SELF-STUDY DOCUMENT FOR

ACCREDITATION REVIEW BY

SABPAC


NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY (NMSU)

Bachelor of Community Health

Department of Health Science
P.O. Box 30001, MSC 3HLS
Las Cruces, NM 88003-8001

Phone 505-646-4300
Fax 505-646-4343

Web site www.nmsu.edu/~hlthdpt

CONTACTS:

Satya P. Krishnan, Ph.D., CHES
Undergraduate Program Coordinator
Email
sakrishn@nmsu.edu

Stephen D. Arnold, Ph.D.
Academic Department Head
Email
sarnold@nmsu.edu

Printed on July 21, 2000

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A. PURPOSE

B. OVERVIEW

C. ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION 

D. EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM 

E. FINANCIAL RESOURCES FOR THE PROGRAM

F. FACULTY 

G. RESEARCH

H. LIBRARY FACILITIES

I. STUDENT SERVICES PROGRAM

J. PHYSICAL PLANT

APPENDICES:

A Organizational Charts
B Faculty Curriculum Vitae
C Course Evaluation Form
D Alumni Survey and Student Exit Evaluation Form
E Field Experience Evaluation Form
F Department Advisory Committee
G Independent Study Form
H Substitution and Waiver Form
I 1999 Outcomes assessment Report
J Horizontal Analysis Sheet and Matrices I-VII for Evaluation of Responsibilities and Competencies
K Field Experience Manual and Brochure
L Field Experience Sites
M Student Evaluation of Field Experience Agency Form
N Course Syllabi for Required Core Courses
O Advising Document and Degree Plan (Form A and B)
P 2000 Degree Check Sheet
Q Form C and Analysis of Writing Assessment Examination Success
R Recruitment Packet for Undergraduates
S Course Schedules, Change of Advisor Request Form, and Student Handbook
T Qualifications of Faculty (Form D)
U Faculty Responsibilities and Workload (Form E)
V Faculty Professional Development (Form F)
W Salary Comparisons
X Faculty Turnover
Y Department Personnel Positions and Nature of Work
Z Annual Performance Evaluation Forms
AA Promotion and Tenure Requirements
AB Faculty Scholarly Activities
AC Select Portions of the NMSU Bachelor of Community Health Program Web Pages
AD Student Pass Rates for CHES Examinations


  1. PURPOSE

1. Provide a brief description of the development of health education at your institution which will contain the following information:

a. A historical statement of how the current health education program evolved.

Initially, Health Science was a component of the Department of Health, Physical Education and Recreation in the College of Education at New Mexico State University. The creation of an autonomous Department of Health Science within the newly organized College of Health and Social Services (CHSS) received administrative approval and became effective on July 1, 1979. It was at this time that the department moved from the Activity Center to Breland Hall. The initial goals of the new department were to complete the reorganization process, determine educational priorities with regard to educational pursuits and curricular changes and/or additions.

b. The current purpose (mission) of the health education program.

The mission of the Department of Health Science (and the Bachelor of Community Health Program) is to

preserve and enhance the health of the public and prevent illness and injury through education, research and service programs. The departmental faculty is committed to actively participate in all of these processes.

c. The current goals and objectives of the health education program.

The overall goal of the program is to educate and train the enrolled students to become community health education specialists. Based on this overall goal, the current objectives of the program are to:

B. OVERVIEW

 

1. The relationship of the health education program with the university and with a school/college within the university.

The Department of Health Science is one of three academic departments within the College of Health and Social Services, one of six colleges within the University.

2. Identify and explain the major strengths of the health education program.

The major strengths of the health science program include the following:

1. The faculty and the expertise they contribute to the academic program. These areas of expertise include border health issues, community health education, health-related behavior change, problem-based learning, rehabilitation, hospice care, HIV/AIDS, epidemiology, reproductive health, contraceptive decision making and sexuality, domestic violence, health promotion, environmental health, occupational health, health administration and policy, vulnerable populations, managed care, and ethics.

2. Departmental faculty’s qualifications and commitment to students by providing them with academic excellence and advice.

3. A curriculum that is competency based and designed to provide "state of the art" content while remaining flexible to meet the ever changing educational and job market needs.

4. An Academic Department Head who is sensitive of the needs of the faculty, staff, and students and serves as an advocate for them with the College and University administration.

5. Students who are committed to completing the academic challenges offered by the undergraduate community health program.

6. New and improved facilities, state-of-the-class room, and advanced instructional technology

7. Faculty’s involvement in local, state, national, and international organizations, in professional health-related efforts, scholarly and research efforts, and in leadership roles in professional service

8. An individualized culminating field experience/internship placement in local, state, national, and international agencies that helps students to apply the content and theory learned in the classroom to practice

9. The existence of a variety of organizations (such as the Border Epidemiology & Environmental Health Center) to provide students valuable experience in Border and Rural Health issues

3. Identify the major needs of the health education program.

The Department anticipates the following immediate and long-term (five years) needs for the program. They are listed on the next page:

4. What changes in the health education program are anticipated for the next year? The next five years?

Changes in the next year include:

To continue current recruitment efforts but extend more targeted effort in retention. Retention will greatly improve through a newly instituted policy (June 2000) and its full and stringent enforcement. The policy requires students to complete all of the requirements and pre-requisites for enrolling in the core courses and be community health majors when enrolling in departmental courses that are 400 level. This will limit the enrollment to majors only, reduce class size, and help students receive the individual attention and supervision required in maintaining high retention rates. Due to the continued increase of student majors in community health, an increase in both the frequency and number of class sections is anticipated. Additionally, due to an increase in student demand for service courses (HLS 150: Personal Health and Wellness; HLS 286G: Wellness and Lifestyle Choices; HLS 300: Drugs and Behavior; HLS 301G: Human Sexuality; HLS 320: Human Stress Management; and HLS 380: Women's Health Issues), the department anticipates to request funds to increase the frequency and number of class sections.

Another very recent change, is the establishment of the BCH oversight committee described below. In the next year, the functions and the membership of this committee will be finalized to be able to provide valuable input into the evaluation and improvement of the BCH program. This input is critical in meeting the quality standards demanded by the accrediting body and in addressing the changing demands of the profession, the border region, and the students.

BCH OVERSITE COMMITTEE STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION

  1. PURPOSE
  2. The purpose of this oversight committee is to develop and periodically evaluate the BCH program. This committee is also responsible for BCH admission decisions; curriculum review; development and revision of mission, goals and objectives; program evaluation; program planning; strategic planning; and other issues that affect the BCH program. In addition, this committee is responsible for assuring the relevance of the BCH curriculum, the quality of instruction, the suitability and recruitment of students, and the adequacy of resources.

  3. STRUCTURE
  4. Committee Chair: BCH Program Coordinator

    Committee Members: Two BCH program faculty, a Pre-BCH advisor from the Dean’s office, one alumni representative, one BCH student representative, and one community representative.

    Ad Hoc Members: Department of Health Science Curriculum Committee Chair and Academic Department Head

  5. INITIAL CHARGE
  1. Establish a formal mechanism to track and obtain feedback from BCH students, alumni and community members.
  2. Ensure that the BCH program maintains an identity that is separate and distinct from the other programs in the department.
  3. Develop criteria by which the committee can determine if the BCH program is fulfilling its mission statement.
  4. Ensure that BCH students have a role in the decision-making that affects their program
  5. Develop a formalized system of curriculum and individual syllabus review, which also takes into consideration evaluation from students, alumni and preceptors. Ensure that the curriculum provides a balance between public health, community health education, and management and administration of health education programs. Ensure that any overlap among core BCH courses is essential, not redundant.
  6. Ensure that program and course learning objectives provide appropriate emphasis to community health education preparation, and not just to general public health.
  7. Ensure that exit interviews are completed with those who leave the program (either by graduation or other).
  8. Maintain a detailed record of those students who apply, enter, and exit the program.
  9. Continue recruitment efforts to ensure a student enrollment that continues to represent the racial and ethnic diversity of the Southwest, particularly Hispanic and Native Americans.
  10. Ensure that BCH Program web pages are expanded to include information specific to the BCH program that describes its policies and procedures, opportunities for participation in governance, availability of computers and other resources, internship sites and requirements, and information about the ESG student association

Changes in the next five years include:

In the next five years, besides implementing the changes listed in the previous page and fulfilling some of the needs previously listed, it is anticipated that the department will complete the development and implementation of a self-sufficient continuing education program. Other anticipated changes include hiring CHES certified or qualified faculty to teach core and elective BCH courses. Another change includes instituting a mechanism and process that promotes and rewards students for research projects based in underserved local communities. Discussions for such a mechanism and process are in progress and it is anticipated that the department will have such a mechanism in place in the next couple of years. Finally, another anticipated change includes increasing the visibility of Eta Sigma Gamma and promoting increased involvement of students in the honor society’s activities and in other alumni initiated activities on and off campus.

C. ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION

1. What is the official name of the department and, if appropriate, of the health education program? Does the name reflect the scope and state purpose? Comment.

The official name is the Department of Health Science. This name reflects the scope and purpose of the Department, which offers the Bachelor of Community Health, Bachelor of Science in Environmental and Occupational Health (new degree program to begin in Fall 2000), and a Master of Public Health (MPH) in Community Health Education.

2. Prepare a chart showing the locations and administrative structure of the health education program within the university administrative structure.

The organizational chart that shows the locations and administrative structure of the health education program within the larger University administrative structure is included in Appendix A.

a. Does the location of the health education program provide maximum opportunity for meeting its educational goals? Why or why not?

Yes, it does. The location of the health science program within the CHSS allows for its visibility and quality assurance that help recruit students from within the state and from across the country. The Dean of CHSS supports the efforts of the Department in a variety of ways. In addition, the department (through the efforts of the faculty and the Associate Dean) are involved in developing and maintaining mutually supportive and collaborative relations with various agencies, professional organizations, and other programs across the nation. The Associate Dean serves on the SABPAC, the SOPHE professional preparation committee, and is a SOPHE anchor to the University.

b. Describe how decisions are made for the health education program in the following areas:

i. Academic Affairs (curriculum, admissions, library facilities).

Curricula decisions are within the purview of the faculty. This responsibility is taken seriously and curricular evaluation is an ongoing process to produce a high quality, responsive, and flexible curriculum. The faculty assumes the responsibility for maintaining a curriculum that has a solid knowledge base, reflects the educational needs of the students, and meets the commitment of and competency required of the profession.

Admissions criteria identified by the University and the CHSS have been made more stringent to attract high quality and motivated students to the Department of Health Science. Decisions about admissions are made by the Department Head and the Undergraduate Program Coordinator. All students admitted into the degree program are required to meet the department’s admissions requirements (discussed later in this report).

Library facilities are utilized by faculty, staff, and students from the Department. Decision regarding books, periodicals, and other library services are coordinated by the department’s library liaison with input from the departmental faculty and communicated to all by e-mail.

ii. Student affairs (counseling, advisement, student health services, student government).

A comprehensive list of campus based available student affairs/services are included below. Input related to decisions in these areas may occur in a variety of ways, such as directly to/from the Department Head; through faculty involvement on College and University committees; and through direct student input and participation on committees. Students from the Department are encouraged to participate in student government and have served as elected student representatives.

Student services include the following:

In addition, the departmental faculty serves on the following university committees related to student affairs:

    1. Alcohol and Drug Abuse Committee
    2. Sexual Misconduct Task Force, and
    3. Wellness Committee.

iii. Financing and business management (plant operations, non-academic personnel administration, student aid, etc.).

The Department Head represents the department in decisions relating to financing and business management by providing input and considerations to the Dean of CHSS in accordance to existing NMSU policies and procedures. The Department Head serves as a liaison and communicates decisions regarding finances, funding, and business management to the department faculty and staff. Additionally, the Department Head communicates directly with the Personnel (Human Resources) department on issues related to all staff (classified, professional, and faculty).

iv. Public relations and development activities (alumni office, news bureau, research & development, community affairs).

Input in these areas is provided via individual faculty interactions within and among the groups listed above. Faculty members are accessible and often serve to initiate and provide support in these areas. Recommendations for public relations and developmental efforts are approved by the Department Head and College Dean. The Department is represented by the college Associate Dean and advising staff at various fall receptions and spring honors nights throughout the state to promote the college’s programs including the community health degree and to recruit eligible and interested students. The Department, through the college Associate Dean, is also actively involved in the planning of the first institution-wide capital campaign.

3. Describe the functions, responsibilities, and activities of the health education program Director. (Include an official university statement, if available.)

The Undergraduate Program Coordinator directs the Bachelor of Community Health Program (BCH) and reports directly to the Academic Department Head. The program coordinator has a doctorate in community health education and CHES certification, requirements for this position. The duties and responsibilities of the Undergraduate Program Coordinator are listed on next page:

The Academic Department Head serves as the administrative leader of the Department. It is this person's responsibility to provide guidance, direction, and vision for the Department. This Department Head also serves as the liaison/advocate between the faculty and the Dean of CHSS and provides a direct line of communication between them. In addition, the Department Head serves in the role of mentor/evaluator for both faculty and staff. Finally, in general the head serves as a supportive advocate and advisor to the undergraduate and graduate students, resolving conflicts and addressing evolving issues.

4. Describe the administrative and organizational functions, responsibilities, and activities of the program faculty.

Faculty members participate in decisions regarding appropriate administrative and organizational functions. For example, faculty members are elected to serve on various departmental, college, and university committees. They are expected to comply with departmental, college, and university administrative policies and rules such as submitting grades before the assigned deadline each semester. All faculty provide student advisement and concentrate most of their effort on teaching, research/scholarly activities, service areas as listed in the departmental and college guidelines for performance evaluations, and assigned administrative duties.

5. List the committees on which the health education faculty serves. Briefly state the purpose of each committee. List the name of the health education faculty members currently serving on each committee.

The departmental faculty serves on various departmental, college, and university committees that are listed on the following pages (7-11). A brief description of the committees is also included in these pages of the self-study document. Besides graduate and undergraduate student advisement, faculty members serve on a variety of committees.

DEPARTMENT COMMITTEES (Department of Health Science – Academic Year 2000-01)

COMMITTEE

CHAIR

OTHER MEMBERS

CHES Continuing Education Review

Cardenas

Krishnan, Brandon + other CHES certified individuals

Degree Program - BCH Oversight Committee

BCH Program Coordinator

Velarde, Cardenas, alumni rep, student rep, community rep, curriculum committee chair, academic department head

Degree Program - BCH Undergraduate Coordinator

Krishnan

 

Degree Program - EOH Undergraduate Coordinator

Arnold

 

Degree Program - MPH Graduate Coordinator

Arnold

 

Degree Program - MPH Oversight Committee

MPH Program Coordinator

Krishnan, Velarde, alumni rep, student rep, community rep, curriculum committee chair, academic department head

Department - Curriculum Committee

Mondragon

All full-time faculty

Department - External Advisory Committee

Academic Department Head

(see list attached)

Department - Library Liaison

Mondragon

All full-time faculty

Department - Outcomes Assessment Coordinator

Krishnan

All full-time faculty

Department - Promotion And Tenure

Mondragon

Two other tenured faculty member in the department and/or college

Department - Web Page Updates

Arnold

All full-time faculty

Student - Eta Sigma Gamma Faculty Advisor

Krishnan

 

Student - Field Experience Supervision

 

All full-time faculty

Student - MPH Organization Faculty Advisor

Krishnan

 

Department faculty are also elected or appointed to college committees including:

COLLEGE COMMITTEES

Admissions Appeals Committee

Buckingham, + other faculty members in the college

Appeals Committee

Krishnan + other faculty members in the college

Curriculum Committee

Mondragon + other faculty members in the college

Interdisciplinary Education Committee

Mondragon + other faculty members in the college

Promotion & Tenure

Buckingham + other faculty members in the college

Research Council

Krishnan + other faculty members in the college

Strategic Planning Committee

Arnold, Meister, Krishnan + other faculty members in the college

Department faculty are also elected or appointed to university committees including:

UNIVERSITY COMMITTEES

Athletic Council

Buckingham + other university faculty

Faculty Senate

Krishnan, Mondragon + other university faculty

Faculty Senate Committee On Committees

Mondragon + other university faculty

Faculty Senate Library Committee

Krishnan + other university faculty

General Education Assessment

Arnold + other university faculty

University Research Council

Krishnan + other university faculty

Visiting Professor Selection Committee

Buckingham + other university faculty

DESCRIPTION OF COMMITTEES

CHES CONTINUING EDUCATION REVIEW COMMITTEE: Members of the Certified Health Education Specialist Event Approval Committee are responsible for reviewing applications from continuing education event providers and making recommendations for approval. Meetings of the Committee take place on a periodic and on an as-needed basis.

