic credit is received by the student? How does credit for field experience or practice teaching relate to other academic credit?

Students receive six (6) hours of credit for the field experience. Field experience is a required component of the student's academic course load and regarded as essential and useful in providing students an opportunity to practice and see in action the concepts and content learned in the classroom. Students input about their field experience indicate that they all appreciate this hands-on experience and its relevance to finding a job after graduation.

vi. How are the student, the faculty, the university, and the internship agency prepared for the practicum?

  • The agencies are prepared for the student field by the student’s faculty advisor who works with both the student and the agency. There is regular communication between the agencies and the faculty members. Field experience preceptors are encouraged to attend the ‘end-of -the semester’ student presentations.

vii. Describe the process of site selection and student placement for practice teaching or field experience.

Students and their faculty advisors, work closely in choosing their field experience site (based on the student's interest, agency needs, and the availability of opportunities) well in advance of the semester they intend to enroll in their field experience. The field experience manual/handbook is available to all enrolled students and also available on the departmental web-site describes the requirements and other details. The manual/handbook also contains all the required forms and time-lines (a copy included with this self-study). Usually, the students attend an orientation session at the start of the semester that explains the field experience requirements and answers any questions that the students may have. The factors considered in the selection of a site include the student’s area of interest, goals and other factors such as transportation, availability of opportunities, needs of the agencies, and the availability of a CHES certified preceptor for supervision. One factor considered in the site selection is the availability of a health educator who could serve as a preceptor.

viii. Describe the supervision provided the student by the school/agency and by the university.

The faculty advisors maintain regular contact with their students and with the field experience preceptors/ supervisors on site to develop the goals and objectives of the field experience and ensure that they are being met and fulfilled. The faculty supervisor is also encouraged to visit their students' field experience sites twice during the semester. Faculty members are also available (by phone or in person) to resolve any concerns or issues that may arise during the experience. On-site supervision is provided by the field experience preceptors. The faculty and the site preceptors work together to help students benefit the most from their field experience. All students present their field experiences orally at an end of the semester event attended by all students enrolled in this experience, by faculty, and by some of the site preceptors/ supervisors. Students receive a grade from their faculty advisors for their field experience based on their work, the comments and evaluation of their preceptors/ supervisors, and the binders they submit that documents all their work, their completed forms, and their time-sheets. The students get an opportunity to evaluate their preceptor and field experience sites so that future students benefit from their experiences and comments. Student field experience binders are stored in the departmental conference room/library for review by faculty and other students and are reviewed by the Department Head and Undergraduate program Coordinator for program evaluation and for outcomes assessment purposes.

ix. How does the practice teaching or field experience relate to other courses and activities before and following practice teaching/field experience?

The field experience is one of the culminating courses of the program. It encompasses and integrates the content taught in previous health science courses as well as other university courses. It is viewed as an opportunity for students to incorporate theory, concepts, and content learned in courses and to understand the application of this knowledge into practice. It is designed to provide students valuable ‘job related’ experience. Hence students are encouraged to enroll in field experience after they have taken the core courses and a variety of electives. Its prerequisite is HLS 475 in which enrollment is restricted to BCH majors only.

x. Is the student required to report on the practicum? Describe the requirements.

Yes, students are required to report on the field experience. Specific requirements for field experience are identified in the course syllabi for HLS 496: Health Science Field Experience and in the field experience manual (Appendix K). Students enrolled in HLS 496 are required to provide an oral report at an event attended by their classmates, field experience preceptors, and faculty. Students also document and compile their goals and objectives, their work, their schedule, and their evaluations and other forms in a folder submitted to the department after their presentation. The department keeps these folders in its library for reference. Students are required to concurrently enroll in HLS 497, a one credit hour senior seminar in Community Health Education. This course meets weekly in the fall and spring semesters and allows students an opportunity to raise professional issues and concerns.

xi. How is the practicum evaluated? By whom? What is included in the evaluation process?

The field experience is evaluated by the student, the agency preceptor, and by the faculty member. The preceptor and faculty evaluate the abilities of students in achieving their stated goals and articulating their experience in their presentations. The students evaluate and rate their experience and the site in providing them a valuable and useful experience. The various evaluation forms and grading criteria are included in Appendix M.

xii. Has a practice teaching and/or field experience manual been prepared? If so, attach a copy of each. How is each used? By whom?

Yes, we have a field experience manual and a new field experience brochure (Appendix K) that document all the requirements and other details of the experience was developed collectively by the departmental faculty, a copy of which is enclosed with the self-study report.

Experiences for field placements include traditional hospital setting and other healthcare facilities, state public health agency, non-profit community agencies, worksite or corporate settings, schools, grant sites and wellness center. As indicated by the list of sites, students have a variety of sites available to them. These sites may be located in New Mexico, other states, and occasional in other countries. A list of these sites is included in Appendix L.

4. CURRICULUM

The following section addresses the three items included in the self-study. Course syllabi for all core/required and some elective courses are included in the self-study (Appendix N). These syllabi provide the names of the responsible faculty, course number, title, description, course objectives, assignments and requirements, and classroom policies and procedures.

a. On Form A, page 42, record all course requirements for the baccalaureate degree in health education; include academic foundation, professional education and internship.

All course requirements, including pre-requisites, professional education, and internship requirements are included in Appendix O. Students matriculating under the 2000-2001 undergraduate catalog are required to complete 41 credits in general education, 29 credit hours in community health education, 21 credits in the public health core, and 54 credits of electives.

b. On Form B, page 43, list all courses offered to the undergraduate student by the Health Education Program.

All courses offered by the program are listed in Appendix P.

Provide a binder which contains the following material for each course listed on Form B, page 43:
Course number, title, description
Course objectives
Course outline – include names of responsible faculty

Binder # 2 submitted with the self-study report includes course syllabi which documents the course numbers, titles, course goals and objectives, description of content, assignments, and deadlines, and the faculty responsible for each course. Readings (required and recommended) and tentative class schedules are also included in the course syllabi.

5. ENROLLMENT

a. On Form D, page 51, record the number of health education majors enrolled by class standing (e.g., freshmen, sophomores, etc.) during each of the past five year.

Refer to Appendix Q for the number of health education majors and other demographic and other data including the variables that contribute most significantly to the success of the program. The distribution of majors based on their class standing is also included in this Appendix Q.

b. Describe the student recruitment program.

The goal of the department includes being successful in recruiting majors into its Bachelor of Community Health (BCH) degree program. Recruitment is done through the efforts of the college advising coordinator, department head, and other faculty at events organized around the state for recruitment efforts, and through the department's participation at conferences and meetings. Besides these recruitment efforts, the department follows all inquiries by potential students with a letter and informational brochures and details. The AHCOP and Southern AHEC programs assist in the recruitment efforts by visiting high schools, encouraging students to consider careers in community health, and conduct campus tours for student groups. The local community college has been extremely helpful in providing a pool of potential students. The departmental web site contains information about the program and faculty and also includes the application forms. The departmental mission and a list of the various courses required and offered are listed in the university undergraduate catalog (Appendix R). The departmental course offerings during each semester of 1999 are included in Appendix S.

Specifically, student recruitment takes place in a variety of ways. High school students are invited to attend university orientation days at which the department is represented by Health Science faculty. Junior college students from the branch campuses are also invited to attend specific orientation days. Both of these opportunities are utilized to answer student questions and provide relevant literature. Faculty also participates in community education programs to present information about the educational options available to them. Potential students receive an informational letter, college brochure, departmental brochure, and degree plans. In addition, each year hundreds of students seek additional information about the program through the NMSU Admissions Office. The Department is prompt in responding to such requests by mailing out the Department brochure and degree information.

c. Is the curriculum listed prominently in the university/college catalog? Is health education easily identifiable as a career opportunity? Comment.

Yes, an introduction that includes details of the Department as well as its degree plans are presented in the section about the CHCS. A description of all current health science (HLS) courses is contained in the course description section of the undergraduate catalog (Appendix R).

d. Describe and evaluate the policies for the administration of admission to the program (e.g., university/college quota policies).

