Beginning
Music Study
by
William Leland
| The Questions: | Amateur
musicians are often quite content to make music without
the benefit of professional help. For many, though, there
comes a time when they feel the need for formal training,
for themselves or, perhaps, for their children. At that
point, many or all of the following questions will
present themselves:
Ideally, the last question should come first; its answer will influence all the others. Let us attempt to deal with these questions, then, beginning with the last: |
| How Serious Am I? | Very
few of us expect to become world-class performers, yet no
one is likely to embark on a course of formal study
without some expectation of noticeable and
sustained improvement; the question is, how
much? Am I inspired enough to muster the time and
patience it's likely to take, or am I just a dabbler who
will waste a teacher's time? Most answers will
fall somewhere between these two extremes, and each
person has to decide his or her own degree of
commitment, but in any case it is important that we
reconcile ourselves in advance to
facing a certain amount of tedium and frustration.
As with anything worthwhile--dieting,
aerobics, tennis, or whatever--a period of sustained
discipline is inescapable. At the same time, it must be said that often we simply don't know to what degree we can commit ourselves until the enterprise is given a good try. This is especially true of children, whose level of ability, interest and perseverance may be unknown quantities at the onset of study. So a good strategy for both children and adults would be to agree on a realistic time frame for giving formal lessons a chance, at the end of which the situation can be reevaluated. But the student must be willing to make an honest effort during the trial period. |
| What Instrument? | The
individual preparing to begin music lessons may
already have an instrument in mind, but sometimes this is
not the case; for example, parents may wish their
child to have some kind of artistic experience but
have not chosen a particular medium. What's a good
way to decide on one? Consider these questions:
What has been your prior experience with music? Do you or your child attend concerts? Listen to or watch musical events on radio or TV? Hear a church choir, school orchestra, or community band? Participate in some form of music making in the home? Do you have friends or relatives who are musical? Do you have a piano or other instrument in the house? Maybe a family member already "plays a little piano", sings in a church or school choir, or owns an electronic keyboard; or perhaps acquaintance with a trained musician, or simple exposure to music, has whetted the appetite for making the move from passive listener to active participant. All of these considerations can help determine an initial preference for a particular instrument, and point the way to the decisions necessary for beginning formal training. |
The
remaining questions posed at the beginning of this
article will be dealt with as we consider individual
cases. Only the standard acoustical instruments will be
considered here; those interested in electronic media
will find a wealth of information in the series Music and the Home Computer, by John Zeigler and Nancy L.
Ostromencki, which begins elsewhere in this issue. For
the present purpose, we will attempt to evaluate the
traditional musical instruments, in terms of the
following criteria:
.....and to shed some light on the practical aspects of studying them. It goes without saying that our evaluations and recommendations must necessarily be very generalized and perhaps quite subjective; comments and suggestions will be welcomed. |
| Acoustical Instruments: | Most
traditional musical instruments fall into one of the
following classifications:
First consideration will be given to our old friend, the most familiar and widely-used keyboard instrument ever--the piano. |
| The Piano and Its Ancestors: | Piano
is the Italian word for "soft"; given the
racket it can make, how did this thing ever get a name
like "the soft"? The answer is that the piano's
full name is not "soft" but
"soft-loud"--pianoforte; piano
is simply a modern--and not very logical--contraction.