COLLEGE APPEALS COMMITTEE: Serve as the departmental representative on the committee, which process student appeals.

COLLEGE RESEARCH COUNCIL: Serves as departmental representative to read and advise on small grant proposals for funding, organize two events per year on research issues for the college, serve in an advisory capacity to the dean on research issues and needs of the college.

COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES: A Faculty Senate Committee consisting of Senior Senators. Appoints other senators to specific committees.

CURRICULUM: (College) Meets annually under the direction and supervision of the college dean. Other members are from Nursing and Social Work. Considers, discusses questions and recommendations, reviews proposed changes to curriculum, then makes recommendations to the chair.

CURRICULUM: (Department) Considers, discusses questions and recommendations, reviews proposed changes to curriculum, then makes recommendations to the chair.

DEPARTMENT WEB PAGE UPDATE: Design, modify, update and expand departmental web pages.

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEGREE DEVELOPMENT: Develop curriculum and full proposal to create a new undergraduate degree program in environmental health at NMSU.

ETA FACULTY ADVISOR: Serve in an advisory capacity, guiding and helping the group to achieve their goal and vision, attend some of their events, assist officers when requested.

FACULTY SENATE LIBRARY COMMITTEE: (a) Actively monitor university-wide faculty concerns about university library resources, policy and services, (b) work with the dean of the library in developing library policies which meet the needs of faculty, staff and students, (c) advise and consult with the university administration about: (1) the state of the library: resources, services and policy, and (2) the university commitment necessary to assure that the library adequately serves the teaching, research and public service missions of the university.

GRADUATE PROGRAM COORDINATOR: Maintain enrollment and admissions statistics, coordinate faculty review of all completed student admission applications, assign faculty advisors to newly admitted students, meet with prospective students, coordinate mailing of information and application packets to prospective students.

INTERDISCIPLINARY EDUCATION COMMITTEE: reviews issues that affect the entire college, i.e., College Curriculum.

LIBRARY LIAISON: Work with the library to identify and order new books and journals needed by the department.

MPH ADMISSIONS: Review applications, meet to discuss new graduate student admissions, develop criteria and scoring for admission of incoming students.

OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT COORDINATOR: Develop assessments for classes for faculty use at the mid-point and end of a semester, collect data that may be relevant for outcomes measurement for the department, author the annual "Outcomes Assessment" report.

PROMOTION AND TENURE: Conduct reviews of the qualifications of each candidate for promotion and tenure. Reviews each faculty member's "Annual Performance Evaluation" each year. This committee is advisory to the academic department head and recommendations based upon the findings of the reviews are submitted in writing.

UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM COORDINATOR: Meets with pre-BCH or other interested students, processes admissions of students twice per year, coordinates field experience orientation and final presentations, develops tracking forms that can help in tracking decisions about student admissions. The Coordinator reports directly to the Department Head. Specifically, the duties and the responsibilities of the undergraduate program coordinator are listed below:

UNIVERSITY SENATE: Meets regularly, discusses new legislation and policy and brings them to a vote.

6. What provisions are made to develop and maintain a high level of communication between the health education faculty and all other levels of the university?

Communications between the Department faculty and personnel in other levels of the College and University are maintained in a variety of ways. Each semester, all faculty are invited by the President to attend a university-wide formal meeting, which provides for an opportunity to become informed about the current state of the University. As the beginning of each fall semester the Dean of the College holds a College faculty meeting which helps the faculty to learn about the activities of CHSS. Additionally, there are written communications (memos and e-mail) as well as departmental and university newsletters to communicate relevant information. Further, departmental faculty serving on college and university committees has the opportunity to report back to the faculty during departmental faculty meetings. The College Dean convenes regular meetings of the College department heads every four to six weeks during the spring and fall semesters. Information from these meetings related to university and college-wide matters is relayed back to the departmental faculty at weekly meetings.

7. What provisions are made within the department to plan and coordinate programs and curricula (including resources) with other departments in the school and in the university?

The Department continues to be open to exploring opportunities to collaborate both within and outside of the CHSS and within and outside of the University. The college has formed a new interdisciplinary education committee chaired by the Associate Dean that is reviewing ways of increasing the sharing of courses and other ways of academic collaborations and recourses sharing within the college and with other colleges. A focus on US-Mexico border health and on gerontological health puts the Department of Health Science at the forefront of these efforts as it exclusively offers courses in each topic area. On a related front, a new grant from the Paso Del Norte Health Foundation will support student-initiated undergraduate and graduate research projects in health education, health promotion, and public health relevant to the border communities. Success of this initiative will be documented based on the number of majors from other departments and colleges are involved in these funded research efforts. Thus, this funding requires that the department and its faculty to raise awareness about health education and health promotion and their role in maintaining and improving the public health of the border communities. It will also require marketing this funded initiative and its mandate across the entire campus and to all the departments. The Department also coordinates the teaching of HLS/PE 286G and HLS/PE 320 courses with the Department of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance (PERD) in the College of Education. Both Health Science and PERD faculty team-teach HLS 286G. The course HLS 380G (Women’s Health Issues) is cross-listed by the departments of Health Science and Women’s Studies.

In addition, the Department coordinates the provision of professional and continuing education credits (CHES) for a variety of health-related events and professionals through the New Mexico. In addition, the department, with the collaboration of Southern Area Health Education Center (SoAHEC) and the New Mexico Border Health Education Training Center (BHETC), provides professional and continuing educational programs. Both Centers are discussed under section E-2 of the self-study. The Department also operates the Border Epidemiology and Environmental Health Center (BEC), collaboratively with the Border Health office of the NM Department of Health. The Border Epidemiology and Environmental Health Center (BEC) invites and promotes interdisciplinary research, education, and service through its REACH (research, education, and community health) strategies and efforts.

8. What administrative provisions are made for the faculty to participate in service programs in the college, university, community, region, and nation?

Consistent with the purposes of a land-grant institution, NMSU has a major emphasis on university-based and community service. At the Department level, performance evaluations document the percentage of effort each faculty devotes to service (ranging between 10%-15%) along with effort to teaching and research. Departmental support exists in terms of considering requests for consultation, granting time away from teaching responsibilities for community service, and for allocating specific dollars to support local and out-of-state travel. The Department encourages its faculty to participate as officers of professional organizations and to accept committee work. In addition, the university also encourages international consultation and exchange among its faculty. International travel is coordinated through the office of the Vice President for International Programs. The BEC (referred to in item #7 above), SoAHEC, and BHETC are actively involved in providing opportunities to promote community level service among university students and faculty. One example is SoAHEC’s Kellogg Graduate Nursing and Medical Education Initiative that allows for the university faculty and students to work in underserved local communities such as Chaparrel and Lordsburg to help them empower themselves, identify their own social and health needs, priorities, and possible solutions that highlight the communities’ own strengths and seek and raise funds for the various efforts. This initiative aims to help individuals and communities find long-term solutions to health concerns by addressing not just access and availability issues but the root causes to health disparities such as poverty. In summary this initiative aims to help individuals and communities build their capacities so that they are proactive in decision-making regarding their health and wellbeing.

9. What services have the health education faculty provided during the past two years to the institution, constituencies both on and off campus, and to the profession?

In the past two years, the departmental faculty members continue their service to the university by serving on several committees at both the College and University level. In addition, faculty is involved in service efforts in the community (for example, involvement with Habitat for Humanity and other community agencies). The departmental faculty is also involved in service to the profession by serving on the editorial boards of journals, reviewing of grants etc. Refer to faculty curriculum vitae for a complete listing of their service to the university, the profession, and to the community (Appendix B).