The Department supports the admission policy of the College and the University. The admission policy states that students may be accepted either as a regular student or as a non-degree student. Students enrolled in the Department are considered as regular students. Requirements for admission as a regular student include: 1) graduation from any state high school or academy in the United states accredited by a regional accrediting association or approved by a state department of education or state universities; 2) high school grade average of at least 2.0 and Enhanced ACT standard composite score of at least 21. In 1991 the following became the minimum requirements with respect to high school preparation: 1) English 4 units (must include at least 2 units of composition, one of which must be a junior or senior level course); 2) science - 2 units beyond general science; 3) Mathematics - 3 units (from algebra 1, algebra II, geometry, trigonometry, or advanced math); and foreign languages or fine arts 1 unit.

i. Where is this policy stated?

This policy is clearly stated in the New Mexico State University Undergraduate Catalog, p. 1(Appendix R).

ii. How was this policy determined?

The policy was determined as an outcome of a university-wide ‘student retention’ study. The study demonstrated that students who could meet the required GPA and accepted scores on tests for admission, were more likely of being successful in the University.

iii. Is this policy adequate to fulfill enrollment needs? If not, explain.

Yes, this policy is adequate.

iv. What changes are needed in this policy?

At this time, no changes are identified in this policy.

v. How can these changes be achieved?

N/A.

vi. What is the policy for change of major?

Students may change their major within the CHCS by indicating their decision by the second Friday in each semester. If the student is changing from another College into the CHCS this must be done at the time of registration for the upcoming semester.

vii. How are credits earned in other schools and other countries evaluated for admission to the university; to the program?

Students transferring into NMSU have previously earned course work evaluated during the initial application process. Courses that are evaluated as accepted at the university, are honored as accepted in the Department. However, it is possible that not all transfer credits may be used in a specific degree plan.

viii. What is the required grade point average? Are exceptions ever made? Explain.

The requirements for admittance into the BCH degree program have been streamlined and made more stringent as reported in the 1997 outcomes assessment report. These requirements are clearly included in the undergraduate catalog and in all the brochures and printed materials about the program. Since 1997, to be admitted into the BCH program a student needs to meet the following requirements.

• A GPA of at least 2.50 after completion of 23 credits of general education course work

• A grade of S in HLS 100 and a C or better grade in HLS 150

• A percentile score of 37% or more on the departmental writing assessment/assignment

Exceptions are made for those students who work as health educators or in public health, or have met all other requirements except one, or have a GPA or writing assessment slightly lower than that required.

ix. What is being done to recruit, plan for, retain, and place individuals who are socially, educationally, and/or economically underserved?

Students who may be socially, educationally and/or economically underserved are welcomed and integrated into the health science student body and program. Faculty facilitates the identification of students who may have unique learning needs and provide guidance as appropriate. The guidance provided by faculty, may include, among others, recommendations to use student support services on campus. Regular communication between students and their faculty advisors is encouraged to promote retention and successful progress towards educational goals.

NMSU is the only Carnegie Class I research/doctoral university listed as a minority university by the Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities (HACU). The CHCS has the largest minority enrollment of any college at the University. The Department submitted an Allied Health Careers Opportunities Program proposal to DHHS in the fall of 1989, which had as its goal the enhanced recruitment and retention of minorities into both community health education and medical technology, as well as for other allied health fields. The Department, in conjunction with SoAHEC and AHCOP continues to work in recruiting minority students and retaining them by providing support and a conducive learning environment

.x. For students whose English is a second language, how is competency in English evaluated?

Students for whom English is a second, are required to earn a score of 500 or better on the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL).

xi. Are students permitted to earn course credits by examination? Explain. Identify courses.

Yes, students enrolled at NMSU may participate in the Credit by College Level Examination (CLEP) program through which a student may earn as many as 30 semester credits. An enrolled student who has a

cumulative GPA of at least 2.0, and is currently attending courses, may, with the permission of the appropriate department, challenge by examination, any undergraduate course in which credit has not been

previously earned except as an independent study, research or reading course, or any foreign language course that precedes the final course in the lower-division sequence (NMSU Undergraduate Catalog 1991-1992, p. 12).

xii. Are former and current students active in recruitment and selection of new students? If so, explain their role.

Yes, both former and current students are active in the recruitment of new students. They are invited to attend recruitment/advising sessions with potential students and actively participate by representing the Department on panels. However, they are not directly involved in the selection of students.

e. What are the characteristics of students admitted to the program during the past three years, i.e., age, sex, GPA, geographic distribution, motivation for entrance?

During the initial years of the program, this data was not maintained due to a variety of reasons (lack of resources and staff). However some of this data has been collected since 1996-1997 academic year and is detailed below:

The average GPA of students entering the BCH program in 1998-99 was 3.069 as compared to 3.00 in 1997-98 and 2.872 in 1996-1997 and to an average GPA of 2.8 for the years between 1994-1996. These changes in admission requirements have helped us to recruit well-qualified students. Consequently the retention rates have been high. Graduation rates have consistently been high. A number of the graduates have found employment and/or moved on to graduate school here at the department and at other graduate schools. In 1997-1998 academic year the program had over a hundred students (Pre and Community Health majors). Of the 25 students applying to the BCH program during this period, 20 were admitted into the program. These students were recruited with the potential of completing the BCH degree, had a GPA of 2.5 or greater, had an average percentile score of 51 on the writing assessment, and had met the other admissions criteria (listed previously). Five students could not admitted because they did not meet the minimum requirements. Students are able to transfer some credits from other institutions by submitting formal requests which are reviewed by the college dean's office on a case by case basis. No substitutions are allowed for the core/required courses and need to be completed in the department. While in the program, students can petition for substituting one course with another one by providing reasons for such a substitution and after approval by the undergraduate program coordinator and the department head. Students in the program represent a large number of women and minorities (including Hispanics and Native Americans). The program also includes a number of non-traditional students who are older than the average undergraduate student and who work and attend classes at the university. Finally the student body is also diverse in age, socioeconomic status, and personal goals.

E. FINANCIAL RESOURCES FOR THE PROGRAM

1. Prepare a brief narrative of the program budget process with income and expenditures classified by major function.

The Department of Health Science has a faculty and classified personnel budget and receives an operating budget from the Dean's Office, College of Health and Social Services. The faculty salary funds come from state appropriations to the University's Instructional and General (I&G) funds, and from other salary sources such as grants and special projects. Adjunct faculty is also used for teaching, with funding provided either by "Weekend College" or through grant-related funds for the principal investigator's teaching buy-out. A separate budget category for "Classified Employees" covers the Department's one administrative secretary. Another budget category represents "Operating" funds for the Department. These funds cover student personnel, equipment, staff travel, supplies, phone, postage, and services.

2. What were the sources of special funds or grants obtained by the health education program during the past two years? How were these funds obtained and what was the purpose of the funding?

The Department of Health Science receives special funds and/or benefits through several federal and state-funded grant projects: a) Border Health Education Training Center (BHETC), b) Southern Area Health Education Center (SoAHEC), c) Kellogg GMNE, d) National Institute for Justice, e) Border Health Office. The funds for both the BHETC and SoAHEC were obtained from the Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. Both grants were written by faculty from the Department of Community, Family, and Emergency medicine at the University of New Mexico's School of Medicine with 75% of the funds flowing through to New Mexico State University. Program management responsibility for the SoAHEC was transferred to the Department of Health Science's department Head at the beginning of year 3 of its operation (October 1, 1990). BHETC started on the same date under the Department Head of Health Science.

The purposes of the New Mexico BHETC are: (1) to develop existing human resources in rural and border health, (2) to train health professional students in rural and border health, (3) to train health professionals (new and established) and the public in health promotional and health education appropriate to border and rural communities, and (4) to create opportunities for minority students to learn about and, ultimately enter health professions.

The primary purpose of the New Mexico SoAHEC is to recruit, assist in training, and retain health professionals in health manpower shortage areas. It assists with the recruitment of students for health careers and education of health professional students in rural areas of southern New Mexico by completing the Bachelor of Science in Nursing, through first and fourth year rural rotations for medical and allied health students, and through the development of a family practice residence program in Las Cruces. It also assists in the retention of health professionals by providing continuing education conferences and workshops.

3. Delineate the budget-making procedure from the program level to the university/college level. If the budget is accompanied by an educational plan, include a copy of the plan with this report.

The Academic Department Head keeps the CHSS Dean informed of the programmatic needs on a regular basis. The Department Head outlines the need for additional faculty based on student credit hour production and program offerings. The CHSS Dean then takes the recommendation forward to the Executive Vice President.