But why call a musical instrument "the
soft-loud", either? Can't all instruments play soft
and loud? Well, they couldn't in the seventeenth century--not the keyboard instruments, anyway. The piano's immediate forerunners were the clavichord, harpsichord and organ. The clavichord was a small home instrument that produced a sweet but rather weak sound by striking thin strings with a tiny metal blade mounted on the back end of the key; and while the changing pressure of the player's fingers could vary the degree of loudness somewhat, the clavichord had a very limited range of volume and was not useful in even a moderate-size concert hall. Harpsichords, on the other hand, could be made far more powerful. They frequently were much bigger, often approaching the modern concert grand piano in size, with multiple sets of strings and even several keyboards. The harpsichord produced its sound by means of a keyed mechanism which plucked the strings with a decisive twang, and was capable of considerable agility and brilliance. But this very mechanism prohibited any control over volume by alteration of finger pressure; the sound could only be varied by adding or subtracting different sets of strings. The pipe organ suffered from the same limitation. While great variety and color could be obtained from different sets of pipes, the player's finger could do nothing to change the volume; striking a key merely opened a valve which admitted to the pipe a stream of air at a fixed pressure. It remained for an established Italian harpsichord maker named Bartolommeo Cristofori to apply to a keyboard the same degree of volume control that could be obtained from a string player's bow, a wind player's breath, or--more aptly--a percussion player's mallet. Sometime around the year 1700, Cristofori replaced the harpsichord's plucking device with an ingenious hammer mechanism that struck the string with an impact directly proportional to the force of the finger stroke, fitted it to one of his large harpsichords, and gave the resulting instrument the unwieldy name "Big Harpsichord with Soft and Loud" (gravicembalo col piano e forte), later shortened to pianoforte, or sometimes--just to be perverse--fortepiano. In either case, it was this all-important control over volume, long desired by harpsichord players, that engendered the piano's very name, and incarnated it as a totally new instrument. (For more on the fascinating story of how this invention came about, see the author's article The Why of the Piano on The Piano Education Page.) |
| The Piano's Development: | Over the course of the next century and a half, the piano underwent numerous improvements by German, French, English and American manufacturers, reaching essentially its present form by the 1850's. And the list of composers who wrote extensively for it reads like an index of the greatest names in music history: Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert, Schumann, Chopin, Mendelssohn, Liszt, Tchaikovsky, Brahms, Debussy, Ravel, Prokofieff, and many, many others. For at least a hundred years, up until the mid-twentieth century, the piano was far and away the most popular instrument in both home and concert hall. Its usefulness is still unrivalled, for unlike the wind and string instruments and the human voice, it can sound many tones at once and thus produce a complete harmony or texture instead of only a line of single notes. Add this capability to the touch control made possible by Cristofori's marvelous invention, and it is easy to understand why virtually all other instruments, as well as the human voice, depend on the piano for assistance when performing in a solo capacity. |
| The Modern Piano: | Piano
types range from spinets the size of a small desk to
concert grands ten feet long; new prices can be anywhere
from $2000 to more than $166,000. If you should be
considering the purchase of a new or used piano, please
give serious thought to the following suggestions:
|
| Piano Music: | As for available repertoire, probably more music has been composed or arranged for the piano than for all other instruments put together. The mountain of literature for players from tiny tots to skilled professionals, the vast choice of study materials and methods, the innumerable piano arrangements of every conceivable kind of music--orchestral, band, vocal, choral, songs, folk tunes, show tunes, or what have you--all constitute a staggering wealth of publications; it would take a lifetime to browse even a sizable fraction of it. But any good music store can provide a great variety of piano solos, duets and arrangements, and if they don't have something you want they can probably get it for you or tell you where to find it. Moreover, a few music publishers now have sites on the Internet: G. Schirmer, Theodore Presser, Boosey and Hawkes, and J. Stein Co. are presently online, as are a number of retail sources such as Sheet Music Online and Juilliard Book Store. |
| Piano Lessons: | Now,
what about actual study? How hard is it, and
how long will it take, to learn to play the piano? It's
surprising how often this question gets asked, as though
there were a single level of attainment applicable to
everybody. The simple answer, of course, which applies to
most other instruments and indeed to any worthwhile
skill, is: the piano is quite easy to play
badly and very difficult to play well. But
translated into practical advice, a good answer would
include the following suggestions:
|
| Onward and Upward! | Nothing is more rewarding than making music, so why not take the plunge? And above all, begin with patience and confidence, and the positive knowledge that music can add immeasurably to your joy in life! |
(This is the first in a series of articles on beginning music study.)
About the Author:
William Leland, Editor-in-Chief of Muzine, is Pianist in Residence and Professor of Music at New Mexico State University. He holds the Doctor of Musical Arts degree from the University of Cincinnati, where he studied under Mme. Olga Conus, and his other teachers have included Hans Barth, Vincent Persichetti, Karl Engel and Mieczyslaw Horszowski. Leland has performed to critical acclaim in some 26 states as well as in Germany, Italy and Mexico, is a principal conductor for The Dona Ana Lyric Opera Co., and has made numerous contributions toThe Piano Education Page.
Want to send comments or questions to Dr. Leland? CLICK HERE!