10. What plans have been projected for changes and developments in the organization and administration of the health education program for the next five year period? (Exclude plans for curriculum development.)

Currently the following are the projected plans for changes and developments in the organization and administration of the health education program are:

A more equitable provision of recognition within the department in terms of a course reduction and/or additional compensation

11. What provisions have been made for continuous study and evaluation of the organization and administration of the health education program?

The Department has developed an evaluation model that includes distributing evaluation questionnaires to current students, graduates, and potential and current employers. Students evaluate the faculty’s teaching and courses at the end of each semester using a standardized survey (Appendix C). Additionally the faculty participates in a yearly review of the department's organization and administration to determine if and when changes need to occur. Finally, faculty also participates in long-range planning, communicate, and discuss various program-related concerns in regularly scheduled faculty meetings. Department Heads are in turn, evaluated according to the policies and procedures described in the NMSU Administration, Policies, and Procedures manual at the end of their second year of service and every three years thereafter. All faculty and departmental staff (including department heads) are evaluated annually as part of the NMSU Performance Evaluation System. Additional evaluation data comes from the annual Outcomes Assessment Report (Appendix I), from the student exit interview (Appendix D), and from field experience evaluations (Appendices M and E).

12. What effort has been made to determine the image of the health education programs viewed by the following:

a. Alumni:

Alumni surveys have been used to solicit important and helpful information from program alumni about the quality and utility of the BCH program, their current job status, plans for further education or job changes. The most recent survey was completed in the spring of 1999. A copy of the Alumni survey is included in Appendix D.

b. Other programs in the department, school, or college:

The feedback received from other programs in the department and college has been informal in nature and has contributed to discussions and program related policies that are oriented toward problem-solving (student advisement situations, dual-majors, etc.). For example, the department’s MPH program and its requirements and needs, helped in determining some of the changes instituted in the BCH program.

c. The dean of the school/college administering the health education program:

The Dean of the CHSS meets on a regular basis with the Department Head for updates and to reiterate continued support to the Department.

d. Employers of alumni and Field experience preceptors:

Formal evaluations (included in Appendix E) and informal meetings among departmental faculty, field experience preceptors and students play a key role in maintaining meaningful communications among all as well as an effective way of conducting process and outcomes assessments of students’ field experiences. Faculty maintains communications and connections with alumni and the various local employers to make sure that the program meets the needs of the employers and the alumni. A few of the employers and field experience preceptors serve on the departmental advisory committee and provide valuable advice and suggestions on maintaining the quality of the program.

e. Other health educators in the area:

The Department is supported by its Advisory Committee composed of 12 professionals in the fields of health education and public health. As indicated above they are also employers and field experience preceptors for the department’s majors. The names of the 12 members of the advisory committee, their educational qualifications, and job titles are included in Appendix F. Additionally, the department relies on all the health educators in the area to assist in maintaining the quality of the program, providing field experience opportunities to students, for consultation opportunities and guest lectures in courses, and for opportunities for students to conduct independent, special, or research projects.

 

D. EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM

1. Program Development

a. Document the consistency between stated program objectives and the current program. List any apparent inconsistencies.

There is consistency between the stated program objectives and the current program. This consistency is reflected in the goals and objectives of the program and the various program-related activities and changes. The following are the goals and objectives of the program:

All the courses and field experiences offered by the department are designed to provide the BCH majors with a high quality education and hands-on experience in community health and health education. These are aimed to prepare majors for careers in public/community health and health education, to get CHES certified, to be able to conduct research, plan, implement, and evaluate programs, to serve as educators and advocates on issues that affect the health of various communities, to develop collaborative relationships with other professions, uphold the ethics and standards of the profession, and prepare for leadership roles and/or for higher education. Hence there is consistency between the stated program objectives and the current program

i. What changes are anticipated in courses or activities during the next five years?

Expanded usage of student-centered, problem-based multi-disciplinary approach to education will be encouraged in the future. This technique has been the instructional format used in HLS 463: Inter-disciplinary seminar. Further community based service/experiential projects will be expanded to become a part of most courses, particularly in the core courses, as done currently in HLS 275, HLS 301, HLS 464, HLS 476, and HLS 499.

ii. Are the anticipated changes consistent with the statement of needs in Section 1 above? Give reasons and priorities.

Yes. These priorities are consistent with the stated objectives of the program and are based on input from current students and recent graduates, from alumni surveys and from the advisory council and faculty in the department. The focus on practical professional experience and increased frequency of courses are expected to meet the expressed needs of employees and students in the program. Finally, increased frequency of required course offerings and increased frequency of electives that are most popular, will be part of the other changes anticipated for the program.

b. What is the official procedure for initiating changes in the curriculum?

The official procedure for initiating change in the curriculum begins with a discussion of the proposed changes in educational needs and curriculum among the members of the curriculum committee. Following discussion, a recommendation for change may be made by a faculty member and voted in consensus or majority by the rest of the faculty. At the next regularly scheduled faculty meeting the recommendation is presented and a vote taken. If the recommendation is successful it is advanced to the College Curriculum Committee for consideration.

Curriculum changes/additions are discussed at the College Curriculum Committee and a vote is taken. Approved changes are then typed on Course Change Forms (flimsies), re-submitted to the College Committee for a final review to ensure accuracy and then forwarded to the University's Courses and Curricula Committee. All curricula changes are listed on flimsies from each college. They are then circulated to each academic department for review and comment. A department head may challenge any course changes and/or additions. When such a challenge occurs, the associate dean from the concerned college communicates the objections back to the department head from the originating department. If a satisfactory solution is not found, then the associate deans and department heads meet jointly in an effort to seek a resolution. Should the objections not be resolved at this point, the matter is referred to the Executive Vice President for a final decision.

i. What factors encourage change?

Factors that encourage change include the following:

ii. What factors serve as barriers to change? Explain.

Barriers to change include time and financial limitations:

c. What options do students have in planning their own program? Explain.

All students enrolled in the Bachelor of Community Health complete the same core curriculum. Students may select to concentrate their electives in a specific area of personal interest. Usually, students plan their 34 elective credits based on their interests and priorities and through consultations with their faculty advisors. Students may also enroll in independent study (3-6 credit hours) under the guidance of their faculty advisor to work on special projects in their area of interest

d. Are there opportunities for the student to explore special interest areas within the program e.g., consumer issues, nutrition, sex education, counseling, community organization, planning, administration, etc.)? If so, list.

Yes, a block of 34 elective hours that is a part of the degree program in community health provides students the opportunity to explore areas of special interest. Students may opt to use these hours to complete a minor within any department or complete courses in their areas of interest (e.g. alcohol use and prevention, from the School of Social Work). Students may also receive advice concerning minor options that the faculty believe may facilitate their learning and skills and in securing employment. Minors in business administration and/or health services administration are often recommended.

e. Is it possible for students to redirect their program once they have started? If so, are credits lost in doing so? Explain.

Yes, it is possible for students to redirect their focus. Usually, credits are not lost during this process. One mechanism that can be utilized to accomplish this is ‘substitution’. Following a discussion with the faculty advisor and the Department Head, specific courses may be substituted in place of others. However, the Department cannot guarantee that all courses completed prior to entering the community health degree program will be appropriate substitutes for courses offered by the department. Courses taken prior to entering the health science program may also be used to account for some of the 34 credits needed for a minor. Finally, the Department is flexible with transfer students who have taken their ‘General Educationcourses that are different from those recommended by the Department, if they are approved by the university for general education credit. Such substitutions have to be approved by the Associate Dean of the College of Health and Social Services.

f. Are curriculum adaptations made for students with special needs? If so, explain.

Yes, curriculum adaptations are made for students with special needs. Faculty allows the audio-taping of lectures for those students who are visually impaired. Faculty also attempts to provide instruction that use more than one sensory input mode. Accommodations are made for students with special needs based on the recommendations from the director of student services for taking exams and participating actively in the classroom and in their own learning. Additionally, faculty is also exploring self-instructional models for students who may require reinforcement at their own pace. Finally, the ‘Office of Students with Disabilities’ helps faculty develop ways to address the educational needs of students with disabilities.

g. Is there an independent study program? If so, how is it evaluated?