Concerning the Departmental operative budget, the Department Head determines program priorities with faculty input and allocates anticipated expenditures by category. The major departmental operating budget categories are: equipment, student personnel, phone, postage, printing, registration, repair, office supplies, and travel.

4. How is the budget controlled at the program level? How and by whom is the expenditure of funds determined?

All program-related expenditures are established and controlled by the Department Head. An annual determination is made as to the assignment of funds to each of the budget categories listed under Section E, item 3. Expenditures and current encumbrances are tracked on a monthly basis.

5. Who has the responsibility for purchasing, inventory control, supplies, and equipment?

Based upon faculty input, the Academic Department Head is responsible for purchasing equipment and supplies to maintain inventory control.

6. Are there policies and procedures for faculty, staff, and students to follow in requesting program funds? If these policies and procedures are in writing, include a copy with this report.

There is a written "Program Funding Request" used by the department's faculty, staff, and students to request monies (over $25.00) from the departmental operating budget (Refer to Appendix H for a copy of this form). This form is submitted to the Academic Department Head, well in advance (one month) of any anticipated fiscal need. In addition, faculty may also send a written request to the college Dean and the Department Head for additional funds by providing detailed justification for the funding. The Academic Department Head reviews the latest budget report and confers with the individual making the request if necessary prior to approving/disapproving the request.

The department’s budget includes spending for both the undergraduate and graduate programs. The budget for the past four years is included on the following page (page 36).

The BCH Program portion of the budget is difficult to estimate since the Department of Health Science operates with one budget for all academic programs (which are the graduate MPH program and the undergraduate BCH program). However, one reasonable estimate would be to split the budget as a percentage according to the number of FTE faculty assigned to teach in the undergraduate and graduate programs. There are 3.3 FTE faculty assigned to teach in the undergraduate program and 2.95 FTE faculty assigned to teach in the graduate program. The total is 6.25 FTE teaching faculty. Thus, the BCH Program percentage is 3.3/6.25 = 53%. Since this is only an estimate, it seems reasonable to consider that the departmental budget is equally split between the undergraduate and graduate programs.

     

    Departmental Budget

    INSTRUCTION AND GENERAL (I&G) BUDGET

    AY 2000

    AY 1999

    AY 1998

    AY 1997

    Administrative staff salaries (department head + secretary)

    $92,979

    87820

    87749

    87431

    Department administrative operating expenses

    $6,000

    4000

    4000

    0

    Department operating expenses

    $21,000

    20000

    20390

    22300

    Equipment (new)

    $5,000

    0

    0

    0

    Faculty salary (4.5 FTE in 1999)

    $210,368

    222915

    223669

    167366

    Graduate teaching assistants

    $20,900

    20000

    0

    0

    SUBTOTAL

    WEEKEND COLLEGE

    AY 2000

    AY 1999

    AY 1998

    AY 1997

    Part-time faculty salary to teach 4 courses per year

    $12,132

    13406

    15000

     

    SUBTOTAL

    $12,132

    13,406

    15,000

     

    CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION SALARY SAVINGS

    AY 2000

    AY 1999

    AY 1998

    AY 1997

    Part-time faculty salary to teach 8 general education courses per year

    $33,456

    48315

    49548

    8222

    SUBTOTAL

    $33,456

    48,315

    49,548

    8,222

    INDIRECT OVERHEAD RETURN

    AY 2000

    AY 1999

    AY 1998

    AY 1997

    Graduate research assistants (six part-time positions)

    $30,000

    10000

    14350

    0

    Photocopier

    $3,000

    3000

    1000

    500

    Faculty travel

    $4,000

    9000

    21000

    8000

    Office workstudy students

    $3,000

    5000

    1500

    3000

    Equipment

    $3,000

    5000

    0

    8000

    Misc.

    $3,000

    10000

    0

    500

    SUBTOTAL

     

    AY 2000

    AY 1999

    AY 1998

    AY 1997

    TOTAL BUDGET FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCE ACADEMIC PROGRAMS

    $447,835

    $458,456

    $438,206

    $305,319

    SERVICE (GRANT AND CONTRACT) PROGRAMS:

    The budget below is for the Southern Area Health Education Center (SoAHEC) and the Border Health Education and Training Center (BHETC), which fall under the administrative structure of the Department of Health Science. SoAHEC also includes a W.K. Kellogg grant for Graduate Medical and Nursing Education (GMNE) entitled "Community Partnerships in Graduate Medical and Nursing Education."

    STATE AHEC

    AY 2000

    AY 1999

    AY 1998

    AY 1997

    Personnel

    $45,454

    44570

    36731

    24176

    Program

    $20,717

    23860

    31456

    43066

    Staff travel

    $5,581

    5721

    4678

    5000

    Supplies

    $6,952

    5254

    6540

    10817

    Indirect costs

    $6,296

    6352

    6352

    6231

    SUBTOTAL

    FEDERAL AHEC

    AY 2000

    AY 1999

    AY 1998

    AY 1997

    Personnel

    $14,943

    22536

    18943

    3352

    Program

    $29,500

    27160

    8484

    22479

    Staff travel

    $3,673

    3073

    1260

    5829

    Supplies

    $3,243

    2512

    0

    8691

    Indirect costs

    $4,108

    4423

    2295

    2884

    SUBTOTAL

    BORDER HETC

    AY 2000

    AY 1999

    AY 1998

    AY 1997

    Personnel

    $26,325

    21834

    22820

    21430

    Program

    $28,907

    38833

    24699

    31652

    Staff travel

    $5,000

    339

    2551

    0

    Supplies

    $4,247

    3473

    5811

    0

    Indirect costs

    $5,158

    5158

    4256

    4247

    SUBTOTAL

    GMNE-KELLOG

    AY 2000

    AY 1999

    AY 1998

    AY 1997

    Personnel

    $90,859

    71065

    65835

    0

    Program

    $29000

    46400

    57000

    0

    Staff travel

    $10000

    7000

    7000

    0

    Supplies

    $11206

    16600

    12000

    0

    Indirect costs

    $0

    0

    0

    0

    SUBTOTAL

    $

    The following budget is for the Allied Health Career Opportunity Program (AHCOP), which falls under the administrative structure of the Department of Health Science (Dr. Delfi Mondragon, Principle Investigator):

    AHCOP

    AY 2000

    AY 1999

    AY 1998

    AY 1997

    Personnel

    $103,122

    95,784

    99,140

    93,578

    Program

    $62,555

    65,630

    59,100

    57,296

    Staff travel

    $1,000

    2,300

    2,500

    2,921

    Supplies

    $2,100

    3,000

    5,000

    3,500

    Indirect costs

    $13,502

    13,337

    13,259

    12,584

    SUBTOTAL

    The following budget is for the Border Health Office (BHO) grant, which falls under the administrative structure of the Department of Health Science (Dr. Stephen D. Arnold, Principle Investigator):

    BHO

    AY 2000

    AY 1999

    AY 1998

    AY 1997

    Personnel

    163,800

    160,635

    138,346

    59,845

    Program

    16,292

    15,977

    13,760

    5,952

    Staff travel

    9,000

    8,826

    7,601

    3,288

    Supplies

    13,500

    13,239

    11,402

    4,932

    Indirect costs

    16,133

    15,821

    13,626

    5,894

    SUBTOTAL

    $218,725

    214,500

    184,737

    79,913

    The following budget is for the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) grant, which falls under the administrative structure of the Department of Health Science (Dr. Satya Krishnan, Principle Investigator):

    NIJ

    AY 2000

    AY 1999

    AY 1998

    AY 1997

    Personnel

     

    na

    na

    na

    Program

     

    na

    na

    na

    Staff travel

     

    na

    na

    na

    Supplies

     

    na

    na

    na

    Indirect costs

     

    na

    na

    na

    SUBTOTAL

    $152,506

    na

    na

    na

     

    AY 2000

    AY 1999

    AY 1998

    AY 1997

    TOTAL BUDGET FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCE SERVICE (GRANT AND CONTRACT) PROGRAMS (AHEC, BHETC, GMNE, AHCOP, BHO, NIJ)

    $904,676

    $750,714

    $682,447

    $439,646

F. FACULTY

1. Describe the procedures for making teaching assignments, other assignments, and committee appointments.

Based upon the faculty's area of teaching expertise, prior teaching experience, and departmental needs, the Academic Department Head makes the final decisions about teaching assignments. Next, a draft version is circulated requesting faculty’s input regarding possible conflicts with research, committee, and service work. Whenever feasible, changes are made in the schedule to address these concerns.