Yes, there is an independent study option within the Department. This option is typically utilized in situations where a student wishes to conduct a research study or an in-depth literature review of a specific topic that has not been covered in regular classes. It may also be used when a course is not being taught in a particular semester and the student needs the course to meet graduation requirements. In this situation, the identified faculty member and the student develop specific course requirements, assignments, and criteria for evaluation. An enrollment form is completed that documents the goals and objectives, readings, assignments, and other requirements to successful complete the independent study. The enrollment form is included in Appendix G. The necessary substitution and waiver form is included in Appendix H.

h. Are requests for program additions considered from all persons in the program, particularly students and faculty most intimately involved? If not, what are the limitations?

Yes, requests for program additions are encouraged and considered from both faculty and students. The Advisory Committee is another mechanism that provides input regarding programs additions and changes.

i. What is the minimum number of credit hours students must earn to complete the health education program?

The minimum number of credit hours necessary to complete the program is 128 hours.

  1. PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS

a. How is the total program evaluated by the faculty, by the students, and by outside groups?

The table on the next page is the program effectiveness and outcomes assessments plan used by the department to evaluate the effectiveness of its undergraduate program and student learning. These measures have been in place for the past 5 years and developed by the entire faculty.

Program Effectiveness and Outcomes Assessment Plan

UG-A. MEASURES OF UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS

GOAL

OBJECTIVE

EVIDENCE TO BE OBTAINED

I. Ability to recruit qualified majors.

The department will recruit at least 20 students with the potential for success in completing the BCH.

80% of those admitted will have overall GPA at or above 2.5 as verified by copies of latest transcripts attached to admissions application form. Also, 80% of those admitted to the department’s UG degree programs will be at or above the 50%ile on writing assessment.

II. Ability to retain majors.

The department will successfully retain through graduation at least 40% of those students who are officially admitted to the major(s).

Academic monitoring of annual student cohorts beginning with the 1996-1997 entering class (first anticipated graduation to be 1998-1999 for transfers).

III. Ability to obtain above average ratings on program quality among those graduating seniors completing exit interview.

The department will have its overall BCH degree program quality rated at or above 4.0 on the on the 5.0=excellent scale.

Exit interviews will continue to be conducted by the department head among graduating seniors taking HLS 478,496, or 499.

IV. Ability to place graduates.

At least 60% of BCH graduates who respond to an alumni survey will find (1) employment in health-related settings or (2) will begin graduate area within 12 months of graduation.

Alumni employment/ advance degree surveys will be mailed out at 12 to 18 months post graduation in January of each year.

 

At least 60% of employers of BCH students will respond positively on how the program has prepared its students for entry-level work in the field.

Results of employer (when known) surveys conducted via the mail and/ or phone conducted at least every two years.

V. Ability to obtain/ maintain program recognition.

To main full SABPAC approval of BCH.

Results from appropriate approval/ accrediting bodies.

VI. Ability to make contributions to the profession.

Department will co-sponsor or approve at least 4 continuing education events per year for CHES. At least 25% of its faculty will continue to serve on state or national professional organization committees.

Number of CHES continued education events approved and offered per year will be tracked by the bi-annual progress reports. Review of each faculty member’s most recent annual evaluation by department head to determine the percentage holding state/national office or serving professional organizations.

VII. Ability to work collaboratively to enhance health outcomes.

Department’s faculty (at least 50%) will serve on local or state-level committees.

Review of each faculty member’s most recent annual performance evaluation document by department head.

 

UG-B MEASURES OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT LEARNING

I. Ability of academic majors to obtain satisfactory ratings from public for their academic work.

75% of BCH majors will receive a satisfactory rating from external reviewers who evaluate their performance.

Evaluations from poster sessions in HLS 471 or similar required course that involves public presentations.

II. Ability of academic majors to obtain satisfactory ratings from health education supervisors at community agencies.

75% of BCH majors will receive a satisfactory rating from external reviewers who evaluate their overall performance in the entry-level health education competencies.

Preceptor evaluations completed as part if HLS 480 (renumbered HLS 496 in 1997-1998 catalog)—Field Experience requirements.

III. Ability of academic majors to pass the CHES (Certified Health Education Specialist) exam

75% of the BCH majors will successfully pass the CHES exam

The number of students who enroll in the one-credit CHES preparatory course offered by the Department and the results from the certification exam

IV. Ability of academic majors to obtain satisfactory ratings of their knowledge of community health education from representative group of external public health employees.

 

 

75% of BCH majors will receive a satisfactory rating from external examiners who evaluate their performance on a case study presented as part of an oral examination.

Examiner evaluations conducted as part of the course requirements in HLS 499 -Problems in Health Education (the department’s undergraduate capstone course).

Based on the measures listed in the above table, the table below lists how and who compiles the evidence/data for these measures.

Variables Measures
A. Recruitment success

Measured by the number of Pre-Community and Community Health majors. Obtained from the Dean’s office

B. Retaining success

Determined from the admissions and graduation data maintained by the college Dean’s office and the Departmental Undergraduate Program Coordinator

C. Ratings from graduating seniors Compiled from exit interviews conducted by the Departmental Head
D. Job placement for program graduates  Compiled by the Undergraduate Program Coordinator and Department Head from follow-up/Alumni surveys sent out yearly to program graduates
E. Ability to meet employers needs Compiled by the Undergraduate Program Coordinator and Department Head every 2 years through interviews/surveys with local employers
F .Ability to obtain/maintain program By making necessary changes in the program, for recognition example in terms of the courses offered and their sequence and changes in the requirements for admittance into the program. By seeking re-approval of the program
G. Ability to make contributions to the profession By reviewing and approving CHES credits for a number of continuing education event. This is done by the CHES committee that is composed of faculty members, certified health educators from the community, and graduate students
H. Ability to work collaboratively with the Community to enhance health Measured by the number of faculty who serve on various 

agency boards, serve as consultants and advisors to agencies, Organize campus-wide community health educational and awareness campaigns, and by involving students in such efforts

 

 

  

Students’ learning in the program is measured in a variety ways. In general, undergraduate courses in the department include writing assignments, hands-on community health related experience, and feedback mechanisms to students that promote and monitor their learning. However the following courses were specifically chosen to assess students’ learning as they progress in the program.

Course # Course Title Measure of student learning

HLS 100* Introduction to Health Science Writing assessments 
Abstract development Searches on the internet
*This is the first departmental course that is web-facilitated and being taught as a hybrid course using both traditional and new instructional techniques
HLS 275 Foundations in Health Education

Development of an understanding of the basic concepts of health education and public health through team and group projects such as writing a proposal. This assignment is designed to help students learn how to write goals and objectives based on needs assessments. Thus each project or aspect of it is designed to familiarize students with and offer them hands-on experience in community health education

HLS 395 Foundations of Public Health Understanding public health and epidemiological concepts through research paper(s) and exams
HLS 471 Resources and Computer 
Applications in Health Education
Through multiple projects  including developing Gantt charts, grant budgets, newsletters, and brochures. The course also uses completion of health risk assessments, development of a resume and sample cover letter, and familiarity with health data-bases as ways to measure student learning
HLS 475 Methods in Community Health Development of a grant proposal through work in small Planning groups and in a series of "step" assignments
HLS 478 Health Program Evaluation and Research Through an evaluation Design Project that focuses on development of goals, criteria and process of criteria, and measures to evaluate a specific process or issue
HLS 496 Community Health Field Experience

Through evaluations from  field supervisor and faculty of the hands-on projects completed by students in 320 hours at a health agency-local, national, or international

HLS 499 Problems in Health Education

This Capstone course includes three projects to integrate theoretical and practical learning among seniors

These courses have been designed to be taken in sequence and help to chart students’ progress in the program and as a tool for advising students on course selection and course load.

Continuous study and evaluation of the health science program is conducted using the previously described evaluation and assessment plan and both formative and summative evaluation strategies. Formative evaluation is conducted among others by encouraging students on an ongoing basis to direct immediate concerns related to classes to the specific faculty member. If this does not result in a satisfactory resolution to the problem, the student is directed to the Academic Department Head. Another mechanism which is formative in nature is the ongoing input received from the Department of Health Science Advisory Committee. The committee is composed of representatives from the community, professionals, program alumni, and current students. Input received from the committee membership is communicated to faculty directly in meetings or indirectly by the Department Head.

Summative evaluation is conducted on a regular basis via student course evaluations. At the end of each semester, each student is asked to complete a course evaluation (Appendix F). A neutral person (another faculty member) administers the evaluation. The faculty member is not present in the classroom while the evaluation is conducted. Students are asked to complete a structured component as well as to provide narrative comments specific to the course. Upon completion, the evaluation forms are returned to the Department Secretary who assumes the responsibility for their compilation. The structured items in the evaluation forms, are analyzed by the NMSU Computer Center. The narrative comments are typed as written by the department staff and provided to faculty. The results are made available to the individual faculty member at the conclusion of the semester.

b. How is feedback provided to the faculty, students, and outside groups?

Feedback is provided to the faculty via regular faculty meetings, through University, College and department memos, e-mail and list serve and in "working" group meetings and departmental committees. Each faculty discusses their teaching evaluations at least annually with the Department Head. These overall evaluation remarks are also shared with the College Dean and Graduate Dean for performance evaluation purposes. Feedback is provided to students through meetings with department faculty, scheduled appointments with Department head and/or faculty, in the Department Student Handbook, by e-mails and list serve, and during Field Experience Presentations and during other gatherings. Feedback is provided to and obtained from the Advisory Committee and other outside individuals/groups through scheduled meetings and through community interactions. Based on feedback received from many of the previously mentioned constituencies, the following changes were instituted to further improve the quality of the undergraduate program.

Changes instituted in 1999

Based on the departmental assessment activities, the undergraduate program (BCH) has undergone some changes as reflect better quality and education for students and to respond effectively to community health needs. Further, it has been valuable in maintaining a high level of program effectiveness. This information also served to help in both short-term and long-term planning. In the short-term it helped to maintain and improve faculty teaching and course content, in student learning and skill building, and in preparing students to meet the growing demands of the profession and communities. In the long-term the information will help to maintain SABPAC approval and for the accreditation of our graduate program. Some of these changes include the following:

I .Separation of the program planning and evaluation course (formerly HLS 478) into two courses (HLS 473 and HLS 478) to adequately cover all content areas and provide hands-on experience to students

2.Offering the Health Risk Reduction course (HLS 476) before the HLS 499, the capstone course, so that students are adequately prepared and able to actively participate in the HLS 499 seminar course and HLS 496.

3.Some of the core courses such as HLS 275, HLS 395, and HLS 471 are being offered more frequently to meet student needs.

4.The admission requirements have been streamlined and yet remain stringent to recruit good caliber students into the BCH major.

5.Course offerings and frequency of course offerings have been streamlined so that students can prepare and plan their study and anticipate the time of their graduation accurately

6.The field experience manual has been updated and reformatted and a new brochure developed to provide students with all the necessary (Appendix K). The forms required for enrolling in field experience are also available on the department’s web pages (www.nmsu.edu/~hlthdpt).

7. A number of new field experience sites have been added to existing ones and information about these sites is compiled in a binder that is maintained in the department office and available to students for consultations

8. Hiring of new and highly qualified faculty to fill in the gaps in curriculum coverage (Dr. Dow Velarde and Ms. Cardenas)

9.Improved and expanded web pages containing forms and other relevant and updated information for the undergraduate students including the field experience manual

10.Requirements for the undergraduate field experience have been clarified via a new departmental brochure and on the web pages

11. Students are regularly updated on program-related issues and availability of jobs through the departmental e-mail system and list serve

c. How is instruction evaluated by the faculty, by the students, and by outside groups? Include evaluation forms as appropriate.

Instruction is evaluated on a regular basis. Individual faculty members receive feedback from student evaluations at the end of each semester to help improve and modify their instructions and course content. Both quantitative scores and qualitative remarks are solicited in these evaluations. The faculty revamped this evaluation form this year (Appendix C). As stated previously the evaluation results are compiled and made available to the individual faculty and the Department Head. Faculty members are encouraged to use this information as needed for the future. The Department head, other Health Science faculty, and the staff from the Center for Education Development are available to provide feedback to each faculty in the areas of course development and teaching improvements. Campus-wide semester long workshops such as "Peer-coaching" and other seminars and workshops on campus are also available for teaching improvements.

To date, evaluation of instruction by outside groups has been done in one course – HLS 499 (Problems in Health Education, the department’s Capstone course). This is done by using health educators and public health personnel from the community who serve as external evaluators on various student projects and assignments. Additionally, Field Experience Preceptors provide valuable insights into the quality of instructions by observing and documenting student preparation and working in their Field Experience sites.

d. Who reviews the evaluation and how is it used?

Following the conclusion of each semester, individual faculty as well as the Department Head review individual course evaluations. The information contained in the course evaluations is utilized in course modifications or in the development of new courses. This information is also used to direct the professional development activities for each faculty. These evaluations are also compiled annually by the faculty member and included in his/her performance evaluation each December. Evaluations (formal and informal) from advisory committee members, adjunct faculty, and others familiar with the program are shared in faculty meetings and appropriate consideration is given to them.

e. Have any evaluation studies been done on how other factors such as class size or teaching load related to the effectiveness of instruction? If so, explain.

Evaluation studies of this nature are anticipated for the future. Overall, the departmental faculty considers this a priority because the above factors along with class schedules, frequency of course offerings, and the classrooms selected are all factors that can be related to the efficiency and students’ perception of the quality of instruction.

f. How are instructors helped to improve their instructional effectiveness?

Faculty instructors may take advantage of a variety of options to improve their teaching effectiveness. A primary source of faculty support is the Center for Educational Development (CED). The Center provides a series of ‘Teaching Improvement Seminars’ that are open to all faculty. The topics range from improving large group lectures to critical questioning techniques. Other programs such as ‘Peer Coaching’ brings experienced and new faculty together in groups of 3-4 to sit in each others classes, provide feedback and ideas for improving/modifying teaching methods are also popular on campus. Drs. Velarde and Krishnan, two departmental faculty are currently participating in the program with Dr. Krishnan serving as one of the head coaches. Discussions in faculty meeting and consultations with individual faculty also help in improving instructions. Asking students in the classrooms or asking for their anonymous input are other methods for improving instructions. The CED is also equipped to videotape an individual faculty member teaching in a classroom and provide the faculty member with feedback. The highly qualified CED staff is able to provide feedback in a supportive and positive manner. The college Associate Dean whose tenure lies in the Department of Health Science has twice offered (through the CED) and conducted seminars for faculty on student centered problem-based learning. The SoAHEC has also offered a 3-day long training workshop on this topic to universities in the southwest.

g. Describe any research projects or other activities completed, underway, or projected in our program to improve the quality of teaching.

Each January two days are identified for faculty improvement. These are opportunities for faculty to gain new expertise in teaching, interact with faculty from other departments and exchange ideas. The Department is also engaged in the development/refinement of student-centered and problem-based learning with students from multiple disciplines.

Faculty receives credit on the Department's performance form for attending teaching improvement seminars and conference sessions designed to improve instruction. Similarly faculty is encouraged and credited for incorporating new instructional techniques, community based projects, and collaborative projects into their course content.

h. Is there any planned way of exchanging or putting into practice new ideas? Describe.

New ideas are discussed among faculty at departmental meetings whether they be specific to courses, Departmental, College or University wide concerns, research efforts or grant writing issues, and suggestions and input presented by students in the program. Besides, Department head meets with individual faculty to review their performances and provide feedback.

i. What procedures are used for resolving conflict and for handling resistance to change?

The department head and the faculty are sensitive to situations that might result in conflict. Proactive methods are utilized whenever possible. Active listening, the use of reason, and an appeal to academic collegiality are also used in an effort to shape the potential conflict into a problem-solving situation. Conflict resolution techniques are encouraged and used whether conflict exits between the Department head and faculty, faculty and faculty, faculty and staff, faculty and students or staff and students. Open communication is supported and valued. If these techniques are unsuccessful, other options such as use of the Counseling Center or a conference with the dean are available.