Committee work and other assignments are discussed at departmental faculty meetings in which faculty express their interest and volunteer to be involved in committee work, service projects, and other assignments. Should an emergency require an immediate appointment of a faculty, the Department Head confers with the faculty who has the most relevant expertise and requests them to accept the assignment.

2. What roles do the Department Head and faculty play in determining program policies, procedures, schedules, activities, research, and service activities?

Faculty plays an active and integral role in the departmental activities. All members of the faculty (including the Department Head) participate in making decisions regarding the department, the programs, student-related issues, curriculum and policy changes. With respect to program policies and procedures, all faculty have an opportunity to provide input regarding them and making decisions that are beneficial for the department.

Schedules are developed based on student, professional, and educational needs. The Department head requests input from all faculty and integrates their ideas and input into the teaching schedule. The tentative schedule is reviewed by faculty prior to being listed in the university schedule and before letting students know about the course offering. A number of core course are offered on a regular basis to help students plan their study in a timely manner.

3. Complete a chart showing the qualifications of the currently employed faculty, including earned degrees, work experience, teaching experience, specialized training, age, length of service in the department, research, and professional activities. Indicate which faculty are tenured and which are full-time. For those who are part-time, indicate the amount of teaching time. Indicate which are certified (CHEC) by the National Commission on Health Education Credentialing. See Form D, page 52.

Please refer to Appendix T for a chart that documents the qualifications, work and teaching experience, specialized training, length of service in the department, research, service and professional activities of the full-time departmental faculty.

4. Complete a chart showing the faculty load for teaching, research, administration, and service responsibilities by terms for the past two years. See Form E, page. 53.

Please refer to Appendix U for a chart that compiles the teaching, research, service, and administrative responsibilities of the full-time departmental faculty.

5. What provisions are made for faculty to continue graduate study or to undertake research projects or consultantships for the past two years?

At the present time, there are no health science faculty pursuing continued graduate study. All full-time faculty members and a number of the part-time and adjunct faculty have a doctoral degree in their field of specialization. If a faculty member indicated a desire to pursue graduate education, this person could discuss with the Academic Department Head how she/he may achieve this goal within the needs of and commitment to the department. One of the employee benefits available for NMSU employees, is the opportunity to take 4 credit hours free of charge each semester. Faculty and staff may use this as an opportunity to continue their education or expand their qualifications. Consultation is defined for NMSU faculty as "services for compensation, not disbursed by the university, in an employee's area of specialization" (AP&P, p. 103). The policies and procedures require written notification for consulting and written permission from the Department Head. Departmental faculty has been involved in a number of consulting efforts.

Tenured and tenure track faculty is expected to have an ongoing research agenda. Faculty may request funds from the College Research Council for Research Projects. They may also request a single semester course reduction of 3 credits to allow greater time for work on a large-scale project. Those who meet eligibility requirements may also request a sabbatical of a semester's length with full pay, or a year's length with half-pay. Faculty can also apply and receive external funding from local, state, Federal sources for research and special projects.

6. Complete a chart to show faculty memberships in professional organizations, professional meetings attended, and in-service training experiences for the past two years. See Form F, page 54.

Faculty memberships in professional organizations, professional meetings and in-service training attended are included in Appendix V. Please also refer to individual faculty c.v.'s for all of the faculty memberships and training workshops attended by each of the departmental faculty.

7. Evaluate the training and competencies of the faculty in relation to the goals and objectives of the department.

Faculty education, training and competencies are all taken into account when there is a search for a new faculty member. A determination is made about the contributions a potential faculty would make to the of the program goals and to the teaching of students.

Tenure-track as well as tenured faculty are encouraged to attend professional meetings that enhance their current expertise or that allow them to develop new areas of interest and competence. Thus faculty continue their professional development that can assist in the Department achieving its goals and objectives and its commitment to students and learning.

8. Compare the rank and salary of the faculty with other positions requiring similar responsibilities in the college, in other agencies, and in other schools or

colleges.

Please refer to Appendix W for a list of faculty (fulltime, part-time, and adjunct) ranks and salaries in comparison to others in the college and the university.

9. Prepare a chart showing faculty turnover for the past ten years.

Refer to Appendix X.

10. List supporting personnel and describe their responsibilities. Indicate whether assigned full-time to the program or shared with other units (e.g., part-time faculty, faculty shared with other departments, adjunct faculty, clerical, library, laboratory, audio-visual).

The leading full-time support person in the department is the Administrative Secretary. The Administrative Secretary has, as a primary responsibility, the provision of direct administrative support to the Department Head. Other responsibilities include the daily managing of the departmental office and the supervision of one or more work-study students who work part-time (10-20 hours). Their primary responsibilities include answering the telephone, typing, assisting students and graduate/teaching assistants, and other responsibilities as assigned by the Administrative Secretary. The Department also has funding for hiring a Crimson Scholar to work directly with the Department Head for twenty hours per week.

Other sources of support comes from one College Assistant Professor (full-time and non-tenure track) who teaches four courses per semester, from part-time adjunct faculty who teach ‘viewing of the wider world’ courses that are open to students all across the campus and who may also be involved in providing administrative support, and two part-time college faculty, both physicians, who teach a couple of courses on Epidemiology, and Infectious and non infectious diseases.

Other support comes from advising coordinators in the dean’s office, from personnel at CED (on audio-visual equipment), from the ‘Computing and Networking’ group, from the library, especially from the assigned library liaison, and from the graduate and teaching assistants working in the department. The departmental personnel, their positions, and the nature of their work in the department are compiled and included in Appendix Y.

11. Describe office facilities for faculty. Are faculty office facilities adequate? Explain.

Currently office facilities are adequate. Full-time health science faculty are housed at the Academic Research Center, Building C in individual offices. The administrative staff also has individual offices. The adjunct and part-time faculty share office space and computers. The graduate/teaching assistants share office space and computers in the nearby Genesis Building where one of the two designated department’s classrooms is located. The department has dedicated and adequate conference and meeting rooms, an office dedicated to a copier, to other supplies, and to mail boxes.

12. What criteria are used for faculty evaluations? At what intervals are evaluations conducted? (Provide copies of current evaluation instruments for full-time faculty, for part-time faculty, for adjunct, for retention, for promotion, for tenure.)

Criteria for faculty evaluation are identified in the included evaluation forms (Appendix Z).

The faculty are evaluated on a yearly cycle and includes self-evaluation and an evaluation with the Department Head. The completed evaluation packet and supporting materials are then presented to the College and Graduate Deans who either concur or disagree with the Department Head's recommendations. Raises in salary, tenure, and promotion are based on these evaluations. Faculty are expected to perform and achieve their goals and objectives that were set in consultations with the Department Head at the start of the year.

13. Retention, Promotion, and Tenure

The Promotion and Tenure requirements can be found in Appendix AA. To retain faculty, the department and college provides them with the necessary equipment and help in the form of a graduate assistants and administrative and support staff help when requested and when available.

a. What is the role of the department/program head and faculty in recruitment and appointment?

The Department Head and faculty are directly involved in the recruitment of potential faculty. Following a search and interviewing process, recommendation(s) are made from the faculty to the Department Head. The Department Head forwards the recommendation(s) to the Dean of the CHCS. It is the Dean who makes the appointment recommendation(s) to the Executive Vice-President through Personnel. The Executive Vice-President makes the final decision.

b. Are there increased benefits or tangible values with retention, promotion, and tenure? Describe.

Retention of faculty is an acknowledgment that an individual is meeting his/her responsibilities in teaching, research, and service as part of the university community. Promotion in academic rank is a recognition by faculty and administration that a peer engaged in teaching, research and service that merits academic reward. Faculty members who are promoted receive a 6% salary raise the year their promotion takes affect, plus any performance related evaluation for that year. Tenure is granted upon demonstrated competence and fitness for membership into the collegiate community. Tenure achieves two goals: academic freedom and job security.

c. What effect does retention, promotion, and tenure have on salary increments?

Decisions of retention, promotion, and tenure have impact on faculty in terms of a salary increase determined each year. In the situation of promotion, there is a 6% salary increase from the average base rate of the higher rank.

d. Is meritorious performance recognized? How?