When there is resistance to change, techniques such as those described above are used to overcome this resistance. Additionally, techniques such as open discussions, limited group interactions, and outside assistance are also employed. Further, the concerns of those opposed to change are taken seriously and addressed on an individual basis.

j. How is the success of students evaluated?

Student success is evaluated by their perceptions of their educational success as well as by the perceptions of the graduate's employers as indicated by the measures listed below:

  • Satisfactory ratings from external reviewers who evaluate their work and assignments in HLS 499
  • Satisfactory ratings from field experience preceptors at the end of 320 hours of field experience
  • Students’ personal perceptions and thoughts about the preparation they received in the department expressed in their exist interviews
  • Number of students who take the CHES certification examination and their scores
  • Students’ placement in jobs after graduation and admissions into graduate studies
  • Students’ grades in individual courses and GPA at graduation
  • Pass rates on the CHES exam

Students success is also evaluated using Alumni surveys (Appendix D), job placements of graduates, and enrolling in graduate schools.

Finally, student success is evaluated by the pass rate of our students on the Certified Health Education Specialist Examination as provided by NCHEC (Appendix AD).

k. What is the voluntary dropout rate at various levels and what are the reasons?

One of the program effectiveness measures (Refer to Page 19) relates to student retention and conversely to dropout rates. Since 1995 when specific measures for student learning and program effectiveness were developed and adopted for the BCH program, overall dropout rates have progressively fallen. This drop may be attributed to the various changes (described on pages 23-24 instituted by the department to improve and maintain the quality of the program and institute admissions requirements that help select students who are committed to and interested in community health education and those who have the greatest potential of completing the program. When students have voluntarily dropped out of the program, it is to change their major, move into allied health fields (Respiratory Therapy or Physical Therapy) or into nursing, leave the geographic area, be offered a job, or for a personal reason. When it is because of non-voluntary reasons, it is often because of poor performance in the program and consequently inability to maintain the GPA and academic performance at the required level. The data on the overall dropout rates (voluntary and non-voluntary) of students admitted into the program indicate remarkable decline from a 45% dropout rate during the 1996-1997 academic year to a low of 18% reported in the department’s 1999 Outcomes Assessment Plan and Annual Review of Results. There is no reason for this trend of low dropout rates to continue into the future. This rate has not been stratified into the various levels at which the dropouts have occurred.

l. Under what circumstances are students dropped from the program?

Currently students are not dropped from the program though they may be dropped from the University for having a cumulative GPA below 2.0 at the end of their second academic year as described in the NMSU Undergraduate Catalog. The department attempts to work with those students whose academic performance is below par during advising to help raise their GPA and to avoid being dropped. Based on the outcomes of these advising attempts, recommendations may be made to the students to support their educational goals and help them in achieving them (such as limiting courses, utilizing the services of the Learning Center, changing to a major of interest etc.)

m. Describe any studies completed, underway, or planned to evaluate success of graduates in employment.

Informal discussions and formal survey of employers is periodically conducted to evaluate the quality of preparation students receive in the program and how well they meet the needs of employers and the changing demands of the profession. The department plans to conduct employer surveys more often and on a regular basis. Currently we are limited by the lack of a dedicated staff who could collect, compile, and report the effectiveness and success of the undergraduate program on the basis of employment of program graduates and all of the other measures listed previously (Pages 19-20). However, informal discussions clearly suggest that program graduates are well prepared for employment and to meet the new challenges of the profession. The department’s outcomes assessment reports further highlight some of the results that support the success and effectiveness of the program are (Appendix I).

n. Matrices I - VII contain competency and sub-competency check lists for the major areas of responsibility for health educators. (See pages 35-47). Fill out each matrix according to the instructions found on each and include in an appendix.

Appendix J includes the matrices documenting the competencies and sub-competencies covered in the core courses that are required to be taken by all students in the program.

The undergraduate program coordinator, department head, and the advising coordinator in the college dean's office are all involved in the process of data compilation to determine the program effectiveness and the level of student learning. The department's advisory committee (composed of people who work in the areas of public health and health education) also provides their input and suggestions for modifications and improvements in the program based on the annual outcomes assessment reports. The committee is also consulted at other times as and when necessary. Students' comments in exit interviews and from alumni surveys, ratings and comments on faculty and course evaluations (completed by students at the end of each semester), and evaluations from field experience preceptors/ supervisors all help to determine the effectiveness of the program. For example, in 1999, this information was used to learn how and what to modify and improve as indicated below.

 

3. PRACTICE TEACHING OR FIELD EXPERIENCES

a. Is a block field placement or practice teaching a part of the program? If so, provide the following information:

All students are required to take 6 credit hours (320 hours in total or 20 hours per week for 16 weeks) during the spring or fall semester. No student is exempt from this experience, which the Department considers an essential aspect of the program and of students' learning and understanding of working with diverse communities and in designing public health education and prevention programs that meet the needs of the target audience.

A representative list of field experience sites is included in Appendix L. As is evident from this list, these sites are diverse and include local, state, and national agencies, These agencies work on community, work-site, and environmental health issues to mention a few.

i. Is it required of all students? If not, which ones are exempt and why?

Yes, the field experience is required of all students majoring in community health.

ii. Describe the range of experiences and opportunities for observations and practice.

Experiences for field placements include traditional hospital setting and other healthcare facilities, state public health agency, non-profit community agencies, worksite or corporate settings, schools, grant sites and wellness center. As indicated by the list of sites, students have a variety of sites available to them. The department has a list and descriptions of the sites that have been used in the past to help them choose one that meets their interest and goals. Students can also suggest new sites to conduct their field experience. These sites may be located in New Mexico, other states, and occasional in other countries.

iii. How long is the total experience? (hours, weeks, or months?)

The total experience is 320 hours for 6 credit hours to be typically completed in the semester prior to graduation. Students are encouraged to enroll in their field experience courses after they have completed their core (required) courses and a large proportion of their electives. This, the department believes helps students to effectively integrate into practice the ideas and concepts they have learned in the classroom and take full advantage of their hands on field experience.

iv. How many hours per week are required?

Students spend twenty (20) hours per week for 16 weeks at the field experience site during the academic semester. There is flexibility built into the schedule that allows students to benefit from other educational opportunities that arise during the semester and extend their field experience into two semesters working 10 hours/week over the semesters.

v. How much academic credit is received by the student? How does credit for field experience or practice teaching relate to other academic credit?

Students receive six (6) hours of credit for the field experience. Field experience is a required component of the student's academic course load and regarded as essential and useful in providing students an opportunity to practice and see in action the concepts and content learned in the classroom. Students input about their field experience indicate that they all appreciate this hands-on experience and its relevance to finding a job after graduation.

vi. How are the student, the faculty, the university, and the internship agency prepared for the practicum?

  • The agencies are prepared for the student field by the student’s faculty advisor who works with both the student and the agency. There is regular communication between the agencies and the faculty members. Field experience preceptors are encouraged to attend the ‘end-of -the semester’ student presentations.

vii. Describe the process of site selection and student placement for practice teaching or field experience.

Students and their faculty advisors, work closely in choosing their field experience site (based on the student's interest, agency needs, and the availability of opportunities) well in advance of the semester they intend to enroll in their field experience. The field experience manual/handbook is available to all enrolled students and also available on the departmental web-site describes the requirements and other details. The manual/handbook also contains all the required forms and time-lines (a copy included with this self-study). Usually, the students attend an orientation session at the start of the semester that explains the field experience requirements and answers any questions that the students may have. The factors considered in the selection of a site include the student’s area of interest, goals and other factors such as transportation, availability of opportunities, needs of the agencies, and the availability of a CHES certified preceptor for supervision. One factor considered in the site selection is the availability of a health educator who could serve as a preceptor.

viii. Describe the supervision provided the student by the school/agency and by the university.