Meritorious performance is recognized by way of a salary increase through its ‘performance evaluation system.’ The University structure is such that 70% of "Base 10" calculation is identified for merit and with the remaining 30% being "cost of living". Such service is also recognized through awards granted on a yearly basis for teaching excellence, for research efforts, and community service on the university and college level and by the community at large. The awards handed out by the university and college include a citation and cash rewards up to $1500.00

15. What faculty competencies are available and used in the health education program from other departments in the school/college, from other units of the university/college, or from outside the university/college?

The Department is able to benefit from outside expertise. This includes the following:

  • Physicians who are invited to teach relevant courses by integrating their practice expertise
  • Qualified community members who are available to serve as adjunct/part-time faculty
  • Team-teaching opportunities among faculty in the college
  • Consultations with statistics faculty on analysis of data and other research related issues
  • Computer and technology help from the computing and networking group
  • Library personnel’s assistance with searches, ordering of relevant journals and books
  • Staff of health and social agencies who provide majors with opportunities for field experience, internships, and employment
  • Consulting and collaborative relationships with community agencies and foundations in the region
G. RESEARCH

1. What is the policy of the university/college concerning the division of responsibility for research and other activities for undergraduate faculty?

Research is an important component of every academic activity, and is, therefore, the source of content for quality instructional programs. It is the policy of New Mexico State University to recognize research as essential to the vitality of the university and to recognize the support of research as part of its institutional responsibility. It is also the policy of New Mexico State University to promote academic inquiry and to protect academic freedom for those engaged in it.

New Mexico State University is a Carnegie Research I University; it is also an authorized minority institution under Title III of the Higher Education Act. It coordinates its research functions through several entities: the Council of Research Centers, the University Research Council, the Committee for Human Subjects in Research, and each College's Research Unit. The specific functions of each of these entities are outlined in the University's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual.

The policy of the University/College is to encourage and support faculty research efforts by encouraging them to apply for external funding and for small research grants from their college. Each department supports faculty research efforts by providing some student and staff time. Research efforts and publications are acknowledged and recognized in faculty annual evaluations.

a. How much faculty time is allocated to research?

The normal faculty workload per semester is twelve (12) hours. Faculty engaged in research may request a 3-hour reduction in teaching workload. The decisions about teaching load reductions are made by the Academic Department Head. According to the departmental guidelines regarding performance evaluation, the typical recommended research-load for tenured and tenure-track faculty is 34%, or approximately 14 hours per week.

b. Is evidence of competency in research necessary for promotion?

Yes. Research is one of the three areas evaluated when a faculty member pursues promotion and tenure. The research completed or that in progress by the faculty member is reviewed by a departmental promotion and tenure committee followed by a recommendation of the Department Head and by the College promotion and tenure committee. The recommendation of each committee is forwarded to the Dean of the CHCS. It is the policy of the college to keep the promotion or tenure candidate informed about each step of the way at regular intervals. A faculty member may withdraw his/her packet from consideration at any time.

Faculty success in research and scholarly activities are evaluated both in terms of quantity and quality on an annual basis as part of their annual performance evaluation. These scholarly activities, in addition to adding to the content of a professor’s teaching, are evaluated by presentation and publication.

A number of students (undergraduate and graduate) have also been involved with the Southern Area Health Education Center (SoAHEC) which also includes the Border Health Education Training Center (BHETC), and a W.K. Kellogg grant for Graduate Medical and Nursing Education (GMNE) entitled "Community Partnerships in Graduate Medical and Nursing Education."

c. What sources of funds are available with the university/college for research?

Based upon the recommendations of the College's Research Council, which reviews the faculty -generated research proposals (submitted each fall), the Dean of CHCS makes mini-grants available to the faculty of the College on a yearly basis. Other funding comes from external sources and individual faculty generated funding. The purpose of the Health and Social Services Research Center is to provide assistance to the faculty of the College in the conduct of scientific research and professional training. The research center is administered under the Office of the Dean of the College of Health and Social Services, and includes a College of Health and Social Services Research Council composed of faculty representing the academic divisions within this college. Research mini-grants are funded, through recommendations from the research council, by the dean’s office. The research center provides information and support to faculty in the development of grant proposals. Faculty members who present research at meetings are usually funded for most travel expenses by the department and/or by the college.

MAJOR GRANTS AND CONTRACTS

AY 2000

AY 1999

AY 1998

       

STATE AHEC

$85,000

85757 85757

FEDERAL AHEC

$55,467 59704 30982

BORDER HETC

$69,637 69637 60137

GMNE-KELLOGG

$141,065

141065 141835

AHCOP

$182,279

$182,279

$182,279

BHO

$218,725

214,500

184,737

NIJ

$152,506

   

TOTAL OF MAJOR DEPARTMENT RESEARCH ACTIVITY

$904,679

$752,942 $685,727

The bulk of the department’s community research and service is coordinated through the Southern Area Education Center (SoAHEC) which also includes the Border Health Education Training center (BHETC), and a W.K. Kellogg grant for graduate medical and Nursing Education (GMNE) entitled "Community Partnerships in Graduate Medical and Nursing Education." The mission of the Southern Area Health Education Center (SoAHEC)/Border Health Education Training Center (BHETC) is to improve health care in all of the southern counties of New Mexico. As a regional resource center SoAHEC/BHETC provides the following services: a) provides learning opportunities for health care providers, b) assists in the development of placement sites for health professionals and students in training, c) links local educational and clinical resources with the educational resources of medical and health professional schools, and d) contributes funding, offers consultations, and assists in meeting educational and training needs of health care professionals, agencies, and organizations.

Housed in the newly renovated building on 1003 Geothermal Drive with the Southern Area Health Education Center, the Border Health Education Training Center (BHETC) actively works to recruit and retain providers to the rural and under-served areas along the U.S. - Mexico border area of New Mexico. BHETC supports travel and accommodations for medical residents and multidisciplinary teams of students interested in practicing in the area. Many of the family practice residents currently practicing in Doña Ana County have received BHETC assistance during their placement. Still other learners, such as the multidisciplinary teams of students from the University of New Mexico, receive funding to travel to various communities to explore and address community-identified health needs. BHETC also supports field trips for medical students to meet with practitioners along the border and to discuss practice considerations. It is anticipated that experience in this area of the state and familiarity with its unique needs and issues will encourage students from numerous health professions to consider practicing along the border upon graduation. BHETC also helps to develop and provide partial funding for continuing education opportunities for health professionals already practicing in rural and under-served areas of the state.

AHEC's 1999-2002 objectives are:

  1. Maintain and strengthen clinical training in New Mexico's Health Professional Shortage Areas for medical, nursing, public health, pharmacy, physician assistant, allied health, family practice, pediatrics, psychiatry, and strengthen and support interdisciplinary training in NM Health Professional Areas for dental hygiene, medical laboratory science, medicine, nursing, pharmacy physical therapy, occupational therapy, respiratory therapy, social work, speech therapy students and other health professionals.
  2. Continue AHEC's community-based health career awareness programs which promote health and increase the applicant pool from under-represented ethnic minorities and Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSA's) into the health professions.
  3. Expand, support, and conduct continuing education and training programs as appropriate, to promote the retention of health professionals in the AHEC counties in collaboration with the Continuing Medical Education Office at UNM and community organizations.
  4. Continue the AHEC strategic planning process for building regional primary care capacity.
  5. Strengthen and maintain the statewide AHEC system.

The Kellogg grant was received by the University of New Mexico Health Science Center (UNM HSC) and helped establish learning opportunities for graduate nursing and medical students in Santa Rosa, N.M. (120 miles east of Albuquerque), in the Southeast Heights of Albuquerque (high population of Vietnamese and Mexican immigrants), and in "the Southwest Quadrant" of NM, based at the SoAHEC at NMSU. Participation is expected from NMSU graduate nursing students (MSN students) and medical residents from UNM. In all cases, per the grant, the education is to be community-based and community-driven.

d. Are computer facilities available to faculty? If so, describe.

All full-time departmental faculty have their own personal computers (all Pentium or higher) and printers. Faculty may also avail themselves of the University Computer Center and its services. Costs are borne by the department/college/ university. There are also other campus-centers that house personal computers that can be used by both faculty and students.

2. For each study completed within the past three years or currently underway, provide the following information:

a. Title of study.
b. Source of funding.
c. Principal investigator.
d. Extent of student involvement.
e. How findings were shared.
f. Relationship of the study to educational goals of the program.

Refer to Appendix AB for information regarding items from a-f as well as a list of faculty’s scholarly activity since fall of 1996.

3. Describe any activities designed to develop research skills in students.

Students at the undergraduate level are invited and encouraged to participate in ongoing research being conducted by departmental faculty. Students also receive an introduction to research and research methods in HLS 472: Biometrics and Health Research. Students may also opt to do an independent research study, under faculty supervision, through HLS 490: Independent Study. In addition students are required to complete research and analyses based projects, write grant proposals submitted for funding, and conduct literature searches on specific topics in upper division courses. Undergraduate students get a chance to participate in university and college wide research symposiums. Students compete for participation by submitting an abstract under the guidance of their faculty sponsor and then prepare an oral or poster presentation of their research interest, if selected. Students can also choose to take additional courses in research methodology and statistics that are offered by other departments (Department of Counseling and Educational Psychology-CEP). Additionally, the Department has taken a lead in participating and promoting the ‘Student/Collegiate Health Promotion Project Assistance Grant’ from the Paso Del Norte Health Foundation to fund student initiated research and projects beginning in the fall of 2000.

H. LIBRARY FACILITIES

1. Describe the types of library materials and resources available to the health education program.

A general purpose of the library is to support instruction and research in the health sciences, primarily at the undergraduate level. Materials (books, journals, etc.) are primarily in English but can be obtained in other languages when requested. The Library holds relevant monographs, journals and other serials, indexes and abstracts, standard reference works, and selected proceedings of major national and international conferences. A comprehensive list of available journals (Public Health and Medical) is included below in Table A.

     

    TABLE A

    NMSU LIBRARY

    Health science and basic medical journals, March 2000

    This list includes only journals to which we have current active subscriptions. It includes health science and public health journals as well as some basic medical journals. It does not include all medical or nursing journals.

    Alcohol Health and Research World
    American Journal of Epidemiology
    American Journal of Health Behavior
    American Journal of Health Promotion: AJHP
    American Journal of Health Studies
    American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
    American Journal of Public Health
    Annual Review of Public Health
    Art of Health Promotion
    British Medical Bulletin
    Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Sante Publique
    Epidemiologic Reviews
    Epidemiology and Infection
    Epidemiology
    Family & Community Health
    Health & Social Work
    Healthcare Supervisor
    Health Education & Behavior
    Health Education Research
    Health Educator: Journal of Eta Sigma Gamma
    Health Services Research: HSR
    Health
    Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences
    International Journal of Health Services
    International Quarterly of Community Health Education
    JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association
    Journal of American College Health: J of ACH
    Journal of Community Health Nursing
    Journal of Experimental Medicine
    Journal of Health Education
    Journal of Infectious Diseases
    Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine
    Journal of Public Health Policy
    Journal of School Health
    Lancet
    Nation's Health
    New England Journal of Medicine
    Noticias-News: The Newsletter of the US-Mexico Border Health Association
    Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
    Public Health Nursing
    Public Health Reports
    Research in Nursing & Health
    Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
    Revista de Salud Fronteriza = Journal of Border Health
    Safety & Health: SH

    2. Do those library materials and resources include all types of material needed by health educators? Explain. Does the library provide adequate services available through other libraries and retrieval information services, (e.g., MEDLARS)?

    Current library materials and resources reflect the variety of materials needed by the health educators.

    Besides its own collection of journals and books, the library can provide books and copies of articles from journals it does not own through its Inter library loan network. The online catalog of books owned by the University of Texas at El Paso can also be accessed in the NMSU Library. Presently, NMSU faculty and graduate students have borrowing privileges at UTEP. The privilege as has been extended to undergraduates since the fall of 1992. Additionally, the library has access to secondary literature through numerous online databases, free or for a modest fee. The various databases available to faculty and studies are listed in Table B.

    TABLE B

    NMSU LIBRARY

    Computer search services for health science students and faculty, March 2000

    The following databases are available for searching by NMSU faculty and students. Most can be searched from any location via the Internet. Those with full-text of articles available have the notation (FT). For a full listing of all databases available, one can refer to the library web page at http://lib.nmsu.edu/article.html

    Child Abuse & Neglect: Abstracts of child abuse information from journals and reports

    CINAHL (Current Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature): Includes allied health, biomedical and consumer health journals, publications of the American Nursing Association, and the National League for Nursing

    ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center) : Largest education database in the world for research documents, journal articles, technical reports, program descriptions and evaluations, and curricular materials in the field of education.

    General Science Abstracts : Journals and magazines from the U.S. and Great Britain, covering such subjects as anthropology, astronomy, biology, computers, earth sciences, medicine and health, and much more. Includes articles, reviews, biographical sketches, and letters to the editor.

    Health Reference Center : Includes dictionary, reference texts and journal articles in health, medicine and nursing. (FT)

    MEDLINE : Provides access to 3,900 journals in all areas of medicine, including clinical medicine, experimental medicine, dentistry, nursing, health services administration, nutrition, and much more.

    ProQuest Direct : Full-text articles, abstracts and citations from several thousand academic journals, general periodicals, magazines and newspapers. (FT)

    PsycFirst : Contains citations and summaries of journal articles, chapters, books, technical reports, and dissertations in psychology and related disciplines; current three years only.

    PsycLit : Contains citations and summaries of journal articles, book chapters and book literature in psychology, as well as the psychological aspects of related disciplines. NOTE: This database is available to library users on campus only through the library's CD-ROM network.

    SciSearch (Science Citation Index) : Keyword and citation searching in the scientific literature; access to over 4 million records from the SciSearch® database .

    Social SciSearch (Social Science Citation Index) : An international, multidisciplinary index to the journal literature of the social sciences produced by the Institute for scientific information. Keyword and citation searches are available.

    Sports Discus : Abstracts to the scholarly literature in sports, physical education and sports medicine.

    3. What have been the budget allocations for program requests during the past three years?

    Financial support for the BCH degree program has been fairly stable over the past several years. Requests from faculty are individually considered and when appropriate funds are made available. Funding from grants may also be used for this purpose if budget allocations have been made and approved by the funding agency and the university.

    a. Are funds annually allocated for the library? Indicate expenditures specifically for health
    education in the past three years.

    No funds are allocated specifically to the library by the department. The library receives a budget from the University Administration and allocates funds for materials to support curriculum and research interests of all departments. The library liaison informs departmental faculty when funds are available or when special funding is available to recommend journals and books to be added their collection

    b. Who administers the distributions of the funds?

    The Head of Collection Management allocates the funds for book purchases. Journal and other serial expenditures must be paid prior to the fiscal year and on an on-going commitment. The library seeks input from various departments through the assigned faculty liaison.

    4. Does the library collection reflect and support the educational goals of the program?

    Yes, the library collection supports the educational goals of the program.

    a. List periodicals most useful to the health education program. Is the essential content areas represented by books available to the health education program?

    Please refer to Table A (pages 46-47) for the listings of the various periodicals useful for the program.

    b. Are an adequate number of copies of references available when the library reference is the primary source of information?

    The library often owns several books on one topic, available for checkout by students and faculty. Further, a professor who anticipates short-term high demand for a library book has the option of putting the book on reserve for the semester, limiting the check-out to two hours, overnight, or three days. The library buys only one copy of a reference book and their use is limited to the library.

    c. Are non-book materials, particularly those concerned with health and education programs, readily available? If not, what is needed?

    Periodicals, books, and government documents are readily available in the library. The library also holds audio-tapes and video-tapes that can be checked out to be used by faculty in their classrooms. Further, video-tapes are available through the campus Center for Educational Development for closed-circuit TV broadcast to classrooms.

    5. Are the services rendered by the library adequate as judged by the faculty and students?

    Yes, services described below.

    a. Describe the services of the library and materials resources beyond the usual listing and distributing of books and periodicals.

    Library services include the following:

    A Reference Desk staffed by professional librarians during the hours the library is open.

    Library orientation sessions are available for interested classes of students and faculty. The librarians are also willing to customize presentations to particular assignments or topic areas.

    Photocopy and microform copy machines are available.

    Specialized library research guides not only list available materials but also lead students through a step-by step process of research and searches in various fields.