The faculty advisors maintain regular contact with their students and with the field experience preceptors/ supervisors on site to develop the goals and objectives of the field experience and ensure that they are being met and fulfilled. The faculty supervisor is also encouraged to visit their students' field experience sites twice during the semester. Faculty members are also available (by phone or in person) to resolve any concerns or issues that may arise during the experience. On-site supervision is provided by the field experience preceptors. The faculty and the site preceptors work together to help students benefit the most from their field experience. All students present their field experiences orally at an end of the semester event attended by all students enrolled in this experience, by faculty, and by some of the site preceptors/ supervisors. Students receive a grade from their faculty advisors for their field experience based on their work, the comments and evaluation of their preceptors/ supervisors, and the binders they submit that documents all their work, their completed forms, and their time-sheets. The students get an opportunity to evaluate their preceptor and field experience sites so that future students benefit from their experiences and comments. Student field experience binders are stored in the departmental conference room/library for review by faculty and other students and are reviewed by the Department Head and Undergraduate program Coordinator for program evaluation and for outcomes assessment purposes.

ix. How does the practice teaching or field experience relate to other courses and activities before and following practice teaching/field experience?

The field experience is one of the culminating courses of the program. It encompasses and integrates the content taught in previous health science courses as well as other university courses. It is viewed as an opportunity for students to incorporate theory, concepts, and content learned in courses and to understand the application of this knowledge into practice. It is designed to provide students valuable ‘job related’ experience. Hence students are encouraged to enroll in field experience after they have taken the core courses and a variety of electives. Its prerequisite is HLS 475 in which enrollment is restricted to BCH majors only.

x. Is the student required to report on the practicum? Describe the requirements.

Yes, students are required to report on the field experience. Specific requirements for field experience are identified in the course syllabi for HLS 496: Health Science Field Experience and in the field experience manual (Appendix K). Students enrolled in HLS 496 are required to provide an oral report at an event attended by their classmates, field experience preceptors, and faculty. Students also document and compile their goals and objectives, their work, their schedule, and their evaluations and other forms in a folder submitted to the department after their presentation. The department keeps these folders in its library for reference. Students are required to concurrently enroll in HLS 497, a one credit hour senior seminar in Community Health Education. This course meets weekly in the fall and spring semesters and allows students an opportunity to raise professional issues and concerns.

xi. How is the practicum evaluated? By whom? What is included in the evaluation process?

The field experience is evaluated by the student, the agency preceptor, and by the faculty member. The preceptor and faculty evaluate the abilities of students in achieving their stated goals and articulating their experience in their presentations. The students evaluate and rate their experience and the site in providing them a valuable and useful experience. The various evaluation forms and grading criteria are included in Appendix M.

xii. Has a practice teaching and/or field experience manual been prepared? If so, attach a copy of each. How is each used? By whom?

Yes, we have a field experience manual and a new field experience brochure (Appendix K) that document all the requirements and other details of the experience was developed collectively by the departmental faculty, a copy of which is enclosed with the self-study report.

Experiences for field placements include traditional hospital setting and other healthcare facilities, state public health agency, non-profit community agencies, worksite or corporate settings, schools, grant sites and wellness center. As indicated by the list of sites, students have a variety of sites available to them. These sites may be located in New Mexico, other states, and occasional in other countries. A list of these sites is included in Appendix L.

4. CURRICULUM

The following section addresses the three items included in the self-study. Course syllabi for all core/required and some elective courses are included in the self-study (Appendix N). These syllabi provide the names of the responsible faculty, course number, title, description, course objectives, assignments and requirements, and classroom policies and procedures.

a. On Form A, page 42, record all course requirements for the baccalaureate degree in health education; include academic foundation, professional education and internship.

All course requirements, including pre-requisites, professional education, and internship requirements are included in Appendix O. Students matriculating under the 2000-2001 undergraduate catalog are required to complete 41 credits in general education, 29 credit hours in community health education, 21 credits in the public health core, and 54 credits of electives.

b. On Form B, page 43, list all courses offered to the undergraduate student by the Health Education Program.

All courses offered by the program are listed in Appendix P.

Provide a binder which contains the following material for each course listed on Form B, page 43:
Course number, title, description
Course objectives
Course outline – include names of responsible faculty

Binder # 2 submitted with the self-study report includes course syllabi which documents the course numbers, titles, course goals and objectives, description of content, assignments, and deadlines, and the faculty responsible for each course. Readings (required and recommended) and tentative class schedules are also included in the course syllabi.

5. ENROLLMENT

a. On Form D, page 51, record the number of health education majors enrolled by class standing (e.g., freshmen, sophomores, etc.) during each of the past five year.

Refer to Appendix Q for the number of health education majors and other demographic and other data including the variables that contribute most significantly to the success of the program. The distribution of majors based on their class standing is also included in this Appendix Q.

b. Describe the student recruitment program.

The goal of the department includes being successful in recruiting majors into its Bachelor of Community Health (BCH) degree program. Recruitment is done through the efforts of the college advising coordinator, department head, and other faculty at events organized around the state for recruitment efforts, and through the department's participation at conferences and meetings. Besides these recruitment efforts, the department follows all inquiries by potential students with a letter and informational brochures and details. The AHCOP and Southern AHEC programs assist in the recruitment efforts by visiting high schools, encouraging students to consider careers in community health, and conduct campus tours for student groups. The local community college has been extremely helpful in providing a pool of potential students. The departmental web site contains information about the program and faculty and also includes the application forms. The departmental mission and a list of the various courses required and offered are listed in the university undergraduate catalog (Appendix R). The departmental course offerings during each semester of 1999 are included in Appendix S.

Specifically, student recruitment takes place in a variety of ways. High school students are invited to attend university orientation days at which the department is represented by Health Science faculty. Junior college students from the branch campuses are also invited to attend specific orientation days. Both of these opportunities are utilized to answer student questions and provide relevant literature. Faculty also participates in community education programs to present information about the educational options available to them. Potential students receive an informational letter, college brochure, departmental brochure, and degree plans. In addition, each year hundreds of students seek additional information about the program through the NMSU Admissions Office. The Department is prompt in responding to such requests by mailing out the Department brochure and degree information.

c. Is the curriculum listed prominently in the university/college catalog? Is health education easily identifiable as a career opportunity? Comment.

Yes, an introduction that includes details of the Department as well as its degree plans are presented in the section about the CHCS. A description of all current health science (HLS) courses is contained in the course description section of the undergraduate catalog (Appendix R).

d. Describe and evaluate the policies for the administration of admission to the program (e.g., university/college quota policies).

The Department supports the admission policy of the College and the University. The admission policy states that students may be accepted either as a regular student or as a non-degree student. Students enrolled in the Department are considered as regular students. Requirements for admission as a regular student include: 1) graduation from any state high school or academy in the United states accredited by a regional accrediting association or approved by a state department of education or state universities; 2) high school grade average of at least 2.0 and Enhanced ACT standard composite score of at least 21. In 1991 the following became the minimum requirements with respect to high school preparation: 1) English 4 units (must include at least 2 units of composition, one of which must be a junior or senior level course); 2) science - 2 units beyond general science; 3) Mathematics - 3 units (from algebra 1, algebra II, geometry, trigonometry, or advanced math); and foreign languages or fine arts 1 unit.

i. Where is this policy stated?

This policy is clearly stated in the New Mexico State University Undergraduate Catalog, p. 1(Appendix R).

ii. How was this policy determined?

The policy was determined as an outcome of a university-wide ‘student retention’ study. The study demonstrated that students who could meet the required GPA and accepted scores on tests for admission, were more likely of being successful in the University.

iii. Is this policy adequate to fulfill enrollment needs? If not, explain.

Yes, this policy is adequate.

iv. What changes are needed in this policy?

At this time, no changes are identified in this policy.

v. How can these changes be achieved?

N/A.

vi. What is the policy for change of major?

Students may change their major within the CHCS by indicating their decision by the second Friday in each semester. If the student is changing from another College into the CHCS this must be done at the time of registration for the upcoming semester.

vii. How are credits earned in other schools and other countries evaluated for admission to the university; to the program?

Students transferring into NMSU have previously earned course work evaluated during the initial application process. Courses that are evaluated as accepted at the university, are honored as accepted in the Department. However, it is possible that not all transfer credits may be used in a specific degree plan.