    The library is a selected depository for U.S. government documents. A variety of documents are available to faculty and students for in library reference and checkout.

    Interlibrary borrowing is available to all students and faculty.

    The library "Passport" program allows NMSU students to have borrowing privileges in all academic libraries in New Mexico.

    Computer search services are available either as an online service for a fee, such as DIALOG and

    BRS After Dark, as well as free CD-ROM products, some of which index health science related materials. These are available all hours the library is open. The most useful CD-ROMS for health science students are PsychLIT, InfoTrac, ERIC (education) and GPO (government documents). Table B on pages 48-49 lists the various available databases.

    The library has an assigned librarian to the department, while departments assign faculty members as "library liaison." These two people communicate frequently and meet when necessary. Together they order new reference books with solicited input from their departmental colleagues. The librarian keeps the faculty informed of new resource through the library liaison and through e-mail.

    b. Are the hours of the library conducive to full utilization? Include a schedule of library hours.

    Yes. The library is opened during the following hours on a regular basis:

    Monday - Thursday 7:30am - Midnight
    Friday 7:30am - 7:00 pm
    Saturday  9:00am - 7:00 pm
    Sunday  Noon – Midnight

     

    6. Describe the adequacy of the library.

    a. Is there adequate seating and general physical comfort?

    The University Library currently houses collections in Branson Hall Library, the older library facility and in a second $13 million state-of-the-art library (The New Library). The New Library houses the social sciences, humanities, and education collections. Six hundred new seats are now available. Branson Hall Library continues to house the science, engineering and business collections. Students in the health science field consult both libraries because materials are found in both places. Branson Hall Library underwent an extensive renovation in 1993.

    b. Are the facilities easily accessible to students and faculty?

    Yes, both libraries are conveniently located and easily accessible to faculty and students.

    7. Does the program maintain a library separate from the main library? If so, explain.

    The department maintains a small collection of current health science journals and collection of journal donated by faculty members in the conference room.

I. STUDENT SERVICES PROGRAM

1. Orientation of Students

a. What is the nature and purpose of the orientation program of the college/university? Of the health education program?

The University conducts an orientation program for new students which provides the student with an overview of the University, informs them of their rights and responsibilities as a student, of available student services, and introduces them to the mechanics of planning a course schedule and registering. The department offers an introductory course, HLS 100: Orientation to Health Science for the purpose of familiarizing students of the major and its applications and scope. The purpose of this required course is to introduce students to the field of community health and health education, professional roles and responsibilities of community health educators, and the utility of the program and job opportunities. The students are also assigned a faculty advisor as soon as they are admitted into the major and encouraged to meet with the advisor to seek advice and plan their course of study.

b. What written materials are available to students which clearly delineate college/university requirements, program requirements, particularly those which require off-campus travel or living? Provide copies.

Yes, such materials are readily available to students. These include the following:

    • The university undergraduate catalog for general requirements, policies, and procedures
    • The semester schedule that provides all the health science courses being offered and a list of important dates such as spring break and final exam week
    • During the university-wide orientation, students receive detailed information about the City, renting and other details of living in Las Cruces, public transportation and campus travel, the various services (Student Health Center, the Counseling Center, the Activities Center etc.) dedicated to students, and special services dedicated to students with disabilities (sign interpreters, tutors etc.)
    • The department has a home page that lists courses, rotation of these courses, field experience requirements and sites, and other relevant information to pursue a degree in Community Health. In addition students can pick up brochures about the program from the departmental office
    • Written information on campus events, social life, elections of student body and senators, and other information that enhances student life are also available at the Corbett Center. In addition, students are informed through newsletters and the campus newspaper titled

‘Round Up’

    • Students in the program are also informed through e-mail and a department list-serve

c. What part do current or former students take in orientation of students?

Current majors in CHE are invited to meet with potential students throughout the summer and in the beginning of spring when there is orientation.

2. Campus Services to Students

a. Counseling, Guidance, and Placement

1. Describe the counseling and guidance program.

The University Counseling Center in Garcia Annex provides a variety of counseling services to students, including personal counseling, group counseling, outreach programming and consultation. Services are free to students. The Career lab provides career guidance and testing. Certified counselors and doctoral students in training from the CEP department are available to meet students. A Psychiatrist is also available for medications at the Student Health Center.

2. How are students assigned for counseling and guidance?

Students can be referred to the University Counseling Center for counseling or the Career Lab for career guidance by advisors in the Dean's office, by their faculty, or they may self-refer themselves.

3. What procedure is used to assist students in appraisal of their potential, diagnosis of needs, or referral for remedial services where needed?

Students may participate in the activities of the Career Center or the Self-Development Lab to become appraised of their career potential, or for assistance in identifying learning needs. Pre-major advisors in the Dean's office also assist in this effort. Following this process, students may utilize the educational services of the Center for Learning Assistance, seek tutors, and mentors.

4. What instruments or other written guides are used by students as a self-development inventory?

Students may complete such inventories as the Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory, the MMPI2, the Myers/Briggs Temperament Inventory or the Kuder.

a. How is the self-evaluated instrument used?

These instruments are used by students followed by interpretation being done by a member of the staff at the Counseling Center.

b. How often?

This decision is made upon the student's request at the Counseling or Career Center.

5. What group activities are provided outside the usual class requirements to insure an experience in human relations and practice in-group cooperation?

Information about social gathering, on campus events, social life, elections of student body and senators, and other information that enhances student life are also available at the Corbett Center. In addition, students are informed through newsletters and the campus newspaper titled ‘Round Up.’ Honor societies such as Eta Sigma Gamma and other organizations also include group interactions and social activities for students. Eta Sigma Gamma helps students develop leadership skills, work with communities on a variety of health and social issues, build synergistic and supportive relationships with their peers and faculty members, and put their classroom knowledge and understanding into practice by getting involved in community-wide public health and community health education projects. In addition, the department hosts a social at the end of each semester in honor of the graduating seniors.

7. What placement service is available to assist graduates in finding positions? What role does the department take in the placement of students?

The Department keeps students aware of career opportunities and organizations via the HLS list-serve, the Web Bulletin board, and the department bulletin board with available positions posted. Students are also kept informed of pertinent professional organizations via HLS classes, the department newsletter, the HLS list-serve, and faculty announcements. Individual faculty helps students with their resumes, serve as references, and inform them on job opportunities, as they become available. The campus based career and placement center also assists students in writing cover letters and resumes and provides list of appropriate job openings. Field experience preceptors and the members on the department advisory committee also help students in their search.

8. What placement service is available to assist graduates in finding positions? What role does the department take in the placement of students?

The NMSU Placement and Career Services assist students in filing resumes and locating possible jobs. The department also makes graduating students aware of potential positions and many times serves as a reference for the student. A departmental "Job Book" is also available to students and faculty alike, as are copies of NMSU career listings. Currently the department does not offer its own placement service.

b. Financial Aid to Students

1. What financial aid (scholarships, loans, etc.) is available other than for a general university/college student?

There are a limited number of scholarships available for those majoring in departments within CHSS such as the Lowery Davis scholarship, which rotates between the departments (every three years) and the branch campuses (every four years). The Department has a new scholarship titled ‘the Virginia and E.R. (Dutch) Roahe Memorial Scholarship Fund. The income from this fund will be used to award annual scholarships to students pursuing the BCH degree (three students were selected as the first recipients of this scholarship beginning in the fall of 2000). Minority fellowships, the McNair fellowships, and other merit based financial aid is also available. Students may also apply for need based federal and/or state financial aid.

2. How is the financial aid administered?

As indicated above (in item #1), a new Departmental scholarship titled ‘the Virginia and E.R. (Dutch) Roahe Memorial Scholarship Fund is available to qualified students. The income from this fund will be used to award annual scholarships to students pursuing the BCH degree (three students were selected as the first recipients of this scholarship beginning in the fall of 2000). Further, college scholarships are administrated through the Dean's Office of the CHCS. All other scholarships and financial aid are administered by the NMSU Financial Aid Office.

3. What financial assistance is available to specific socioeconomic, racial, or cultural persons?

The University administers an extensive program of grants, scholarships and loans. The awarding of grants and loans is based on need, while the awarding of scholarships is based mainly on academic ability and, in some cases, need. Assistance in the form of work is available through the College Work-Study program and the New Mexico Work-Study Program, and is based on financial need. All students who are eligible can be considered for these forms of assistance. Minority fellowships as scholarships to Hispanic and Native American students are also available

c. Health Services. Describe the health services available to students.

The University maintains a well-equipped and easily accessible student health clinic on campus. General outpatient healthcare is provided on a first-come-first-served, walk-in basis. The center is staffed by qualified physicians, nurse practitioners, and other health-care professionals. The Center is accredited by the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and is a member of the American College Health Association. All patient information is confidential and is maintained as such, in accordance with the law. Preventive services, health-related informational pamphlets and brochures, and testing such as HIV antibody testing are also available to students.

d. Social and Academic Activities

1. Describe any social or academic activities arranged specially for students in the program.

The Department is active in supporting the activities of Eta Sigma Gamma and sponsors a reception at the induction meeting and other gatherings (to honor the graduating seniors every semester).

2. Describe other services available to students in the program.

Students are eligible to participate in all the social activities made available through the Office of Student Organizations and Programs. Such social events are well publicized in the tri-weekly student paper, "The Roundup".

3. Alumni Affairs

a. Is there an annual or periodic alumni program or activity?

In the past these activities have not taken place. However, in the future it is anticipated that there will indeed be an activity for the alumni.

b. What continuing written contact is made with alumni?

At this time no continuing formal written contact is maintained with alumni except through occasional surveys which are part of the Department's evaluation system. However a number of students work in the southwest and keep in touch with one or more faculty while others are pursuing graduate school and keep the department posted on their progress. Contact with program alumni is also maintained through conferences and seminars. Some of the BCH graduates have come back to attend the MPH degree program offered by the department..

c. What continuing education is available to the alumni? How is it administered, planned, and financed?

The Department is a Multiple-Event Provider with the National Commission for Health Education Credentialing, Inc. In this capacity, the department provides CEUs for CHES as well as to alumni.

d. How are alumni evaluations of the program made? How are the suggestions evaluated and implemented?

In the spring of 1992 the Department completed an alumni survey which is presented under the section on student success. These data have been compiled and various recommendations discussed by the faculty, with some recommendations being implemented.

J. PHYSICAL PLANT

1. Provide a narrative describing program space utilization, including:

a. Describe the general condition of ventilation, sound, and adaptability for present and future use.

The Department faculty and support staff is housed at the Academic Research Center C and Genesis A. These two facilities are adequate in ventilation and sound. The Academic Research Center C houses the Health Science Department, faculty offices, and conference rooms. Genesis A houses the Graduate Assistants offices as well as one of the health science classroom (beginning in May 2000).

The health science classroom in Genesis A room 106D will comfortably hold 40 students with state of the art facilities that include an In Focus Power Point projector unit and Internet connection. Larger Department classes (over 40) are regularly held in other classrooms on campus, such as in Hardman Hall and Milton Hall. The classrooms in these buildings are large lecture rooms.

Efforts are currently underway for a building for the College of Health and Social Services, so that all the college, departments, and classrooms can be housed in one place. Through legislative appropriations and through a bond issue, the college hopes to add equal amount of funding to the $5-million dollars it will raise for the construction of the new building.

b. How adequate is storage?

Genesis A room 106D storage space is connected to the classroom. The storage space (room 106E) is carpeted and adequately lit and can be accessed with a key from the department. Additional storage space exists in the Departmental offices in Academic Research Center, Building C.

c. How adequate for meeting instructional needs are classrooms, seminar rooms, laboratories, or other special instructional space?

The Department of Health Science will move its main classroom from the Physical Education Activity Center to Genesis A in May 2000. This new classroom with feature "smart" computing equipment to greatly assist classroom learning activities. Seating capacity is for 40 students, with movable seating equipment. The Academic Research Center, Building C, includes two conference/seminar rooms. The larger conference room is routinely used for seminars and student presentations and is equipped with all the necessary presentation equipment. The smaller room is often used for faculty meetings. Both rooms are well furnished, carpeted, and are easily accessible to faculty and support staff.

d. How adequate are offices and other work-space in meeting faculty needs?

Currently all full-time faculty members have individual offices. Two part time faculty members share another office. The Administrative Secretary and the work-study have their own offices. One office is dedicated to the copier, mail boxes and provides space for commonly used equipment.

e. How accessible is the allocated space to students and faculty?

The faculty offices and classrooms are easily accessible to students, faculty and support staff. Common workspace, conference rooms are accessible to faculty and support staff between 8:00 am - 5:00 pm.

f. If additional space were available, how would it be used?

If additional space were available, it would be used for classrooms, as a computer room and as a student study area.

g. As the program changes or grows, what is the procedure for extending or modifying space allocations?

It is anticipated that the Departments of Health Science and Nursing in the CHCS will have a new building in five years. It is anticipated that approximately 8,100 square feet will be dedicated to the Department of Health Science. The departmental work-space and offices are maintained by the staff of the university physical plant.

2. Provide a narrative describing equipment available for use in the program, including:

All faculty members and support staff members have personal computers and printers in their offices. All faculty members also have access to laptop computers, while some have their personal laptop computers used for teaching and instruction. Besides these computers, Table C (below) lists the other equipment available to faculty and students for class presentations and seminars. The equipment is housed in a locked storage area in the department and classroom and readily accessible to faculty and students on request.

TABLE C - Partial Equipment List
Sony Color Television
VCRs
Combination TV/VCR
Slide Projector
Dukane Film Strip Viewer with tape player
In-Focus Projectors for Power Point presentations (3)
Overhead projectors
Copier machine
Scanner

The Department also maintains (in conjunction with the Nursing Department), a computer lab with 19 computers on the Computing and Networking Network. These computers are hooked to a large capacity laser printer. This lab is principally used for HLS 471(the department’s computer technology course) and in general by students from both departments. During other times of the day, all college students can use the computers to complete various assignments.

a. What is the condition of the equipment at the present time?

Some of the equipment is dated but still functional. However, a large portion of the equipment has been acquired in the last few years to meet growing needs of faculty and students.

b. How adequate is available equipment for meeting instructional needs?

The Department has made significant recent upgrades in computers and AV equipment for use by all faculty and students under faculty supervision. Faculty office computers have all been recently upgraded for RAM and ROM memory and computing capacities. Several laptop computers have been purchased for use by faculty for researching and teaching and are all Pentium or higher versions.

c. How accessible is the equipment to students and faculty?

Overall, the equipment is accessible to faculty and to students with faculty supervision.

d. Describe the adequacy of equipment maintenance.

The computers are maintained and updated periodically by Computing & Networking Services. Equipment in need of repair is returned to the manufacturer or replaced if necessary. The copier is serviced regularly under a service maintenance agreement. However, as the departmental operating budget is small, the department does not have service maintenance agreements for all equipment.

e. What is the procedure for securing needed equipment?

The above items are readily available to all faculty members. Faculty and students can request specific equipment from CED through a phone-call and by filling the necessary forms at least a week before its anticipated use. Equipment in the Department, can be accessed/checked out by contacting the Departmental Secretary ahead of time.

f. What instructional areas are limited as a result of needed equipment?

There is a need for more computers for HLS 471: Resources for Computer Applications in Health Education. Consequently, at times there are not enough computers for 18 students’ use. However the department has been fortunate to buy several laptop computers and is currently negotiating for more computers for the HLS 471 course.

3. Describe parking facilities for faculty and students.

Faculty and students alike are required to secure an appropriate parking sticker to allow parking on campus. Parking stickers may be obtained at the NMSU Parking Department located in the Genesis Center on Research Drive. Faculty has two price options for parking stickers, $60 or $30. The $60 sticker allows for intercampus parking while the $30 sticker is appropriate for outer lots. Students may purchase $20 parking stickers. There are parking lots allocated specifically for faculty and students. Overall, the campus provides 1,639 lots for faculty and staff. Directly outside of the Health Science Department is lot 77B. Lot 77B provides 62 spaces designated for faculty/staff. NMSU campus has an estimated minimum 6,000 parking spaces provided for students. On the side of the Health Science Department is lot 76 that has 62 spaces for student use, 3 disabled spaces, and 4 visitor spaces. Behind the Health Science Department is another parking lot – lot 97. Lot 97is unpaved and open to parking with all permits. There are an estimated 300 parking spaces in lot 97.